Bore da, welcome to OSM.
This edit has gone a little bit wrong. The wikipedia tags for Powis were already correct, is there is a reason that you have added a wikipedia tag for Duntulm Castle, which is on Skye, n'est pas?
I am reverting this edit
Cheers Phil

Hi, this looks like a shared driveway, not a public residential road. Shared driveways are a common characteristic of current developments.
When adding residential roads in new build areas please remember that it is very unlikely that the local mapper who surveyed the area would have missed a public road.
Cheers Phil

Hi, thank you for replying. Use of mapillary is fine. I was concerned that you had used Google streetview based on your changeset comment where you said streetview. Putting that word in a comment will get alarm bells ringing.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit and any others in which you have used prohibited sources should be reverted.

We do not permission to use streetview under any circumstances, this should be part of the basic training which Amazon give.

However this changeset confused me, having local knowledge it seemed unlikely, however what I assume you are trying to map is visible in mapillary but this is not a legal restriction. The signs are temporary and look nothing like legal roadsigns.

This type of sign is an internal instructions to construction traffic and should not be mapped in OSM,

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.
The extent of the public highway was already correctly mapped.
This area was mapped by a survey, however Bing imagery clearly shows the kerb demarking the public highway/highway=residential.
Beyond that is a private shared driveway which should be tagged as highway=service/service=driveway.
Cheers Phil

Hi, Music Bros is already mapped and correctly tagged in the correct location.
Please do not add duplicates.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this is not a residential road. That is clear from imagery and it would be a bit odd to find a gate on a publicly accessible road.
This is a private driveway.
Cheers Phil

You have mapped parks in areas that clearly private gardens. These are not parks and should be mapped as residential areas.

Hi, in OSM we map what exists on the ground.
This area is not a park so I am reverting these edits.

Telford Town Park is already mapped, this is a duplication

Reverted

This is a residential area, not a park

These paths are simply doodles and do not exist on the ground. I am reverting this changeset,

Hi, in OSM we map what is on the ground.
This is clearly a Caravan Site, it is not a park.
I am reverting this edit.

Thank you for you edit, however please try to tag thing correctly and position them in the correct place. This is not a department store.
I have corrected the position and type.
Cheers Phil

Access tags are about legal access rather than ownership. This is for all practical purposes a public highway, with a toll.
What are you trying to achieve with this change?
Cheers Phil

Thank you for this addition, it is clearly a new residential area.
However when mapping please consider the existing mapping, in this case landuse, and adjust the residential area to incorporate this new development.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this should be tagged access=private. There are signs saying "Residents Only".

Cheers Phil

Also imagery suggests that there is not a ford here and the stream can be seen entering a culvert to the south.
Often when mapping in rural areas lwaterways need to be improved, OS Opendata Streetview is a good source for this.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.
Imagery suggests that there is only a single way here which had originally been mapped as a footpath. Rather than create a duplication, this should have been merged and corrected.
This a legally a public footpath, a right of way on foot only, so the access tagging can very easilybe deduced.
foot=designated
bicycle=private
horse=private
motor_vehicle=private

Hope this helps, Phil