It'd be helpful to other mappers if you reduce the size of the bounding boxes of your changesets. That way people would be able to see what's changed in their local area. Also, it'd be great to use language that talked about the things affected (paths, houses, etc. rather than say things like "self intersection ways" which is never in a million years going to explain to the person who created it what they did wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy

@majkaz If after a few more days you haven't got a response to these and the same sort of mapping is continuing it ay just be that the user used a throw-away email address to sign up to MAPS.ME with (or doesn't understand English). Either way, you can try emailing the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org to see if we can get in contact somehow. Another possibility might be to try a an automatic Swahili translation of any messages (e.g. by Google Translate).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (from the DWG).

As mentioned by email, the list of changesets can be seen in the comment added to changeset/44403770 .

Force-reverting some further objects based on google.cn sourced data in China

Hello,
Can you explain what you were trying to do to relation/1152717 in this changeset and your more recent change? A changeset with no comment does not really explain it.
There previously were two South Ossetia / Tskhinvali Region relations, relation/4494580 and relation/1152717 but now there is only one.
If you believe that the situation here does not match the situation on the ground as per http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf can you please email OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org to put across your point of view?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

Hello,
Can you explain what you were trying to do to relation/4494580 in this changeset? A changeset with no comment does not really explain it.
There previously were two South Ossetia / Tskhinvali Region relations, relation/4494580 and relation/1152717 but now there is only one.
If you believe that the situation here does not match the situation on the ground as per http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf can you please email OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org to put across your point of view?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Workin Group.

Hello,
Can you explain what you were trying to do to relation/4494580 in this changeset? A comment of "Asia" does not really explain it.
There previously were two South Ossetia / Tskhinvali Region relations, relation/4494580 and relation/1152717 but now there is only one.
If you believe that the situation here does not match the situation on the ground as per http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf can you please email OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org to put across your point of view?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Workin Group.

For info, another one:
changeset/44388973#map=3/2.64/43.22&layers=H

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got into the data that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks Dewi.
learnosm's "sample.osm" used to turn up fairly regularly (see https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 ). It was fairly easy to spot because it used to have names such as "Happy Park" and "Cat Forest" in it. The recent examples were slightly different - buildings such as way/451299059/history look like they've been drawn near the learnosm sample data, but aren't actually part of it.
Best Regards,
Andy

@pitscheplatsch Does this (and possibly 43958066) still need reverting? Someone mentioned on IRC a few days ago that it might - There are a lot of deletes here and I'm guessing that the other one is a redraw.

Hello,
I'm not sure what happened, but node/3824820400/history was a school in the middle of the sea.
I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Can you explain what way/392993754 is? It doesn't have any tags on it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Is node/4444060192 supposed to be a joke, or are you trying to say that there really is a "memorial" at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Not sure what happened here but node/4526202694/history got added in the middle of the sea.
I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I don't know what happened here, but node/3590668378/history got added in the middle of the sea.
I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
Not sure what happened here, but you added a hotel in the middle of the sea node/3390520857/history . I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Can you explain what node/4158291366/history is? It's not in Peru.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Can you explain what node/4506047052/history is? It seems very odd.

Best Regards,
Andy