Does this cemetery have a name? It is unlikely to be just Cemetery.

Hi Martin, also remember that OSM is a geographical database. The map you see on the OSM site is just one, of many renders that are available and anyone is free to create their own if what they require something different.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for you contribution however there are a few issues.
Is there any evidence the names Berwick Grange and Sundorne Grove actually exist beyond marketing and estate agent speak. I have never seen, or heard, those names. Also please try to work with existing objects rather than simply delete (them and the history) and starting again. In redraing your new residential areas have now absorbed the footpaths that are in reality through a grass area, and connected the residential area to the path. Please be careful to keep highways and landuse separate, you have also deleted the grass area which surrounds this residential area.
The name of schools belongs on the area covering the grounds, rather than on the buildings.
Hope this helps and if you need any help or advice just ask.
Cheers Phil

The correct way to describe this is amenity=playground.

No response and very unlikely to be verifiable so reverted

Hi Martin
It is the area for which a plus bus ticket is valid. I will put it back if it was accidental.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I have disconnected the park boundary from the centreline of the road and also converted the parts to a multipolygon.

Hi, you seem to have deleted the Kidderminster Pay Scale area, why?

Duplicate reverted

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Sidewalks should only be drawn as separate ways if there is a physical separation. Then you need to make sure you make all connections, otherwise you will cause some very silly routing, The normal way to add sidewalks is to tag the road, sidewalk=both|left|right.

Hi, these are definitley areas of grass, certainly not parks so I have reverted this change.

Thank you for the explanation, it is fine,
Keep up the good work.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Deleting paths because they are private is the wrong way to go about things, they are a feature on the ground and should stay in OSM. If they are private they should be tagged access/foot/bicycle=private.
OS maps are copyright and should not be used even to check something. Use the evidence you see on the ground.
How did you clarify access rights?
I hope you understand my concerns, but in terms of copyright we need to be squeaky clean.

Hi, this looks a very odd edit. Please can you explain?

Hi, I think this has gone a little wrong. What you have tagged as a private park is actually a garden. I have removed this error

That looks good, thank you

Hi, we do not map airbnbs in osm. I am reverting this edit. It is also unlikely to be in the middle of the road.

Hi, the correct way to map aavement which is attached to a road is by the tag sidewalk=left|right|both. They should not be mapped as separate ways unless there is a physical separation. Mapping as you are doing breaks rendering and spoils OSM for its users. Highway=pedestrian is intended to be used for pedestrian streets in town centres, not to give area to footpaths. Your edits in this area seem to be crayoning for the renderer.

Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this edit has gone a little wrong, you seem to have added a caravan site which should be tagged as tourism=caravan_site but you have probably pressed a wrong key and tagged it as a park. Please can you correct it?

Hi, the YHA in Earls Court is already mapped. I am therefor removing your duplication.
I also doubt that Casa de Ania is in the middle of the road.