Ak planujete mapovat viac a nieco by ste nevedeli, tak pozrite tu wiki (editor iD casto zavadza s navrhmi znaciek), alebo mi napiste, pripadne slovenske OSM forum je na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk . Napriklad to miesto s ulmi v lese som Vam opravil.

Veru, Google sa nesmie. Moze sa fotky Mapillary.com a samozrejme vlastne, ale to spada pod source=survey.
Ak mate moznost byt pri zavorach a vidite aka je tam presne dopravna znacka zakazujuca vjazd vozidiel tak to je dobre pridat do OSM. Ak tam znacka nie je ziadna, tak asi len pre vozidla vlastnika ci s povolenim (vehicle=private). Chodci casto prejst mozu, ak tam nie je vyslovne zakaz vstupu aj pre chodcov, ci tabula "sukromny pozemok".

Zda sa mi, ze 1 a 2 su rovnake linky. Ale chapem, co myslite. Len ma to strasne nebavi sekat priechody este na take male kusky :)

Aha, dakujem.

Ano, to verim, zial konkretne iD editor, ktory pouzivate, casto zavadza a jeho nahrady nie su vhodne. Treba ich pouzit len ak naozaj rozumiete co znamenaju.

Dakujem za upozornenie. V dnesnej dobe to tak aj robim, ale samozrejme mi moze nejaka cesta ujst.

Super, dakujem.

Zdravim, co prosim vyjadruje znacka narrow=2 ?

Zdravim, ake "streetlevel imagery" ste tu pouzili?

Hi. Thanks for the additions.
But please try to use established tags as described on osm.wiki .
E.g. the object at node/12826418893 is no park, nor a meadow, nor is it called "Beehive meadow" (especially in Slovakia, where local language is not English). So do not put random descriptions into the 'name' tag. Only use proper object names there. The contents of 'description' is fine.
What you wanted is landuse=apiary and man_made=beehive . Thanks.

Tiez ak to nie je prevadzka, kam ma chodit verejnost (ako na beznu policajnu stanicu (napr. obvodne oddelenie)), tak tam nepatri ani amenity=police.

Zdraivm, dakujem za doplnenie. Ale davajte pozor, divadlo nezabera celu budovu. A ked ste ho zaznacili ako bod node/11432439988 tak netreba divadlo duplikovat aj na budovu.

Ale kedze si tam znacenie potencialne odporuje, kludne to prerobte na opacnu stranu (pridajte to bicycle=yes), ale nechajte 'note'.

Not sure what this changeset is about, but relation's name was not in Ukrainian, so copying it to name:uk is nonsense.

Dlzku trasy (distance) treba zadavat v anglickom zapise cisel, s desatinnou bodkou, aby tomu aplikacie rozumeli.

Zdravim, a je to k niecomu dobre, ked po nich uz niet ani stopy?

Este aj na useku way/1066662808 je znacka "zosadni z bicykla".

Na Ortofoto nevidite dopravne znacky. Ano, cyklopruh (cyklopriechod) tam je, napriek tomu tam boli zvisle znacky, ktore ukoncili "cesticku pre cyklistov".

Can you prove that people have actively removed the border controls from OSM (in Schenger) and there is a global agreement on that? Just becouse the border controls are missing in OSM does not mean people have removed them. There is the possibility people have never put them into OSM within Schengen area because OSM is newer than Schengen area and people may have the same reason as you. But we have put some of those border controls in Slovakia and you are now removing them.

Even recently people are adding border control points and facilities like way/1002726506 . YOu can even see on geoimage.at imagery that the straight road is blocked by bollards so that all cars must pass along these buildings to be checked. Yes, the officers may pass some cars, but they check passports of some. I can confirm this happens regularly even recently.

Yes, some of the controls may be temporary but they may still happen. So having the information where it may happen is useful in OSM.
Yes police can stop you anywhere, but they cannot disinfect your HGV anywhere :) Also, there is a much lower probability of that than on the border.

Can you show Hungarian community is fine with the removals? Did they even notice it yet that you have removed the controls? You hide the removals under very vague changeset descriptions like "Schengeni kiigazítások" (e.g. changeset/161316247 ) .

So I suggest the barrier=border_control nodes stay in place but maybe you can find a tag that refines them to say not everyone is always stopped/checked but the possibility is there. People may want to plan their journey avoiding possible border controls and you deprive them of information where the controls may be.

To, ze tam nie je zakaz, neznamena, ze tam cyklisti mozu. Pokial viem musi byt explicitna znacka, ze tam cyklisti mozu (teda na chodnik). Inak tam nemozu ist ako bicykel. Teda mozu, ale ako chodci (rychlostou chodze). Cize aj ked tam bicycle=yes nie je, mozu tam ist, ale ako chodci.
Nedavame vsade bicycle=yes len preto ze by tam mozno cyklisti chceli ist, alebo ze je tam znacena cyklotrasa. Treba aj zohladnovat dopravne znacenie. Kde date bicycle=yes indikuje mi to, ze na danom useku mozu jazdit plnou rychlostou bicykla.

Aka je tam dnes dopravna znacka? Ja si to uz samozrejme nepamatam, ale ako vidite, dal som tam 'note' ze tam je nejaka znacka, co cyklocestu ukoncuje, a usek priechodu je explicitne znaceny ako 'nie cyklocesta'. Mne sa to teda javi v poriadku. Ale ak sa znacky zmenili, popiste mi co je tam teraz.

A inak je to bezna situacia, ze na priechode je cyklocesta (bicykel v modrom kruhu) ukoncena a za nim zase zacina. Takze podla mna na priechode nesmie cyklista jazdit plnou rychlostou a bud zosadne alebo ide rychlostou chodca.

To, ze cyklisti bezne jazdia rychlo aj po chodnikoch, kde to nemaju povolene, je druha vec.