Hi, this edit has removed existing data so has made OSM worse.

You have deleted semis mapped as building=house, where individual units are shown and replaced them with building=yes.

Remember you are working in an area with an active community and many things are already mapped. Please do not destroy the work of local mappers.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
Just adding buildings is pointless, its not as though in Cymru the emergency services do not have access to OS mapping, they are very unlikely to use OSM.
If you genuinely want to help OSM, although this area has active mappers, please add other useful information which is available from OS Opendata Streetview (layer in iD) such as farm names.
Diolch Phil

Bore da
This edit has missed important visual clues. Buildings way/1309836157 and way/1309836158 are not detached and way/1309836156 is clearly a conservatory so is never going to be stand alone.

Cheers Phil

Hi Will
The Red Lion was already mapped and you have created a duplication. The pub is clearly visible on the map at osm.org. In the editor it shows as a building area with a black beer glass. You can see the tags if you select the building.

Also the campsite looks a bit odd, in a residential driveway? I am guessing it should be the grass area nearby.

It is very unusual to map large objects, such as campsites, or pubs, as nodes. We tend to map these as areas to show the actual extent.

The garage only needs to be mapped on the building, there is no need for a node duplicating the information.

Cheers Phil

Hi
This edit has gone a little wrong.

Whilst the buildings maybe could have been improved they should not have been squared as the frontage clearly follow the curve of the road.

Buildings are not always square ,

Cheers Phil

Hi, don't you think it is odd to find an unmapped pub in a well mapped first world country? Especially one that clearly looks like a 1960s semi on aerial imagery?
Cheers Phil
I would certainly have checked the existing mapping and on doing so would have found node/879624400/history had been mapped 14 years ago.
Please be careful

Hi
Please be careful not to duplicate objects in OpenStreetMap.
The petrol station / shop and hotel are already mapped.

Cheers Phil

Thank you.

You may want to do the same for any others like this.

Cheers Phil

Hi
This kind of shows the futility of road relations beyond the first 99.

A relation should not be used to link objects with no logical connection beyond a name/ref, what next a relation for all the Railway Inns or Station Roads?

Cheers Phil

Hi Michael
Just curious why you say there is no access for foot or bicycle? Are there signs explicitly restricting bikes or pedestrians?

Cheers Phil

Reverted in changset #155288108

Phil from DWG

Reverted in changset #155288108

Phil from DWG

Hi, a swing gate seems very odd on a footpath. Are you sure it's not a kissing gate?

Crematorioum ?
I would also add Hospital (A&E)

Cheers Phil

Hi
This edit seems to have gone very wrong in a number of ways. What sources are you using as your en-US locale suggests you are not local?

The name tag should only be used for actual names, not as a placeholder for random information. It was this howler I spotted on my OSMand screen.

There is no service road here, there is a track on bing imagery but in no way is this a fire engine road, a most basic survey would show that it is too steep for fire access and it does not exist. However there is signage indicating that the road is a fire route and the yellow box should be kept clear.

Are you in some way employed to make these map edits remotely?

Cheers Phil

Hi
This edit has gone a little wrong. Maxspeed:hgv in Scotland is 40 mph, not 50.

Please ensure you are aware of which country you are editing in.

Cheers Phil

I have corrected the maxspeed tag to 60 mph and changed maxspeed:goods to maxspeed:hgv.

Cheers Phil

Unfortunately that wasn't a typo.

Cheers Phil

Hi, rather than remove the tracktype tag here wouldn't it be better to correct it?

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/941370 suggests tracktype=grade4 would be more informative for routers.

Tracks do however need specific access tagging, this is actually a byway so it is lagal to access on foot/horse/bicycle or in a car. An off-roader would certainly be interested in routing along here. Tagging as a grade4 tracktype provides information to routers not to route a road car here but a Landrover definitely.

Cheers Phil

Hi, what is the source of this edit?

There is no soccer pitch on any available imagery.

Cheers Phil