The change on way/1160239565 seems OK, the angle could even be 90deg (perpendicular to the main road Kostiviarska.

But then change on way/33576380 does not make sense. Now when you go from this part of Jelsova to the northern part (across Kostiviarska), you want to get navigation guidance of turn left, then turn right? Even though you can just drive straight?
What routing could have been wrong here? Notice routing is different to turn-by-turn navigation guidance.
Or did you not get 'turn left' prompts when going from Kostiviarska to Jelsova? That would be a navigation bug, not to be solved by change in the map.

On the other hand, if you draw the centerline of the Jelsova street, then the geometry after your change is correct. I just dispute explaining the changes by navigation.

Thanks. But if you change a building like way/127495584 , then also update the source tag. It is no longer kapor2, if you changed it according to Ortofotomozaika SR.

Also please do not randomly move buildings like way/127495407 by a few centimeters. Buildings with source=kapor2 (or ZBGIS) are from Slovak cadastre map and are usually correct and more precise than aerial imagery. So only touch them if you clearly see in aerial, that the building is totally wrong. Or you can cross-check with the cadastre that the building has changed. You cannot see displacement by small distances on Ortofotomozaika that is lower resolution. In this case both Ortofotomozaika and cadastre shows that that small building should now be much longer to the west. So when you wanted to touch that building, you could at least improve it in this way.

This looks good, thanks.

Why are you applying tags suggested to you without understanding them?

This change does not seem correct in any way. changing turn lanes from 'left' to 'through' ? Again separating roads too early?
You do not need to draw every piece of road to a centimeter precision. Such a juntion can be mapped simpler as a single point where all the roads meet on the Innviertler Strasse and the segment way/102408507 doesn't even need to exist.

You must not optimize data for some particular router. You tag what is correct, not what a particular app likes. None of the routers on osm.org (like Valhalla) are particularly good so if they produce something wrong, it is not really relevant.
On this road, you made dubious changes: if there is only one lane, how can there be lane markings? And if there is only one lane, how can it be marked merge_to_right ? There is no other lane on the right to merge to.

Hi, what is the source of the maxspeed? You only claim to use basemap.at Orthofoto, where you of course canot see maxspeed signs. If you used it because there is maxspeed=60 on the B137 road, then that is dubious, as you are not on that road yet. Unless this road is again separated wrongly and is actually just a merge lane of B137.

If it connects 2 tertiary roads, then it indeed may be a link. Now you created a fictional tertiary road without official number. Anyway, the roads in the south are tertiary just because someone changed them like that, they also aren't official. In that case this can be tertiary too.

Hi, why is this road 'tertiary' ?

Zdravim, manipulujete udaje pre "spravny vypocet trasy" v nejakej konkretnej navigacii? To nie je spravny postup.

No, the previous location was correct.

Hi, I doubt twisting the road in weird ways affects navigation (which one) in any way.
Anyway, it is clearly seen on Ortofotomozaika imagery that on the road way/237508672 the left lane has s 'through' turn lane so I don't know why you changed it to 'none'. Just because some random navigation app gives improper commands does not mean you can damage data.

But all these roads and lanes in this area are ripe for a rework as they branch at wrong points.

Hi, why are you removing the name=HU,SK tags from the country border? Most of the segments along the Slovakia/Hungary border still have it, only the segments you damaged are now missing it.

Zdravim, aky je zdroj tychto zmien (ziadny neuvadzate)? Napr. way/59299154 je preco Tujová? Podla statnych zdrojov je to stale Rakytovska cesta.
Nazvy ulic, ktore ste pridali nepozna ani mesto:
https://www.banskabystrica.sk/zivot-v-meste/o-meste/mestske-casti/ . Odkial ich teda mate?

Zdravim, podla coho ste napr. na budove way/61741059 zmenili addr:place na Kremnicka? V registri adries je dodnes Radvan. A podla coho ste zmenili addr:source na "minvskaddress 2025-11" ? Ak pouzivate Dodkovu aplikaciu na register adries, tak tam novsie data ako 2025-01 nie su. A ak pouzivate oficialny register adries, tak tam zase nie je addr:place=Kremnicka (cize ani po manualnom kuknuti do registra v mesiaci 2025-11 tato zmena z neho nevyplynula). Taketo zmeny ste urobili aj na dalsich budovach (napr. way/66061015 ), preto ma zaujima podla akeho zdroja postupujete. Ponechavate znacky ako by to bol register adries, ale asi nie je.

Zdravim, dakujem za upratovanie adries podla registra adries. Ale naco je dobre "aktualizovat" source:addr na novy mesiac, ak sa v adrese nic nezmenilo? Ci ste hromadne zmenili na 2025-11 na vsetkych adresach v BB ?

A na leveli 10 su katastralne uzemia. Mesta su teraz na leveli 8 (predtym boli 9).

Nie, to prave chcete nahovorit Vy nam. Ze Vasa aplikacia ide presne podla katastra, ale Vy sa jej pytate otazky, ktore tymto sposobom nevie zodpovedat. Chyba je v aplikacii, alebo vo Vasich otazkach (a ocakavanych odpovediach). Nie v datach katastra ci OSM. Ked chcete ziskat aj objekty mimo katastralnych uzemi, preco na ne aplikacia prihliada? Nech to robi inak, nikto ju nenutil. Zamyslite sa Vy podla coho to ma hladat? Akoze ma ist do polovice okololitych obci, lebo Vam sa to tak paci? Zadefinujte algoritmus, podla ktoreho ma aj tu COOP Jednotu vratit, ked sa budete pytat na mesto Ruzomberok (nie katastralne uzemie Ruzomberka, ale podla Vas asi nejaka "zona vplyvu Ruzomberka"). Ked zadefinujete algoritmus, mozno su v OSM udaje, ktore na to moze pouzit. Ak nie su, budete si ich musiet pridat, ale najprv to popisat, aby to mohli aj ini okomentovat, ci to dava zmysel. Nie len nejaky subjektivny pocit, ze "ja si myslim, ze toto patri do Ruzomberka". V OSM sa znaci realita co je na mieste a ked to tam nie je, tak aspon objektivne podla katastra alebo niecoho ineho. Nie podla "sedliackeho rozumu" jedneho pouzivatela.

Dik

Zdravim, way/93946185 nezda sa mi, ze by taka velka budova mala byt kaplnkou.