Ja len, ze ked uz ste tie adresy vytahovali z registra adries, tak tam boli aj tie identifikatory a dali sa porovnat. Ale ano, asi by to bolo pracnejsie.
OK, prave ich doplnam.

Ano do fora som napisal niekolko otazok, zatial bez Vasej odpovede.

Ok, ak ste pouzili tu mapku mesta a vedeli ste tie hranice podla nej zakreslit tak mozno OK. Aj ked neviem aky je rozdiel v hraniciach, ktore som urobil ja na admin_level=11 a 12 a tymi Vasimi na level=10. A preco tie vase maju place=quarter a border_type=quarter to neviem, to urcite nesedi na to co sme diskutovali doteraz. Ako som pisal na fore, zaktualizujte cely Vas navrh preznacenia, aby sme videli, ci to do seba zapada.

Katastralne uzemia sa mi javia kompletne vsetky. Pri Martine je nieco navyse,alebo prekryv. Pozriem na to.

No Vasa lokalna znalost je teda obdivuhodna. Bolo by vhodne linkovat na konkretne VZN obci alebo zdroje, ak chcete pridavat taketo neoficialne nazvy ulic ci objektov. Nech aspon je jasne, ci to uz nie je zo storocnych map ako doteraz.

Zdravim, preco vymazavate na adresach znacku ref:minvskaddress? Zda sa, ze Vase zmeny adries su spravne (asi mesto precislovalo niektore adresy), ale identifikator adresy im zostal rovnaky.

Ano, este je to vacsinou zarastene. Neviem presne kde sa uz stavia, nie su fotky.

I have "fixed" the Flixbus routes in Bratislava, so that those that targeted the old central bus station now stop in the new one (AS Nivy). It was a mechanical fix as I do not have a source to check if the particular bus line still stops there or is in any way valid. Some are also tagged to stop at Most SNP in Bratislava, which is unclear if really both stops are served. Yes, the line connecting just Bratislava and Vienna may do so, but not the more long haul ones. If you can check it better please do so. Thanks.

Pretoze to tam tak bolo :)
Nie, lebo na wikidata zatial neexistuje Penta Bank, tak uvidim ci to niekto zmeni na existujucom wikidata id alebo bude nove.
Tak zatial som to nechal tak. Ak to navrhujete dat prec, tiez je to moznost, nie som proti.

Pardon, toto som zle pochopil. Zmena je spravna, na removed:building=yes. area=yes bolo zbytocne, ale to uz ste vyriesili. Dakujem.

Ona uz bola oznacena ako zburana pred Vasou zmenou, ale kedze moze byt viditelna na starsich fotkach este nejaky cas, robi sa to takto, ze sa objekt ponecha a zmeni na removed:building=* .

Takze tato Vasa zmena nie je prinosom.

Obcasnost sa vyjadruje znackou intermittent=yes, nie water_characteristic=intermittent.
Nevymyslajte si vlastne kombinacie, sledujte popisy znaciek na osm.wiki/ . Dakujem.

Podobne, toto nema ziadny historicky vyznam, takze znacka 'historic' tam nepatri. Poskodenie treba vyjadrit inak, ak nie je lepsia moznost, tak dat to do popisu (znacka 'description').

Zdravim, znacka "historic" v OSM znamena, ze objekt ma nejaku historicku hodnotu, alebo vyznam (napr. pamiatkovo chraneny). Rozpadnute cvicisko to nie je. Prosim nevymyslajte si znacky len preto, ze sa to slovensky slangovo da nazvat "historicky artefakt". Ak je cvicisko uplne nefunkcne, treba ho dat prec. Ak je len stare alebo nepouzivane, dajte tam disused=yes.

Dakujeme za informaciu, ale nevyuzivanost sa nepise do typu budovy (building), ale samostatnou znackou disused=yes.

Zdravim, aky je dovod zmeny cesty 120 naspat na cestu 2.triedy?
Neuvadzate ziadny zdroj.
Treba pozerat historiu objektov (changeset/158128318), kde by ste videli, ze uz je to znacene na mieste ako Cesta pre motorove vozidla, co davame ako highway=trunk.

Super, dakujem.

It is loose material, dust with small stone parts (0-5 mm in diameter). You can make holes in it with the foot. It is not compacted. But fine_gravel seems to have grains larger than this, and also the dust component is not so pronounced. The material is not osm.wiki/File:Fine_gravel_path_in_Voltino,_Zagreb.jpg , what I need is more like this but even finer grains: https://imgix.obi.de/api/disc/cms/public/dam/DE-AT-Assets/Gartengestaltung/gartenweg-anlegen-und-pflastern-in-7-schritten/Pflasterweg-randsteine-abstuetzen-13.jpg

Ok then, that clears things :) So can you help suggesting a proper material instead of 'clay' for the tennis court material I need?

The clay wiki says this:
"Note on terminology: On sports pitches, “clay” is a conventional name for a manufactured crushed-stone surface. On roads and paths it refers to natural clay-rich soil. Both are mapped as surface=clay; the feature type (leisure=pitch vs highway=*) provides the context.

A key characteristic distinguishing surface=clay from surface=dirt is wet-weather behaviour: clay becomes sticky and plastic when wet, making roads difficult or impassable for vehicles."

This seems to be a recent addition from you, which does not cover my usage, however I am open to change as there are very few uses of clay on highways.
I mean a material that resembles tennis court material, but is used on a road. Thus I used surface=clay as that is how the wiki described it (before your changes), although I understand 'clay' is something different as per the wikipedia 'clay' article. But I don't know what would be more correct. 'dirt' is not it, 'ground' is too general. 'laterite' is definitely not it. My case is described at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/improving-the-wiki-definition-of-surface-clay/141586/21 .

Hi, thanks for the hint. However I do not agree with the retagging.
1. surface=laterite is a non-tag. At 57 uses worldwide, I do not understand how any such tag could be approved. The proposal page is nicely done, but there is no real-world usage to show where it would be used or how people want to use it. Nobody uses it.
2. surface=clay is the material used on tennis courts, meaning crushed stones or bricks (contains dust but also small parts smaller than fine_gravel). It may be red. However, on the footways in our city, the material looks the same, but is not red, usually pale white. See e.g. https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/48.156809/17.120886&layers=X~I&image=595574 for an example.
3. It does not get slippery or muddy in rain.
4. Our country is not in tropics.
5. The surface does not crack in dry season (there are even no such wet/dry seasons).

Thus I don't see how laterite applies to the special park footways in this city, when most of the characteristic properties of the material do not apply here. I understand the material may look very similar on first sight.

I don't see why you need to care for the clay footways in Slovakia, when the tag is only used 57 times world-wide. When there are 100 000 uses in proper parts of the world (like half of Africa), then please come back and you can have a case. Thanks.

Zdravim, tak tazko ste nazov mohli najst na Aerial imagery, ci survey, kedze sa tak oficialne nenazyva:
note/3296932 . "Local knowledge" mozno, kedze ludovo sa tak nazyva. Uvadzajte spravne zdroje.