aceman444's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181277212 | Zdravim, ako mozu byt 4 piknikove miesta vedla seba (napr. node/13727532545) ? A jedno je pre zakaznikov?
|
|
| 181262880 | Ok, ak su na streche, tak treba dat location=roof, nech je to jasne.
Tak mozno nerobte takou rychlostou, nech to ma aj nejaku kvalitu. Slovenske popisy sad zmien im v Amerike velmi nepomozu. |
|
| 181271511 | Podkladove snimky myslim. Vas editor uviedol, ze ste pouzili basemap.at (rakuske snimky), ktore su ale rozmazanejsie ako slovenske od Ortofotomozaika SR. Tak sa pytam, ci je na to dovod. |
|
| 181099819 | Nobody knows if it is appropriate as nobody knows what you mean by it, if it is not documented. You can invent your own tags or roles if none exist for the purpose you want. But you need to document it on the wiki so that people and software understand what you mean. Especially for established objects like boundaries, adding a new role may trip applications. E.g. JOSM is complaining as it does not undertand what the new member is.
|
|
| 181724919 | Zdravim, ale to treba aj nejako oznacit, ze tie vchody nie su pre verejnost. "note" navigacii nepomoze. Pridat to takto je horsie ako nic, lebo to vyzera, ze sa tadial da ist. Opravim to, ale nemusel som si vsimnut. |
|
| 102997914 | A hlavne cele to Inspire je tak nepresne, ze bude treba skontrolovat a opravit kazdu budovu. Takze ak sa to neurobilo pri importe, nema takato sada zmien velky prinos. |
|
| 165652477 | Adresa 822/3A uz je zadana na dome juznejsie, takze nebolo potrebne ju pridavat duplicitne na garaz. |
|
| 181099819 | Hi, what is the source of this data? Surely not the claimed Ortofotomozaika SR. Also, the role "highest_point" does not seem to be documented on the wiki. You should do that before you mass add data like this. |
|
| 181262880 | Tiez poprosim trochu hodnotnejsie popisy sad zmien ako "pridanie objektov", pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . |
|
| 181262880 | Zdravim, nemozete len tak do stredu budovy vlozit inu budovu (building): way/1498967942 . Je to zrejme cast budovy (building:part). A tiez podorys tej veze vyzera byt vacsi ako ste to nakreslili (na fotkach zabera celu tu prednu cast kostola). Tiez tych 5 soch (ktore nie su v stene), je vovnutri kostola? |
|
| 181271511 | Zdravim, poprosim tie parkoviska trochu presnejsie a nie nejaky halabala utvar popri ceste. A tiez napr tie pri ceste Muranskej nie su parking=surface, ale parking=street_side. A preco na uzemi Slovenska pouzivate snimky basemap.at a nie Ortofotomozaiku SR? Zdaju sa Vam novsie? |
|
| 146448456 | Hi, why are you adding duplicate wikidata tags to parts of Devin castle? |
|
| 175279538 | Dobrý deň.
Dakujem za nasledne odstranenie "j." z nazvov. |
|
| 123441664 | Prosim pozor, cyklisti asi nemusia prejst cez sukromnu branu: node/9879348048 . Dam ju vedla cyklocesty, nema byt jej sucastou. |
|
| 180314077 | Dakujem, podla toho nazvu sa dali fotky vyhladat. Nedozvedel som sa, ako sa da platit v hotovosti (jedine mozno v obchodoch, kde sa PAAS da zaplatit). V automatoch je len kartou a na parkoviskach cez sms ci apku.
|
|
| 174521545 | Hi, the wikidata item is not linked to the wikipedia page in German. Also, there exists a properly linked page in Slovak, and as that is the local language, that one should have been added into wikipedia tag with priority. |
|
| 168392215 | Dobry den, su tieto historicke nazvy este dnes relevantne? Existuju aj v nejakom sucasnom zdroji? |
|
| 180314077 | Na mapy.com som fotky tabuliek PAAS nenasiel. Viete dal linku s nejakym prikladom? |
|
| 180314077 | No neviem, napr. niekde sa cislo useku 4201 lisi od toho ako to ma na mape paas.sk. Pozriem si teda fotky.
Inak prave o PAAS diskutujeme na fore ako tie parkoviska znacit, ak sa chcete pridat je to na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/CzurYS4k4Jw . |
|
| 173631568 | Hi, which example in the page are you refering to specifically? The page mostly talks about connecting ways leading to a pedestrian area. It is less clear if they want OSM ways inside pedestrian areas too. Some images show such ways (the green lines), some do specifically do not (the blue lines do not exist, they are routing possibitilies in apps). Anyway, when you do draw ways inside areas, it is always important to have them the same tags as the area. And that is not what was done here, the author put random ways like highway=footway and highway=cycleway on the edge of highway=pedestrian(+area=yes), thus creating a road with different properties that does not exist in reality. It would be better to actually fix tags on the areas to allow proper routing. And you can see the original author's idea that areas cannot be routed was false. See e.g.
OSRM builds a bike route not using the ways the author added. So they were needless and I have removed them since. |