Ano, dakujem.
Len tie way/1502906902 a na druhje strane, ak ide o drzadlo na schodoch, tak to nie je zabradlie, ale handrail:center=yes ako vlastnost tych schodov.

Hi, I don't think all the huts need tourism=apartment tags as they belong to the main 5-star hotel already tagged on the whole area. The hotel is a higher standard accomodation than tourism=apartment. Or do you really want to say that these huts can be booked as apartments, without catering or any other hotel services?

Hi, what is the reason for changing the road classification?
It seems there is a schema for this road 11 in changeset changeset/113255131 where all these interconnecting roads are trunk_link and you randomly change one of them to primary? What is the reason and your concept for mapping this road 11 along its length?

Hi, these are fake paving stones on the footways. It is just painted concrete with some relief decoration.

Hi, It is not always visible from aerial imagery which building is built as a hotel, thus deserves the tag building=hotel.
Second, you write building=hotel (the form of the building), but actually added tourism=hotel (the current use/function of the object). That is strange. Also, most of the hotels were already mapped using a node. So you just added duplicates.

Zdravim, ta Vycvikova skola stale existuje a je funckna. Tak neviem preco ste to zrusili.

Myslim, ze pridavat local_ref na objektoch stop_position je dost zbytocne, ked uz to mame na objektoch public_transport=platform (dufam, ze kde to chybalo ste hodnotu pridali na oba). Ale hlavne to nepatri do nazvu, dakujem, ze ste to v dalsej sade zmien opravili:)

Elektricka aj autobus tu maju spolocnu zastavku, takze len jedno local_ref (pre kazdu stranu).

Please look carefully what you are changing. This stop already exists, and this way is just a duplicate.

Also, why did you remove tram stop node/8836057820 ?

Also the Asheri patisserie seems to already have existed as node/3579109037 so adding it again with no additional information isn't very helpful.

Hi, it is nice that you use MapComplete, but always write your source. Also please add a pub with all information at once, not in 10 separate changesets.

highway=traffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians

Zdravim, tato zmena nevyzera dobre. Preco vymazavate highway=traffic_signals? Bolo to spravne, auta tam maju semafor. Aj chodci (crossing=traffic_signals).
A zmena crossing_ref=zebra na crossing:markings=zebra to je kozmeticka uprava, ktora nic neriesi a nie je v zadani Maproulette.

Zdravim, 32metrov na strome node/5341623192 a jeho susedovi sa mi zda privela.

A preco napr. na Slalomke menite route=mtb na route=bicycle?
Bol som tam, a na strome od Cerveneho kriza je na strome zlte C, ale ziadne smerovniky o trase 8042 tam nie su. Ako som pisal, Slalomka nezacina na Cervenom krizi ale az dalej v lese. Mozno treba trasy mtb a bicycle rozlisit, ako ste to urobili inde (ale nezda sa mi, ze by sa mali prekryvat).

A to akoze po tych mtb trailoch akohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20398863 mozu jazdit aj normalne bicykle a ma to oficialne cislo? A naozaj ma 8027 2 alternativne trasy? No poslite mi zdroj k tomuto, dakujem.

Preco by na mtb traily mali mat pristup chodci? Podla znaciek na mieste su tam chodci zakazani.

Aj ked zprovozneny, ale nie pre vsetky formy dopravy. mtb=designated tam uz bolo, takze nebola potrebna ziadna zmena.

Zdravim, to ake podklady Vam dal SCK, ze ste mohli upravit napr. way/641368721 a jemne poposuvat body? Hlavne ked tuto mtb trasu nespravuje SCK. Skoda, ze Vam nedali aj informaciu o tom, kde v skutocnosti napr. trail Slalomka zacina, kedze v OSM to mame zle (aspon podla tabul na mieste).

Hi, why would you want routing over trails designated for mountain bikes only? What kind of vehicle do you want to route there? The trails are really signposted for mtb only, not accessible to e.g. pedestrians. This change seems wrong as a whole.