OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176903048

No ale zase osamoteny green bez ihriska tiez asi nema velky zmysel. Okrem toho tam povodne bolo uvedene, ze ihrisko ma 3 jamky. Tie su kde zakreslene po Vasej zmene? Alebo kde je tato informacia?

174876220

Zdravim, dakujem za opravy umiestnenia adries.
Skoda, ze ste adresy nepopresuvali, ale namiesto toho poprepisovali len housenumber a zabudli na ostatne ako streetnumber a ref:minvskadress.
Opravil som: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179595758 .

Urobili ste to dobre, adresy maju byt na vchodoch, ak sa vie kde vchody su.

Adresy ako boli umiestnene v OSM vyplyvali z registra adries, kde su umiestnene tak nespravne (ani na vchodoch, ani priblizne na spravnych polohach):
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa?pos=48.120413,17.118944,18 .

Dom by si to mal dat do poriadku (na mestskom urade), ak chce dodrzat zakon o registri adries a ak chce aby mu napr. sanitky chodili na spravne miesto.

46093994

Hi, where do you have the address Palackeho 35/1 from? On building way/56305186 .

119421415

Sorry, that is no explanation. There is no rule the tags need to be on a node, not an area.
See e.g. osm.wiki/Railway_stations#Overview .

168867389

Tak som to teda zaktualizoval podla tych stranok, aj so zeleznicou v budove.
Dakujem za informacie.

168867389

Veru, asi zatial nie je.
Zda sa, ze ludia nieco pouzivaju, zatial bez wiki stranky:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/attraction=model_railway#overview

168867389

Dakujem. Podla zaslanej fotky ide o modelovy vlacik, co ludi urcite nevozi.

"Miniature railways are distinct from model railways which have a track width less than 2.5" (64mm) and don't carry passengers. "

168867389

Zdravim, naozaj je to vlak, co vozi ludi? railway=miniature
Okrem toho sa zda, ze minimalne v severovychodnej casti ten tvar nezodpoveda Ortofoto.

102234879

Jasne, aj nazov kniznice vidite na Ortofoto...
https://halic.biblib.sk/

178159216

Ved to sa pytam, ktoru cast Horsky park nesplna. Nabuduce prosim presnejsi odkaz.
Tak to teda dajme prec.

178236641

Zial ESRI ma na roznych zoomoch rozne stare fotky. Moze to mylit.

178159216

No neviem, nie je je to les fungujuci ako park (lesopark)? Mame tam znacenie aj natural=wood, aj leisure park, park pokryty lesom. Ale ak sa odvolavate na to, ze v parku ma byt zelen upravovana ako spominaju na wiki (managed, controlled), tak o tom by sa dalo uvazovat.

178236641

Zdravim, co povazujete za novsie zabery? Praveze na novsich (ESRI) sa nachadza. Na Ortofotomozaike nie, ale ta je stara z 2023.

178555771

Hi, please write your sources next time, thanks.

174922589

Thanks for the additions. But when you separated turning lanes into separate roads on junction of R2 and 16 (correct, as there are islands), you have to update the 'lanes' and "turn:lanes" and also all the *:forward *:backward tags so that they match the new situation. After your change the tags are wrong and misleading causing wrong routing or navigation instructions.
You just split existing roads but did not update the tags so many now-invalid ones remained.

You also forgot to add turning restrictions as now from some of the branches it is not possible to turn into any direction (like left and right). Also you split the roads too soon, when there is still possible to change lanes (there is no physical barrier between the lanes), see the examples at lanes=* and osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement .

I have fixed it after you (see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178546094 ) and please do these junctions properly if you are doing this all over the world and in such quantities.

119314231

Zdravim, je zastavka node/9641488744 rovnaka ako node/3439000745 ? A to iste na druhej strane cesty.

152264384

it is now in bus relation...

152264384

Good catch. It is not in bus relation, it is used.

177739251

No veru, bol som to pozriet a je to dost inak ako v OSM, ulica je spojena a pomedzi stlpiky sa da prejst napr. bicyklom. Ani tam uz nie je zakaz vjazdu mot.vozidiel okrem zasobovanie. Opravil som.

171405489

Thanks, but you didn't need to remove the old names of the cafe.