Here you say that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 is no longer disputed by Morocco. What evidence do you have for that?

Here you have changed the name of https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 from a mulitlingual version to just Spanish. Did you discuss that with both the Spanish and Moroccan OSM communities?

Here you have removed a couple of alt_names from Parsley Island https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/8692572 . Can you explain why?

Also, what does the changeset comment "lines" mean?

Hello Muskovian and welcome to OSM.
Can you explain why you deleted relation/9520115/history here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

You've got "type=multipolygin" in here.
You could argue that "claimed_by" makes sense, but it is only claimed by one person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%ADt_Jedli%C4%8Dka , not any government.

Hello,
I've moved the Hertfordshire Way and the other signed paths over to the parallel riverside paths in changeset/183021991 - does that make sense to you?
Best Regards,
Andy

(no bats involved!)

For completeness: https://www.mastersofgames.com/rules/bar-billiards-rules.htm :)
It does see to be going through a bit of a revival. I was in the pub when the one at changeset/116037001 was installed.

Thanks: changeset/182968648

Hello,
Are you sure that this still exists? The links on changeset/154996123 suggest "missing, presumed sunk".
Best Regards,
Andy

"bar billiards" even. "bat billiards" would be very different...

Thanks for mentioning it! It's not the first time he's done that. I've previously had to explain that Bat Billiards was a different thing to billiards: changeset/151567498 :)

@mueschel

> I'm pretty sure that there no dogs are served here.

I'll try and avoid channelling my inner Renfield (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDlFWoqU2_s ) but let me just say that you are incorrect here.

Many pubs are dog friendly. Some offer snacks for dogs, but this is the first that I've seen that _sells_ normally free dog snacks for £2.75 (you could probably get a butty for less in Uppermill).

How would you suggest tagging this?

Quoting railway=abandoned : "Former railway; the track has been removed but it's still visible that there used to be a railway". That's exactly the case here.

Uber are editing here again so it makes sense to fix the 3 routes to make it easier to spot breakage.
City: relation/12890344 in 2023: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2pUV relation check: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=12890344&noCache=true&_noCache=on
Eastern: relation/12812325 in 2023: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2pUW relation check: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=12812325&noCache=true&_noCache=on
Western: relation/12789722 in 2023: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2pUX relation check: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=12789722&noCache=true&_noCache=on .

Did you actually do anything here? I've fixed the gap and the kerb in changeset/182743252 .

To investigate the "what should be where" problems, I'd definitely recommend an on-the-ground survey. If your bosses are unwilling to bankroll that, then you might instead try looking for appropriately licenced photographs on e.g. Geograph or Mapillary.
Also please use OSM UK's Cadastral parcels for alignment - that will indicate a number of problems and help you fix them.
Finally - do raise problems you find in the UK forum - people _will_ help you!

Hello,
A few things have obviously gone very wrong in the vicinity of node/13817503042/history . These include:
* pavement crosses building
* pavement diagonally crosses kerb way (unlikely)
* gaps created in route relations (I've fixed those here)

And the Trans-Pennine Trail in the same place: relation/4139229#map=20/53.4026703/-2.9857982