The ‘public’ in public beach can be modeled with the proper access tag: access=*, then it also doesn’t need to be written in the name.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please try to confine your changes to a smaller geographic region.
Like so a multitude of people are notified of your changeset because it is spanning the region they might monitor, but there’s no change relevant to them.

The 'weird' tags led me to start a discussion on a changeset here: changeset/117134680

Ciao gg66
I'm here in the region fixing some `fixme=continue`s (see osm.wiki/EN:Project_of_the_month_Switzerland).
I've seen that in this changeset you changed several names of several boundary stones to include dots instead of spaces.
This trips up the JOSM validation checks, are the names really with a dot?
And what's the source of the changes, did you survey all those stones yourself or does the information come from a certain database?
Greetings from Bern,
habi

way/1023280272/ is definitively not a 'building', but a small metal box to feed cows, standing on the ground.
I would not map this.

MOPUBE can be added to JOSM with https://tile.osm.ch/bbe/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png as TMS imagery and attributed to 'Amtliche Vermessung vereinfacht © Amt für Geoinformation des Kantons Bern', see https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/blob/gh-pages/sources/europe/ch/Kanton_Bern_buildings.geojson

Hey!
In the canton of Bern, we have access to the 'Katasterplan' or the simplified version of it (MOPUBE).
This makes it *really* easy to update the building footprints, also we kinda agreed that the buildings should be mapped to their extent on ground and not to the roof extent.
Happy mapping,
habi

So-called data consumers (like Instagram) can take weeks or months to update their copies of OSM data.
If they do, the changes will eventually be incorporated, as they are there on OSM.

Und einen Ersatzneubau eingezeichet.

Und noch JOSM Validation fixes gemacht...

Weiter wurde in diesem/deinem Changeset die Adressdaten vom Eingang (node/544581438/) auf das Gebäude (way/43266082/) dupliziert, was aus meiner Sicht unnötig ist, aber aus meiner Sicht auch so belassen werden kann :)

In changeset/117156408 habe ich 'autismuslink' in eine Stiftung umgewandelt, das scheint mir euer `office` besser zu beschreiben.

Die Pagagno AG habe ich hier wiederhergestellt und gezügelt: changeset/117155413
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117114928

Mimacom habe ich mit changeset/117155192 wiederhergestellt und gezügelt
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117114928

Ciao autismuslink
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön machst du hier mit.
In diesem Changeset hast du zwei Betriebe einfach gelöscht.
Laut deren Webseite sind diese aber 'nur' umgezogen.
Schön wäre es gewesen, die Betriebe statt zu löschen, an den richtigen neuen Ort zu verschieben.
E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117114928

I have *no* idea how long it will take to make it 'appear' on Instagram/Facebook as I have no account on either of those.

I've added some relevant tags on the building, with the URL found from a quick search on DuckDuckGo in changeset/117136118
You *should* add more relevant information yourself.

Ist gelöscht, e schöne Abe no.

I added some buildings close to the crossing which you marked as a hotel, namely way/1027396651/
Is this building your hotel?
Then we could tag it correctly and it hopefully will eventually show up in the right places.

Hallo Patrick
Ich habe gesehen, dass du der Ersteller der Relation relation/13036227 bist.
Von mir aus gesehen ist die Bauphase fertig, fingsch OK wenn ich die Relation ersatzlos lösche?

Gruess user Liebefäud,
habi