sorry typo, from my understanding express lanes are usually tagged as toll:hov=no.

This is an honest question, why are you tagging some express lanes as toll=yes + toll:hov=yes when from my understanding express lanes usually get tagged as toll:hov=yes as per the wiki hov=*#Values .

Happy mapping,
Udar

I didn't notice the hashtag got copied over to this changeset, that wasn't intended.

I didn't notice the hashtag got copied over to this changeset, that wasn't intended.

I checked the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery in iD and on all of them it is within the road area in such a way that the current position is highly unlikely. Please double check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Thanks, I'll wait and fix things once (and if) imagery comes out for 2026.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Also does Northwest 170th street continue as dual carriageway further down than I currently have it as (like to Northwest 102nd avenue or even Northwest 96th avenue), or does the dual carriageway end roughly where I currently have it. I ask because while some of the details at this interchange are on the latest imagery I know of in the area, Northwest 170th street past a certain point is not very well defined on the latest imagery. I plan to go through an fix everything up to the best of my ability later in the year if Miami Dade releases new aerial imagery for 2026, but that is usually latter in the year.
Also, just as a FYI, the latest imagery in Miami Dade County available in iD is the "Esri World Imagery" not the Bing.

thanks

Does this mean that this DDI will open soon?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

on the latest aerial imagery available in iD this ALPR is still in the middle of the road area which makes its position highly unlikely, so please double check its position and updated it to be correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

on the latest aerial imagery available in iD this ALPR is in the middle of the road area which makes its position highly unlikely, so please double check its position and updated it to be correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Within several aerial imagery available in iD this surveillance node is within the road area, this makes its current position highly unlikely, please double check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Within all of the imagery I can view in iD at the moment the ALPR added in this changeset is within the road area and thus the position is highly unlikely, I am not saying it doesn't exist, I just don't think it is positioned correctly, I would just like you to double check the position of this ALPR.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

you didn't have to delete these, individual units can be mapped as individual address nodes as long as they have the addr:unit tag and these had it so they where correct. As long as the addresses haven't been changed I don't see anything wrong with how they where mapped.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

next time can you please leave a better changeset comment as the comment on this one doesn't really tell me anything about what you did in this changeset. A good changeset comments doesn't need to be to complex, something like "Updated the description of a business" would have been sufficient for this changeset. For more information on changeset comments see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping,
Udar.

As with your previous changeset the same applies:
- Next time please leave a changeset comment that better describes what you did in the changeset, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
- this changeset also adds duplicate information as facebook=*, instagram=*, linkedin=* are already tagged through contact:facebook=* etc

this time you also removed the height from the building that this business is attached to, next time please don't.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Yes, please change it if you can, I will not be able to do much for the next 9 hours as I am on the road right now.

Happy mapping.
Udar.

my bad I copied the wrong text, this was supposed to be:
"updated ref (and related tags) values of SR A1A in Broward County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"

my bad I copied the wrong text, this was supposed to be:
"updated ref (and related tags) values of SR A1A in Broward County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"

it does look like something is there so you should have kept the building, or at least tagged it as a wall or something else.

Happy mapping,
Udar.