Na stranke pre entrance je pre 'name' len "You can add name=* to identify a specific entrance when there are multiple choices for pick-up or delivery.".
Ktovie co sa tym mysli. Ako normalne by som chapal, ze aj vchod moze mat nazov, ak ma budova viac vchodov, ale potom maju skor nazvy ako 1,2,3 alebo A,B,C. Ale dat do nazvu destinaciu ku ktoremu obchodu vchod vedie, taky popis som teda zatial nevidel.

Zdravim, tiez poprosim zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako "GA", "SK" a pod. Pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .

Zdravim, toto neviem ci je spravny postup. Je k tomu nejaky dohodnuty popis?

Zdravim, aka je toto oprava? Preco odstranujete tie dvojjazycne nazvy?

Zdravim, aka je toto oprava? Preco odstranujete tie dvojjazycne nazvy?

Zdravim, ako vyzera ta sprcha? To je naozaj oficialne na sprchovanie ludi?

Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie novej cyklocesty.
Preco vsak bolo potrebne vymazat uz predtym postaveny usek way/1110476943 ?
A ta nova cesta by tiez mala mat pruh aj pre chodcov (podla Bratislavskych novin). Preco ste to nezaznacili?
A ako ide cyklocesta cez potok Cierna voda? Nie je tam most?

Zdravim, aka oprava? Vymazali ste usek cyklocesty, ktora tu uz existuje niekolko rokov. Uz tu ziadna nie je? Ale je, sam ste pridali jej pokracovanie v inej sade zmien.

I agree the elevation at the node is not 1458. But the node represents the volcano, not just that position.
I can rework it into a polygon, will that be better then? If ele on a polygon makes more sense to you.
You haven't responded why other volcanos in the world do this same.
See node/12995577013 and node/4693682411 . If you manage to get agreement for your suggestions of mapping across the whole world, then please come and we can align our poor Polana.

Well, just because you cannot see the crater on aerial imagery (because it is so big and is covered with forest, it does not mean it does not exist. You need to check height maps or hill shading layers to see the crater nicely, check e.g. your own link of node/26864346#map=12/48.6606/19.4709&layers=P.
The peak at node/26864346 is just the highest peak of the creater rim and it is called the same as the old volcano. IT is marked natural=peak so it can be clearly distingushed what is the volcano and what are some peaks on it. Notice there is also another one at node/5657428552 .

I agree with what you say, I just do not agree with the assumption that there is nothing of the volcano on the ground.
There are only a few old volcanos mapped in Slovakia, those that still look like craters or there are volcanic materials to be found on the slopes of it.
Like https://www.freemap.sk/#map=15/48.378331/18.639979&layers=X&osm-node=12404740519 .

We have not mapped https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0tiavnick%C3%BD_stratovulk%C3%A1n , which we could if we mapped geological history as you falsely accuse us. All your other examples are just extreme extrapolations that nobody mapped.

Hi, it does not matter that Bing or Mapbox are commonly available. But they may provide imagery from different dates and different level of quality so it is useful to know which one you used. Also many countries have their own local imagery, so it is useful to know that you did not use those.

Sorry, I do not know what AMDB is and I also don't understand what 'airport diagram' actually means. Also you have 3 changesets with same description on the same airport, so maybe some disambiguation would be useful about what was done on each one (like why there are 3). Also airport name would be useful for cases you want to return to the changeset and you only have a list of them. Or some other people that watch regions and see just the descriptions can ignore places they do not care about. If you do not write what airport you changed, they need to go a go and look closely.

Yes, some tools can highlight visually what was changed. If it is understandable why you changed it, a short description is OK. But there are cases where an explanation WHY you changed something is needed on the changeset.

Dakujem.

Thanks!
changeset/183733271

Yes, there is an extinct volcano in the middle of Slovakia (and not the only one). It's crater is at way/1379027424 . It is no mud geyser. Maybe the node is missing some website or wikipedia link to show the volcano is real, just extinct. But the remnants shape the whole region here.

The elevation was given precisely, it represents the whole volcano, not just the elevation at the position of the node. Check other major volcanos in the world (Vesuvius, Fuji, Mt. Rainier), how they are done.
It is also written on the node in the 'note' tag, thus for other mappers like you. If you do not understand (and don't bother to copy it into a translator), you are not allowed to touch objects/tags you do not understand.

If you just wanted to fix (wrongly) the suspected wrong elevation you could just delete the 'ele' tag. There was absolutely no reason to delete the whole volcano.

10 changesets with the same dubious description of "airport diagram" seem weird, please use proper changeset descriptions (see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments ).
Also quote the sources of your changes on the changeset (you provide none on changeset and none on the objects you add). See source=* .

What did you fix here? You just removed the correct node that represented the whole volcano, which you now have completely destroyed.
Of course, the 'ele' tag did not represent the elevation at the node location, but that seems to be correct method for volcanos. It was also written on the node, if you cared to read.

Hi, what does cuisine=community_centre mean on these cafes you add? That does not seem like a type of cusine (what food is served).

No dobre, ale ste ho zakreslili ako funkcny obchod. Opravim teda.

node/3688183599
The shop states it is closed since Jan 23 2026. So how could the opening hours be valid at 2026-04-06 when you surveyed it?

Zdravim, ten LIDL vo februari fungoval? Lebo dnes je cely v rekonstrukcii.