Teda existuje aj firma PAAS, s.r.o. (https://paas.sk/spolocnost/o-nas/ ), ale neviem ci ta pokryva vsetky parkoviska PAAS a ktore presne.

Oznacil som parkoviska prislusnymi znackami, lebo v 'description' tomu ziadna aplikacia nebude rozumiet.
Tie tabulky inde v meste neznacime, ale ak ich chcete tak kludne. Len 'operator' nema byt PAAS (to nie je firma). PAAS davam do brand, a v operatorovi je Hlavne mesto SR ... Pozrite tie parkoviska.
Neurobil som zatial vsetky ale na zaciatok zapadnu cast.

A ako sa da na tych parkoviskach platit v hotovosti, ked ste to tak oznacili?

Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie parkovisk a oznacenie, ktore su v PAAS. Naozaj su ale na ulici Havelkova take jednotlive osamotene parkovacie miesta?

Veru, ten pri elektricke tam na 100% nie je podla Vasich fotiek.

Thanks for the explanations. Sadly, they confirm many of the changes are wrong and I need to fix them.

There was information on the fast food (cafe) that it has outdoor seating, so that indicated there are benches or chairs around it. You wanted to map them separately, so it could have been done properly.
Also it does not mean it is a picknick place just because there are some benches, but in this case I think you may be right, it is a popular place.

way/239014891 , in Slovakia you need to see permission for bikes on footways (not just not seeing no restriction), before you add bicycle=yes. Otherwise bikes can go there, just with walking speed and pedestrians have priority.
Yes in this old town pedestrian zone bikes are allowed on signs at entry to the zone, sometimes it is just a question where the zone ends. There is signage that from Kapucinska bikes can continue along the tram tracks over the bridge. It is unclear if they can go down the footway you tagged. But as it is withing the pedestrian zones, they may be allowed. I'll check it on the ground.

Routing through an area is possible and just because some navigation is not able to do it, it is not allowed to twist data in OSM for that application.
The area at Hurbanovo nameste was missing bicycle=yes as a whole, that may be why navigation was avoiding it. There was no need for a parallel footway on its border having different conflicting tags.
And It also does not explain why you had to connect the footway at Kapucinska onto the pedestrian area when they are separated in reality.

The layer tags in the hotel does not even need to exist, the tunnel goes through the building so they are at the same level. And just because something is "up" (or higher than something else). You may mean 'level' tag in relation to where the objects exist relative to the levels of the building.

And if you do not understand if tag changes proposed by iD are correct, then never blindly click its suggestions. They are known to be often wrong.

I have fixed the problems, but pay more attention next time, thanks.

O, dakujem za starost o moje blaho :)
Ale ked teda toto je Vasa odpoved, tak zjavne uz nemate co povedat. Neviete relevantne obhajit sporne zmeny, vsetky Vase zdovodnenia su nepochopenim OSM, manipulaciou dat pre router a pod.
Opravim to, ale nabuduce uz take nerobte.

Vidim, ze ani Vam tento chlapik neodpoveda. Ani na anglictinu, ked uz ma v takom jazyku iD.

Pravda, kociky pridal predosly maper. Tak potom mu to nechajte, ked ste to nepridali. Ak to ale viete posudit, ci tam kociky maju pristup (podla mna k vacsine boxov maju, tak ako chodci, tak to netreba zvyraznovat), tak to samozrejme opravte. Dakujem.
Aj ked zrovna mapperue nie je vzorom spravnosti.

Ano tie ruiny musim pozriet.

Ktory chodnik myslite? Je tu nieco nespravne?

Sam to nazyvate pesou zonou, ale taka znacka tam nie je. Mozme sa bavit preco to je pedestrian v zmysle OSM, ked uvediete jasny dovod.

Ale to je ten najmensi problem tychto zmien.

Cize vlastne podla popisu medzi footway a pedestrian nie je ziadny rozdiel. Z tejto citacie nemozete tvrdit, ze toto je jasne pedestrian.

Podla mna na pesiu zonu niekedy mozu aj vozidla, ktore su tam povolene (co je aj na wiki). Na chodnik vacsinou nie. Toto uzemie by to mohlo splnat, ale Vy ziadny taky dovod neuvadzate.

Akoby sa pocet schodov nedal definovat? Pretoze sa plynule stracaju a pocet schodov sa zmensuje? Ale na konkretnom mieste kde boli schody zakreslene, urcite je aj konkretny pocet schodov.

Ano pozrel som sa a cakam kedy to poopravujete. Lebo sucasny stav je uplny blud.

Rozumiem, v principe mate pravdu.
Tu vsak o zaciatocnika nejde, vzdy ked narazim na jeho zmenu, tak je to tragedia, na nic nereaguje a na fore klame. Takze tiez nemam dovod byt velmi diplomaticky.

Aj ini to uz po Vas museli opravovat: changeset/173274760 .

Ako obycajne ziadny zdroj.
Podla novin je to naopak, zo Zabotovej sa moze zabocit len dolava, uz nie doprava.
https://www.bratislavskenoviny.sk/aktuality/stare-mesto/87870-pripominame-hlavne-mesto-meni-organizaciu-dopravy-na-zabotovej-a-karpatskej
Ak teda na mieste nedali znacky opacne, spravim to v OSM podla clanku.

A na tej Karpatskej ste tiez nic nedosiahli, relacia obmedzenia zabocenia s jednym clenom (dokonca bez roli) je neplatna.

To iste zo Zabotovej, relacia nefunkcna. Tam ani ziadna nemusela byt, ked ste chceli len doprava.

Ak neviete robit tieto relacie tak sa to naucte, alebo ich nerobte, lebo nahodou vyrobite nezmyselny zakaz, ktory bude vodicom skodit.

I don't know. If you quoted a source we could have checked.

Changing buildings into underground parkings? There clearly is a building part between the 4 apartment houses of Bory na Hradzi A*, so why removing it. If there is a parking that can be modelled too. But do not remove valid buildings. You can check even the cadarste considers all that as one building.

I really doubt the new footways are only 1 meter wide.

Thanks for adding new parkings here. But you did not need to damage parkings already drawn precisely from cadastre map (marked with source=ZBGIS) and move them to wrong imprecise locations based on ESRI.

Hi, what do you try to express with the tag access=permit? Are you sure anyone can get the permit to park here?

Also please do not make changes in such a large area across multiple countries.