it is good that the brand and brand:wikidata have been added but the addresses are still incorrectly formatted, for more info see osm.wiki/Addresses#United_States

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

where was this discussed?
I am asking because there are a few things off about this. The most important is that addr:street contains addr:postcode and sometimes addr:unit which should be split into separate tags. there is also the fact that these seem to be missing tags according to iD, specifically brand=Little Free Library
+ brand:wikidata=Q6650101.

happy mapping,
Udar.

where was this discussed?
I am asking because there are a few things off about this. The most important is that addr:street contains addr:postcode and sometimes addr:unit which should be split into separate tags. there is also the fact that these seem to be missing tags according to iD, specifically brand=Little Free Library
+ brand:wikidata=Q6650101.

This one also added a duplicate node (you added one at the position previously it seems) (for more info see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

happy mapping,
Udar.

where was this discussed?
I am asking because there are a few things off about this. The most important is that addr:street contains addr:postcode and sometimes addr:unit which should be split into separate tags. there is also the fact that these seem to be missing tags according to iD, specifically brand=Little Free Library
+ brand:wikidata=Q6650101.

happy mapping,
Udar.

forgot to link it in the changeset as a source but the video used is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjkPDpig6IA

I can't make and changes as the latest imagery in the area is from (in my estimate) early Jan of 2025 or late December of 2024 and thus does not have enough information to determine that and I do not have access to what ever internal source you have access to that gave you the info you used to make this change. you would have to make any changes.

happy mapping,
Udar.

also "..." doesn't really tell me anything about what you did in this changeset so next time please leave a better changeset comment describing what you did in the changeset. For more info please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

whats your source for this becuase from what I can tell HEFT is signed as turnpike not SR 821 and the unsigned_ref already has that number. Also if something like this is to be done it should be done along the whole run of HEFT.

happy mapping,
Udar.

Thank you so much for this, I just have one slight nit here. Can you please double check the alignment of node node/470508316 as the shape of way way/87383888 going into way way/913065350 at that point seems off to me (specifically the angle between the two ways seem off to me).

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

I drove by a few days back and from what I can remember the "Baptist Rehabilitation Hospital" is still under construction so the construction area should not have been deleted. The name is from signs on the fences separating the construction site so it is likely to be real. As the name is surveyed in once construction is complete it would still be useful to keep something around with the name.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

sidewalks should only be tagged on roads once sidewalks have been separately mapped. there is already work being done to add separate sidewalks in this area in https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I plan to complete that by the end of July or beginning of August so please wait until that has completed to tag these. I can guarantee that once that is done I will add sidewalk tagging to all roads in that area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

sidewalks should only be tagged on roads once sidewalks have been separately mapped. there is already work being done to add separate sidewalks in this area in https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I plan to complete that by the end of July or beginning of August so please wait until that has completed to tag these. I can guarantee that once that is done I will add sidewalk tagging to all roads in that area.

Happy mapping,
Udar

I have driven by here since I left this comment and I can confirm that the roundabout exists but not the rest, I would still like to see what y'all made this change off of.

happy mapping,
Udar