Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however there are a couple of issues.
It is still a building, area=yes on its own does nothing and is not needed on a building.
In order to render it needs a tag, rather than remove the shop tag it should be changed to shop=charity, if you want to clarify that further you can add an extra tag such as charity=furniture.
Just ask if you need any help doing that.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition however it looks like it should be a recreation ground rather than a park.

Thank you for making the corrections, however your changeset comment is still hashtaged, hashtags belong on twitter, not in OSM, thanks.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however the tagging appears to have gone a little wrong, it is easy for newcomers to make these mistakes.
You have said you have mapped a wood, and I can see a wood exists however you have mistakenly tagged it as a park. Would you correct that? Also the name looks odd too, according to OS Opendata the wood is called Lower Helsdale Wood.

The mapping of these also feels wrong. They seem to be existing car parks, so the tag should (if allowed, although there is a pretty big notice saying it must not be copied) be added a tags to the existing objects. However the site uses google maps which makes the data incompatible with OSM even if permission is given by the website.
Unless you have actually visited these places and confirmed that overnight parking is allowed I feel that this should be reverted.

Hi, mae hyn yn ddefnydd rhyfedd iawn o'r briffordd = preswyl. Fel arfer, ffyrdd sy'n arwain at ffermydd yn cael eu mapio fel naill ai annosbarthedig neu wasanaeth yn dibynnu ar amodau'r mynediad.
Hefyd dylai'r sylwadau changeset fod mewn iaith glir fel y gall mappers eraill yn deall, yna yn hytrach na twitteresque gobbledy gook.

Hi, this is a very odd use of highway=residential. Roads leading to farms are normally mapped as either unclassified or service depending on access conditions.
Also changeset comments should be in plain language so other mappers can understand then rather than twitteresque gobbledy gook.

Hi, I know the tagging here was inconsistent. But this section was probably right.
Kingsland Bridge and the associated roads are privately owned and not PROW hence access=permissive was correct.

Hi, should footway way/485430915 not connect to Bynner Street, rather than the Prince of Wales car park, it should also connect to the service road (probably needs parking_aisle too). I did spot some sort of path there yesterday after a couple of Threads to get a chinese. Will have to explore, but do you know its legal status? It looks a useful cut through.
Also what is Prospet House, it looks large and should probably have some sort of operator tag.

No response so reverting

Hi, welcome to OSM. Does this guest house have a name. It is very unusual for a business not to, also does it have a phone number/website?

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the actual source of these edits? The document you quote does not have specific permission for use.

Does this shop still exist?
The domain is for sale.

Hi Robert
I have already removed a similar node by this user from this location. The name 'Home' gives it away as a personal marker by a maps.me user.
This one should also be removed.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. The correct way to tag a field where sheep graze is landuse=farmland, although farmland is normally left blank.
For some reason you have made a mistake and tagged it as water, wont the sheep drown?

Can you walk between the two, or is there some sort of barrier?

As it is designated as a public_bridleway foot is very defiintely allowed, as are horses and bikes. The bicycle=yes tag is therefore pointless and adds tag clutter.

Hi, what is the source of this edit?
You have removed footpath L57 and the airport trail for example. L57 is a PROW and cannot simply be closed, it will at most have been diverted. Do you have any reference to this?

Hi, also spotted that you have used=ele=1, that means 1m above sealevel. The correct tag is layer=1, as already used on Eastgate Street North.

Hi, welcome to OSM
Thank you for your addition but please remember that changeset comments are intended to inform other mappers of your intent and should be in plain language.
Meaningless hashtag comments fail to do that, please do not use them in OSM.

Thank you.
It looked like spam, both the username and long description.