This edit is incorrect, the merge lane was already mapped using tagging on the highway=motorway_link, encoding that with geometry makes the map worse by making it less useful.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

This edit is incorrect, the merge lane was already mapped using tagging on the highway=motorway_link, encoding that with geometry makes the map worse by making it less useful.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Also is this trying to represent a Airbnb or Vrbo listing?

Happy mapping,
Udar

The address listed in this changeset does not match the address of the building it is within, can you please double check the address. You have also put "Apt" in the hoursenumber, from my understanding that should be a number without any characters.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

I have added the ref back as you have not responded with evidence that this is no longer a Florida state road and I my self (along with others I asked for help with this) could not find any such evidence.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

I already fixed the dragged node in changeset changeset/180224885 , that lead to this changeset disconnecting the road and rail lines from the level crossing vertex, I have fixed that in changeset changeset/180230668 .

Happy mapping,
Udar.

why is the frequency on all of these 0?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

This one also has a few dragged nodes and two duplicate buildings, next time if a building already exists but has an incorrect shape please update the shape of the building as opposed of adding a new one on top.

Happy mapping,
Udar

also why did you remove the amenity, website and phone tags from way way/295187753 as that website seems to still be up?

Happy mapping,
Udar

I will prefice this with this is a minor nit pick and you can feel free to ignore this but, when I first read this changeset comment (without knowing you are part of the amazon logistics team) I thought that this was a changeset where someone didnt like a turn lane or their router had told them to turn left when they wanted to turn right (or something similar) and was editing OSM to try and force the router to give them the instructions they wanted to "fix" that. Essentially something like "removed oneway" would have been clearer in my opinion as a changeset comment.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Shouldn't the section of I95 that US 1 uses that SR 5 thus follows be tagged with the unsigned_ref of 5, so unsigned_ref=SR 9A;SR 5 . I ask as since the relation uses those ways, shouldn't they also be tagged as such.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

This changeset adds a duplicate business, next time edit existing features instead of adding a completely new business when one is already mapped. for more info see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element .

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Please updated the position of the ALPR edited in this changeset as it is in the middle of the road area in such a way that it is highly unlikely that it is correct. This applies under multiple aerial imagery sources.

Happy mapping,
Udar

There are a few issues with this changeset outside of the SEO description, The first and largest is that this removed the building=* tag from an area that very clearly represents a building. While this does have landuse=* on the tag now I don't think that the landuse=* tag is the correct to tag this type of feature. Also this building seems to be a townhouse, or something similar so there are likely to be multiple units per building, as such the business should probably not be tagged on the area its self but instead as a point. Lastly, the image=* tag should point to an image of the business its self (the building it is located in, the store front, the area its within) and not the logo of the business.

Happy Mapping,
Udar

From what I can tell peakbagger.com is a proprietary source that does specifically allow usage as a source for OSM contributions and thus cannot be used as a source for OSM contributions.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Also, just to make sure I correctly understand what this changeset is trying to do, these are supposed to be the points of highest elevation in each county?

what is your source for these points?

Happy mapping,
Udar

Next time please be more careful with alignment changes as this changeset ended up overlapping pedestrian features causing data issues. Plus usually buildings do not cover part of the road area like that. The building has not been built yet in the imagery either.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Thanks for this

Question, what is your source for this changeset, I ask because I spent several hours yesterday trying to check this, I didn't find anything that showed that FDOT had stopped designating this as SR 847, I dd se some things that show the Miami Dade county is not in charge of construction and maintanace on this segment of road, but it seems it is still designated as SR 847 by FDOT.

Happy mapping,
Udar.