Would you please stop glueing highways and landuse together. We don't do this in Sweden. Thank you.

För att precisera; det var det här jag menade: osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default

Hej Carl,
läs gärna hjälpsidorna först. T ex här ang default values för olika slags vägar (osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions). Då inser du att bicycle=no och motor_vehicle=no för highway=footway är ganska meningslöst, inte sant.

Är det här korrekt? way/839389320

Hej, du får inte ta uppgifter från upphovsrättsskyddade källor. I detta fall från eniro. Jag raderar detta changset.

Well change it to peak. No meters on Lantmäteriets map. So that's why.

Kann ich mir denken. Ich segle gelegentlich im Sund zwischen Råön und Hermanö. Das Sanddorngebuesch (Havtorn) beim Schild; mueste es dort nicht richtigerweise scrub an Stelle von wood sein?

Gute Arbeit! Toll, mach weiter so. Danke!

I agree that gps-tracks do not make this a path. As to plot 2:23 the residential homes on this plot are rather far from this path. You could hardly blame osm for the (ilegal) clearing of bushes.
Some times people mark paths on osm, where the ground is so rocky that you could hardly speak of a pathway at all. The "path" could be here or 5 meters away. I have myself deleted such "paths" on some rocky islands where I was aquainted with the surroundings. There were simply no real traces of a pathway due to the rocky ground. I know there is a lot of rocky ground out there in Nösund and surroundings and the satelite image do not show a path. When someone is making paint markings this could be an indication of there not really being a pathway. So I will not rule out at all that the path was being made on account of gps traces the first time. Then subsequent osm-users have merely fine-tuned the path. You yourself would have the best knowledge of this. As far as I know there has to be a physical object in the osm-world to be on the map. In my personal opinion - but it is really not for me to decide this - there can be no path without a pathway on the ground. GPS tracks alone without a physical pathway should not be on osm. If you as a osm-user with local knowledge do share this belief, then it is up to you to make your contribution to osm to make the map even better ... :-)

please take notice of comment to changeset (changeset/89423327)

1. The path was not through your plot (assuming it is Orust Lalleröd 2:63). The path went north of this plot. So there was no wrongdoing from osm-users.

2. The "Allemansrätten" is concerned with the physical usage of passage of way by walking, strolling etc. Allemansrätten has nothing to do with cartography. People use ways weather those are on the osm-map or not.

As the way (path) was not(!) going throug your plot (I have checked with plotmaps - tomtkartor) there was no violiation of osm-rules.

By the way, the eastern most part of the path is in the oficial maps. You deleted this part too.

Revert: this frequently used path (a lot of gps) passes north of, but (just) outside of plot (registerfastighet) Orust Lalleröd 2:63 (address: Lalleröd 694, S-474 96 Nösund). Part of the highway=path immediatly north of the plot is nearer than ca 70 meters and is hereby deleted on osm. Please do respect the swedish Allemansrätt (https://visitsweden.com/what-to-do/nature-outdoors/nature/sustainable-and-rural-tourism/about-the-right-of-public-access/)! You were wrong to delete the entire path.

Hi, what are your intentions with those edits?

you destroyed (partly) the multipoligon (relation/5616044). Why?

Ha, I wrote an answer to your question, which apparently got lost under some short timeout I noticed a short time ago.

Mind you tagging a street, which is non-oneway as oneway=no is no fault but unnecessary. I could think of a couple of tags, which could be applied as well: covered=no, area=no, location=outdoor etc. You see my point. Noticing that you are new here at osm - wellcome by the way - I was keen to point out this. Please take your time reading the osm-help (osm.wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide). You could read about implicit default values for highways as a starter (osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions). If you have questions don't hesitate to ask myself or som other osm-user with some experience.

You are not sure, but assume that this is a highway, which is not oneway?

oneway=no is default. So what's the point in this tagging?

Mach dich nicht lächerlich!

changeset/87128800

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69834

Förlåt om jag blandar mig i, men du har helt rätt joihoin, bicycle=yes är i detta fall en tautologi eller tårta på tårta. Bra att du tog bort det.

Med JOSM har du ju allt du behöver. Det här var inte så märkvärdigt. Du markerar hela skogspolygonen och då ser (eller såg) du att det fanns en snutt way för mycket.

Jag har nu fixat det.