This is not about the Linux Foundations Overture Maps attempt to hoodwink the Open Geospatial Consortium into standardising Overtures GERS (Global Entity Reference System) 1. There is so little technical content available in that proposal that it is difficult to write even a short paragraph about it. But it is motivated by Overtures attempt to engage in the great American tradition of selling snake oil by suggesting that GERS solves real problems 2. None of the following is new, and all this has been discussed many times in the OSM community.
It isn’t as if having a persistent id for an entity isn’t useful, for example if you are running a restaurant review site3 you definitely want a way to reference and track the state of the object you have reviews for in your geodata source, be it be based on OSM or some other data. The issue is simply:
your persistent id is not my persistent id.
Or perhaps better, your persistence is not my persistence. Lets illustrate that with the restaurant review example again: assume you’ve generated an id in some fashion and map that to an OSM object (more on that below), when do you consider the current restaurant different from the original, and when do you consider it different enough that you will want a new id?
Is it
- when the name changes?
- when the location changes? What about if it has just moved to the next block?
- when the cuisine changes?
- when the chef changes?
- when the owner changes?
And so on.
The answers to these questions depend on your use case and your business logic and a global one size fits all is very unlikely to be of any help at all. Now you might say, but there are objects, places, buildings and geographical entities that have less tendency to change, at least on a typical humans time scale and yes ids could be useful for these, but they are by their very nature easily referenced by their location4.

Identificação em campo de Handroanthus impetiginosus (Ipê-roxo-de-bola)