Super, dakujeme, hotovo.

A viete aj preco? Uz opravili most, kvoli ktoremu sa tadialto obchadzalo z jednej casti Serede do druhej?

The dust component is intentional and permanent part of the material, it does not go away with rain. It is actually there to allow rain to be absorbed into the surface and still be walkable (no puddles), similarly to clay on tennis pitches. Lookup that "crusher fines" material (it seems there are different sizes produced too).
So 0-5mm does not fit into 2-8mm range. Also, thanks to the dust, it is not loose surface and is not problematic for bicycles.
It is not as what si displayed nor described on wiki surface=fine_gravel.
It is more closer to surface=compacted (aside from a .
The image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Two_gravel_roads.jpg is weird, I wouldn't consider the right surface as fine_gravel, it does not look very loose. It is more crusher fines or dirt or compacted. I cannot see the individual stone gravel particles.

No neviem, bezne sa to tak robi.
Preco by to nebolo dobre? Musia to byt len stromy popri ceste?
Ale ak sa niekomu chce zakreslit jednotlive stromy, tak to tiez bude dobre.

Nerozumiem, myslim, ze highway=footway#Areas o plochach jasne pise.
Myslim, ze medzi pesou zonou a kusom vydlazdenej plochy je rozdiel. Problem je, ze tu nie je dopravna znacka pesej zony, takze kazdy asi len moze hadat k comu tato plocha sluzi.

It seems the material I mean is called "crusher fines". There is already some use of it in OSM, but very rare.

Hi,thanks for the updates. But it seems you have shifted all objects according to Ortofotomozaika, while they were all drawn according to the cadastre map (source=kapor2). You should have changed the source on the objects when you used a different source. Second, as all the objects are now shifted relatively to the cadastre map, let's hope the new positions are correct and you haven't introduced a systematic wrong shift. Note the area is raised by a few meter, so there may be a skew in the Ortofotomozaika because it is shot from the side, rarely from a point just above the objects. You can see it on buildings that the roof is at different position than their base. And in OSM we map the object where the base is.
You made this mistake with building way/739643650 which you have shifted to align with its roof, but that is incorrect.
So let's see what happens in a year when a newer Ortofotomozaika is published, whether you will not need to shift the objects back :)

What is worse, you seem to have duplicated the footway at way/1540314591 (there is already way/902159829 ). Also, as far as I know that area, there is n gravel surface on those roads, but a very fine dusty material. I called it surface=clay, but I am going to fix that. Some other ways are marked with surface=fine_gravel, but no gravel.

Zdravim, preco by to malo byt pedestrian namiesto footway?

Zdravim, to pridanie building=yes na relaciu Univerzity Komenskeho nebolo dobre. Vytvorili ste budovu v budove a robi to teraz problemy.
Netvrdim, ze ta relacia je nejako slavne urobena, ale nepomohli ste jej.

Vsetky Vase sady zmien maju popis "Add/update missing info." , co nie je vhodne, pozrite: osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .

Dufam, ze len "neopravujete" klamlive hlasenia editora iD.

I have fixed it for you so you can check: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=186612239

Hallo, bitte erfinden Sie keine Namen. Verwenden Sie ausschließlich den offiziellen Namen, wie er vor Ort im Geschäft/in der Klinik oder in anderen relevanten Quellen angegeben ist. Es ist sehr unwahrscheinlich, dass diese Klinik den von Ihnen genannten deutschen Namen trägt. Auch auf der Website https://excimer.sk/ findet sich kein entsprechender Hinweis. (Die Klinik ist inzwischen umgezogen.)

I mean that is for road surface. For paths with cycleway and footway parts using cycleway:surface and footway:surface is common, but I think it is only useful if the surfaces differ.

I see, thanks. 'surface' should refer to the whole road with. If individual lanes have different surface, 'surface:lanes' can be used too.

Hi, what is the point of adding cycleway:surface and footway:surface if they are the same value and there already is the same surface tag?

Vlastne tie chodniky v zahrade na hrade by sa mohli odstranit aj vsetky, lebo cele je to jedna pesia zona (relation/7836077 ), takze este v nej highway=footway je dost zbytocne. Len tu zonu treba rozsekat tam kde su schody a ine prekazky a to zatial nikto neurobil.

To oddelenie jazdnych pruhov sa robi takto: lanes=*#Examples (obrazok dolu).

Len mi povedzte, ci je tam v realite nieco inak ako na Ortofoto a ja to mozem cele vratit do povodneho stavu. Zbytocne do toho nezasahujte.

Zdravim, cesticka way/923551962 uz neexistuje? Na Ortotofoto (ale 3 roky starej) ju stale vidiet.
Myslim, ze chodnik way/136408029 zbytocne prekombinovany takto zakruteny.
Oprava zaoblenia way/23046536 dobra snaha, ale teraz sa Vam useky prekryvaju s chodnikom way/23046535, ten sa zase na kratkom useku prekryva s way/207806667 .
Posun fontany way/923214926 trochu odvazny. Objekty maju byt tam kde su na zemi, nie kde sa zobrazuju na Ortofotomozaike. Vidite to na budovach, ze su fotene zboku, je tam ista perspektiva a horna cast (strecha) je inde ako podorys. Ten isty posun moze byt ja pri tej fontane a Vy ste ju prave dali podla hornej strany ("strechy"), co nemusi byt spravne.
Aj na druhej zastavke zbytocny slimak s chodnikom way/167395091. A zase prekryv s dalsim chodnikom.
Bod node/12344771021 ma odkial nazov? A ma sa skejtovat priamo tam na chodniku?

