To su prosim co za nazvy tych zahrad? Z akeho su zdroja?

V OpenStreetMap sa do nazvu dava len vlastne meno objektu (ak ho ma), nie nejake vymyslene.

Toto asi OK.

Zdravim, ocenujem pokus o aktualizacie.
Avsak prakticky vsetko co ste tu urobili je nespravne.
Napr. cesta way/543392238 sa ma oddelovat od ulice Culenovej na poslednom moznom mieste (takze nad prechodom pre chodcov). A z Culenovej ste neodobrali ten pruh, ktory ste oddelili (lanes je stale 3). Tie iste predcasne odpojenie jazdnych pruhov ste urobili aj na inych miestach. Na bode node/14006095226 chyba specifikacia prechodu pre chodcov. Ale tento bod vlastne vobec nema existovat, kedze sa cesta odpoji az neskor.
Relacia relation/19067891 je uplne zbytocna, jej pouzitie na tejto ceste nic neznaci. Cesta vedie doprava, takze relacia nic nepridava. Zrejme tam nie je dopravna znacka prikazujuca z Culenovej ist len doprava (asi sa da ist aj rovno po Culenovej dalej).
Podobne ste znicili relaciu relation/15990321, odobrali ste z nej clena a teraz nema ziadnu funkciu. Pozrite si popis ako relacie zakazov odbocenia pouzivat:
osm.wiki/Relation:restriction .

Ak su jednotlive cesty do parkoviska Panorama City fyzicky oddelene (v minulosti neboli), tak ich zakreslenie ako 2 samostatne cesty je asi jedinym prinosom tejto zmeny.
Vsetko ostatne budem musiet vratit do povodneho stavu.

A ake "streetlevel imagery" ste tu pouzili ako zdroj?
Neviem ake lokalne znalosti ste pouzili, ked tvrdite, ze ide o nove veci, zrejme po dostavbe Ganz haus. Avsak stav, ktory ste zakreslili vyzera rovnako ako na 3 roky starej Ortofotomozaike. Co sa tu teda akoze zmenili? Su tam nove fyzicke bariery medzi odbocovacimi pruhmi? Ak nie, tak ako pisem, cele to nie je dobre.

Nitra, not Galanta :)

Hi, are there really 2 opticians called Zuna in neighbouring houses? No, there aren't, I have checked.
And there could not have been 3 years ago, when you tagged it, because the building 2522/19 does not have any entrance at the side to Dostojevskeho rad, where you confirmed the optician shop.
You haven't added the fake shop yourself, but you have claimed it is still there and you see there 2 in this same changeset. So I wonder how your "confirmations" and surveys actually work and why you confirm fake shops.

Ok, takze to asi mozme zatial nechat ako je s 'yes'.

Thanks.
I think the links to revert reasons should always be put into the changeset comment proactively.

Hi, shouldn't there be some description of the revert reason on the changeset?

Neviem, kde je to definovane?

Thank you. However, when a shop moves, we do not move the node to the new location, as the room/premises still stay (empty) at the old location. On the new location a new/existing node is rewritten to the new shop/business.
See shop=vacant#Relocation_of_a_business .

It seems 'name' has changed meaning and even what you put into it now is not recommended anymore.
But 'ref' does not require the number to be visible on the buses, is just 'a number by which the route is known' (route=bus ). As the number is printed on the paper timetables on the platforms, it is the best number we have.

Urcite, pokial sa tie informacie nedaju dat do prislusnych strukturovanych znaciek.

There should be some line number in the 'ref' tag. Only then you can put some internal operator number in ref:operator tag. Without the number the user will hardly distinguish the bus lines. Also these numbers like 405401 are visible on the timetables placed at the bus stops.

Dobre, tak potom ta verzia s disused=yes a nejaku informaciu do description.

Ja len, ze aby som vedel, ze fotky su zastarale a Vase upravy su presnejsie, kedze ste tam boli.
Ked budete mat moznost pozrite okolo tej chatky Cabin Devin a tie ohrady pre zvierata juzne od toho, ci tam nieco este nepridali.

Tiez neviem, ci ten Sportovy areal na zapad od farmy patri k farme. A tiez aka je vegetacia okolo neho, ci je to stale nejaka nevyuzivana burina.

Zdravim, preco mena doktorov do 'description'? Neda sa to spravit podla https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/gGGE2zUBKLI/m/icjcFb7jBQAJ ?

Uf, tak to je zvlastna vec.

Je toto teraz bludisko attraction=maze ? A je to zaroven aj labyrint maze=labyrinth ?

Zdravim, javi sa mi, ze v tejto oblasti devina sa to za posledne roky dost pomenilo. Na Ortofoto su uz stare objekty a novsie su na ESRI, su tam nove ohrady na zvierata.
Toto pred rokom ste robili podla Ortofoto (a tam su stare fotky). Avsak v dalsich sadach zmien pisete survey a tie ste robili len nedavno. Tak preto sa pytam nakolko to mate tam overene, lebo podla ESRI sa mi javi, ze mnohe tie vinice ci luky uz su niecim inym, ale to ste nezmenili, cize patram ako to je.

Ak momentalne trasa nie je pouzivana, mozeme ju oznacit ako disused=yes. Alebo ak ju chcete skryt z mapy, tak napr. type=disused:route . Zatial by sme ju inak mohli ponechat, lebo ak ju obnovia, je dost pracne ju zase pridat nanovo.

Ano webstranka v 'source' presmerovava na https://sut.stefaniktrail.sk/ a je tam ina trasa "Strefanik urban trail BA50". Mono by sa dala pridat ta.