Hi, this edit has gone very wrong.
You have created a routeable link through what is very clearly a private roads.
The bit through farm buildings should give a hint of this.
This and way/698314468 should be tagged as access=private. Remember the act of ordering something for delivery is an invitation to access private roads.
From my memory this is simply signed off the A53 with the name of a farm.
Cheers Phil

Hi, when using QA tools you should not take them too literally. Foot=designated is used by UK mappers on PROWs to indicate that foot is not only allowed, but is a legal right.
I consider that removing such tags is a loss of important information.
Please restore these tags as they are an important part of mapping in the UK.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. This is a shared driveway and should be mapped as highway=service, service=driveway, access=private.
When adding highway=residential please remember that it is highly unlikely that the mapper will have missed a road but they are unlikely to map private driveways.
Cheers Phil

Also why have you changed way/350314926/history to a tunnel ?

Hi, what evidence have you that these are signed as A roads?
I am local and am they are certainly not signed as A roads and it is very obvious that these changes will cause some very stupid routing.
In OSM we map what we see and this type of armchair edit is extremely unhelpful.
Cheers Phil

I was only joking with you, hope you enjoyed Offa's Dyke.

That part of Shropshire is very Welsh, driving out that way you feel like you are in Wales long before you leave Shropshire.

Trefonen is in Wales? :)

No response so reverting

Sorry about that, I will re add the lanes.

Cheers Phil

No response, so have fixed

Hi, welcome to OSM. This is a very odd changeset, please could you explain?
Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit look a bit strange and I was wondering why you have changed the lifeboat station into a ferry terminal?
Cheers Phil

Alwyn
I am soory but was not aware of you asking me a question, but if you can point me at it?

Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little bit wrong. You have added a name to a postbox, which cannot be correct.
I am reverting this change.

Hi Narod
This series of changesets have made this section of the A444 incorrect and very misleading.
Separate ways should only be used when there is a physical separation, which is not the case here.
If you want to represent lanes you should use lane tagging.
You have also broken the connectivity of footpaths, which no longer connect at osm.org/go/eu2oE9TpZ?m= and at osm.org/go/eu2oE4JoE--?m=
Also you have made the properties at the later location only accessible when travelling south, which imagery shows not to be true.
Please continue adding to OSM, but please do not add misleading information.
Cheers Phil

Please slow down and take account of existing mapping.
When adding way/701095360 and crossing way/166262202 you have ignored the presence of node/1777223086 and node/1777223094.
The service road should obviously intersect the footpath between them.
Cheers Phil

What source are you using to map the Kennet and Avon Canal Trail in OSM?

If there is no on the ground verification, and we certainly cannot refer to most of the other maps you have quoted, it is not helpful to map users to direct them to take the B4385.
At best this should be tagged as an unsigned:ref.
Cheers Phil

Hi
Please ensure that you are using the latest imagery and mapillary. The gaps were closed some time ago.
Cheers Phil

Hi, there is no need to add station to the name of a station. We know what it is.
I have restored the correct name.