Nazov Hirosima na way/60896935 je potrebny, ked uz je aj na celom areali way/25018494 ?
Aj celu budovu way/164368218 ste posunuli nespravne, na poziciu kde sa zobrazuje jej strecha, ale to je klamliva poloha sposobena len fotenim zboku.

way/220123523 odkial je nazov "papradovy lesik" ?

Preco musel byt usek cesty way/1537565189 odseknuty od povodnej way/220123517 ?

node/1707347178 udaje o kosi a lavicke uz su na objekte reprezentujucom zastavku: way/158551324 .

node/14005360341 naozaj ohnisko? Dokonca celorocne?

Ostatne zhruba dobre, dakujeme.

Zdravim, oblasti ako way/1537583888 nemusia byt nutne zahradou (a neuviedli ste ziadny typ, ci verejna ci sukromna). Ale ak su tam kvety na okrasu, moze to byt landuse=flowerbed, nie zahrada.
Adresy ako node/1787882472 ste sam odsunuli dalej od vchodu a potom ste ich duplicitne pridali v dalsej sade zmien.
Vymaz kontajnera node/9171833753 a nahradenie niecim way/1537583822 co pokryva cely pristresok pre kontajnerove stojisko. No nezda sa mi to.
Brana node/982272074 naozaj existuje? Ak ano, aka je tam dopravna znacka? Lebo ste tam popridavali dost znaciek obmedzujucich pristup (dokonca ze kone mozu), tak ako ste na ne prisli. A to ma vysku len 1 meter?
Tie plynojemy ako node/14005520098 sa tam kde zmestia do tych zahradiek? Plynojem je obrovska nadrz na plyn. Ak ste mysleli uzaver plynu v skrinke na ulici, tak to sa znaci man_made=street cabinet + utility=gas .
Priechod pre chodcov way/1001042540 naozaj zrusili? Na Ortotofomozaike je vidiet.
Na priechodoch ako way/1446784575 neviem preco pridavate neurcite crossing:markings=yes, ked je tam jasna zebra. A tiez to znacenie by bolo vhodne pridat na body priechodov ako way/1446784575 . Na footway=crossing je to nepovinne.

Na vchodoch ako node/14005519921 to level=-1/0_medziposchodie vyjadruje co? Su v suterene (-1) alebo kde? Ale urcite toto nie je dobry zapis.
Ostatne asi dobre, dakujeme.

No neviem, skuste nerobit tolko nesuvisiacich oblasti v jednej sade zmien, bude tu potom prilis vela komentarov k chybam.

Zahrada na hrade, niektore zmeny asi OK, ale napr. neviem preco ste vymazali chodnik way/513653078, teraz da bocna branka je tam zbytocna,neda sa z nej pokracovat do zahrady.
Divoke kriky (natural=scrub, napr. way/1539158942) tam asi nebudu, skor okrasne natural=shrubbery.
To iste s divokou travou (grassland), skor to bude landuse=grass (ak tam teda naozaj je len trava a ziadne kvety), napr. way/1539158945 . Tunel pod hradom urcite nie je spojeny s chodnikom na hrade. Vy ste pridali bod node/14015531088, takze chodci mozu ist do tunela (cez skalu...).

V areali Zbor väzenskej a justičnej stráže (way/856161144), naco je potrebne sukromne parkovisko rozdelit na jednotlive useky takto podrobne? Ale ak chcete znacit jednotlive parkovacie miesta, tak kludne, ale s amenity=parking_space. To povodne parkovisko tam malo zostat. Este ste aj stratili informaciu, ze ide o sukromne parkovisko (predpokladam, ze prave tam verejnost nema pristup). Taktiez zase zbytocne a nespravne rozdelenie prijazdovej cesty na 2 samostatne cesty (este aj bez uvedenia smeru). Takze tento areal uplne zle a zbytocne zmeny.

Strkovecke jazero asi OK, aj ked neviem podla coho ste zakreslili severny okraj jazera pod terasou.

Aky ma vyznam zaoblenie cesty way/158420691 ? Ked pojde niekto z domu 11 (way/158420707 ) na vychod, tak musi ist najprv doprava, potom dolava a doprava rovno? T tvar krizovatky bol predtym lepsi.

Zberne kontajnery ste mohli zakreslit jednotlivo ako body, nie ako plochy za vsetky kontajnery spolu, ale OK, je to asi jedno. Podla waste=* je waste=mixed nespravna hodnota. A co znamena 'household' tiez neviem, nie je to tam definovane. Takze co ste chceli vyjadrit?
Ostatne zmeny v tej oblasti asi OK.

3 schranky na baliky vedla seba (napr. node/14015530873 ) nikomu velmi nepomozu. Treba tam dat aspon znacku (brand), napr. AlzaBox, Z-Box, atd. Dalej uz to potom vieme vylepsit.
Podobne node/14015530874 .

way/158551314 footway=sidewalk OK, ale nie po celej dlzke. Usek kde prechadza cez cestu je zrejme footway=crossing. Pozor na to.

Preco pridavanie duplicitnych adries na vchody (napr. node/14005519919 ), ked uz tam su (napr. node/1787882472 ).
Ine zmeny okolo Papradovej asi OK, dakujeme.

Preco bolo potrebne muriky rozsekat na useky, aj ked maju rovnake vlastnosti?
Tie nazvy ako "murik s podsvietenim" alebo "sedaci mur" su z akeho zdroja? Alebo ste si ich vymysleli a ide o opisy objektov? V tom pripade do OSM nepatria. Naco bolo potrebne rozseknut cestu way/345979885 ?
Tie nazvy "male" a "velke javisko" su odkial? Nic take som tam nevidel. A ako viete, ze su to vobec javiska? Tu neuvadzate vobec ziadne zdroje. A urcite to nie su amfiteatre. Maximalne tak amenity=stage ak to je naozaj urcene na vystupovanie.