You just broke mp (relation/10215199/history). What is the reason for this?

You changed the position of a rock (node/4350785418) and created a breakwater barrier (way/740016636). Where is your source for this? I do regularily follow the swedish notice for mariners (Ufs) and have no recollection of this. In counterchecking with swedish ortofoto from Lantmäteriet (the latest availible) I could not spot this breakwater-barrier. It is no trivial thing to move under water hinder or mapping breakwater-barrier. So where are your scource for those mappings?

This (way/738917716) correctly tagged as highway=path. Why do you change correct an valid tags?

You have now put the second layer of "lines" (natural=coastline) upon an existing one (which by the way is included in the relation of coastlines for Halland). So there are now three (3) layers of "lines" upon another. You commented this changeset - as all others - with "Changes to areas and lines not corresponding to underlying map." In which way does "underlying map" (is this possiblly satellite images?) show that there should be three layers of "lines". You would be well adviced to give an answer to this question. Keep in mind, that other active members - all over the world - can read this comment and your answer or absence of answer.

Yes, I just noticed the GraphHopper times. OSRM is good in this. OSRM foot 3:40. I know the localities in Frederikshavn and Göteborg; at a speedy walk you could make it in 3:40. Ah, I think I understand; OSRMs servers are "updated" at certain times? Still OSRM routing for vehicle still not working.

Yes, you are right! But duration 6:22 for foot? Where does this value came from? "OSM directions refresh"??

Det är helt ok.

No, sorry, this is not right. Foot is not allowed to disembark where vehicles drive ashore. That is why i put the amenity=ferry_terminal where passenger-gangway meets ferry. Foot rooting via GraphHopper was ok, all the way through terminal-building at Gothenburg and Frederikshavn. This changed when duration-time was put into way. I don't know if this is barely a coincidence in time or the result of the change.

Ha, OSRM foot routing through terminal building in Frederikshavn and Göteborg working!!

Things are developing: OSRM (bicycle & foot) now working; OSRM vehicle still not. GraphHopper foot not working. + + + So when OSRM vehicle and GraphHopper foot will work, I for my part would be happy.

You should have a look at osm-help (highway=path#Usage_as_a_universal_tag) first. The way you edit crossings will not allow routing to function at all. I noticed that you change valid and correkt tagging - without propper comment. Furthermore you have broken two multipolygons, which I subsequently mended. You have not shown any willingness to learn from your misstakes as a newbie. If this conntinues I will most certainly report this as an abuse.

Here; it's broken (osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=57.70149%2C11.94311%3B57.70136%2C11.94376). The joy lasted only for a week or so. No other change other than duration on way.

Nice! Still no routing with OSRM. But the routing (GraphHopper) for foot-passengers is now broken :-(. No tampering detected. Might that be the result of duration on way? GraphHopper routing for bicyles and motor vehicles still ok.

As you may have already guessed, the blue lines represent ferry-lines without route-relations and the lilac with.

Ferry-lines in which area? Here are the lines which are tagged "route=ferry" in kattegat and Skagerrak (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NqH) Press "Run".

Genom detta changeset har du förstört multipolygonen för riverbank.

access

Sedan kan det vara bra (som ett allmänt tips) att känna till detta (access=*#Transport_mode_restrictions). Det hela är mängdlära. Bicycle ingår i vehicle-gruppen. Du förstår säkert. Den dagen du taggar en access-inskränkning kan du göra detta intelligent med t ex motor_vehicle=no/destination istället för att skriva (som en del felaktigt gör) acess=no+foot=yes+bicycle=yes+horse=yes.

Ja, jag såg det; redan dagen därpå var det klart. Jag letade förgäves efter noder med surface=*. Snyggt!

I see; intressting. They apply Lua? I am doing some ConText, which also applies Lua. Well would it not be wise to test this first? Do append the way with duration, will you. Let us keep in touch, untill this works flawlessly. By the way I have not yet started my competing ferry-line (I illustrated this earlier). :-) So this should be the fastest route.