OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
180691874

Thanks, I'll wait and fix things once (and if) imagery comes out for 2026.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180691874

Also does Northwest 170th street continue as dual carriageway further down than I currently have it as (like to Northwest 102nd avenue or even Northwest 96th avenue), or does the dual carriageway end roughly where I currently have it. I ask because while some of the details at this interchange are on the latest imagery I know of in the area, Northwest 170th street past a certain point is not very well defined on the latest imagery. I plan to go through an fix everything up to the best of my ability later in the year if Miami Dade releases new aerial imagery for 2026, but that is usually latter in the year.
Also, just as a FYI, the latest imagery in Miami Dade County available in iD is the "Esri World Imagery" not the Bing.

180691874

thanks

180691874

Does this mean that this DDI will open soon?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180656388

on the latest aerial imagery available in iD this ALPR is still in the middle of the road area which makes its position highly unlikely, so please double check its position and updated it to be correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180656417

on the latest aerial imagery available in iD this ALPR is in the middle of the road area which makes its position highly unlikely, so please double check its position and updated it to be correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180620558

Within several aerial imagery available in iD this surveillance node is within the road area, this makes its current position highly unlikely, please double check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180549385

Within all of the imagery I can view in iD at the moment the ALPR added in this changeset is within the road area and thus the position is highly unlikely, I am not saying it doesn't exist, I just don't think it is positioned correctly, I would just like you to double check the position of this ALPR.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180514550

you didn't have to delete these, individual units can be mapped as individual address nodes as long as they have the addr:unit tag and these had it so they where correct. As long as the addresses haven't been changed I don't see anything wrong with how they where mapped.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180462044

next time can you please leave a better changeset comment as the comment on this one doesn't really tell me anything about what you did in this changeset. A good changeset comments doesn't need to be to complex, something like "Updated the description of a business" would have been sufficient for this changeset. For more information on changeset comments see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180442920

As with your previous changeset the same applies:
- Next time please leave a changeset comment that better describes what you did in the changeset, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
- this changeset also adds duplicate information as facebook=*, instagram=*, linkedin=* are already tagged through contact:facebook=* etc

this time you also removed the height from the building that this business is attached to, next time please don't.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

172540889

Yes, please change it if you can, I will not be able to do much for the next 9 hours as I am on the road right now.

Happy mapping.
Udar.

180435390

my bad I copied the wrong text, this was supposed to be:
"updated ref (and related tags) values of SR A1A in Broward County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"

180435219

my bad I copied the wrong text, this was supposed to be:
"updated ref (and related tags) values of SR A1A in Broward County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"

180421239

it does look like something is there so you should have kept the building, or at least tagged it as a wall or something else.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180419353

This edit is incorrect, the merge lane was already mapped using tagging on the highway=motorway_link, encoding that with geometry makes the map worse by making it less useful.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180420630

This edit is incorrect, the merge lane was already mapped using tagging on the highway=motorway_link, encoding that with geometry makes the map worse by making it less useful.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

180333622

Also is this trying to represent a Airbnb or Vrbo listing?

Happy mapping,
Udar

180333622

The address listed in this changeset does not match the address of the building it is within, can you please double check the address. You have also put "Apt" in the hoursenumber, from my understanding that should be a number without any characters.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

179266000

I have added the ref back as you have not responded with evidence that this is no longer a Florida state road and I my self (along with others I asked for help with this) could not find any such evidence.

Happy mapping,
Udar.