Actually Hamilton-Rototuna - JOSM cancel on an upload does not seem to work!

Actually Ngarua

Ironic I misspelled the changeset description

No worries, thanks for the fix.

Hi, your edit of way/115609854 looks to have wrongly placed a node in Hanlon Crescent.

No reply so I deleted duplicate and updated original peak with elevation

This looks (compared to LINZ Topo maps, available as a background in the iD editor) to be in the wrong place. There is an older peak for Mount Nicholas to the NE that looks to be in more correct location (but has no elevation). Additionally Mount should be spelled out instead of abbreviated. Also can you add a source for your changesets and use a descriptive changeset comment (not just your name)? Thanks.

Sounds good, cheers.

This actually seems wrong to me - it should also be tagged cycle=yes. As it stands it is now a walking only path.

Why have you changed the morotcross raceways to be tagged as motorways?

Also as previously requested can you please use meaningful changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Actually Matarau

Have you reported this user to the DWG? They seem to be consistently adding changes Id'd as vandalism under useless commit messages and don't respond to communication.

Can you please use proper comments on your changesets - 'S' is not descriptive.

This change appears wrong - you have roads short cutting around the roundabout and going through houses.

I see you've changed the skatepark to be tagged as a playground. As per sport=skateboard I believe the previous leisure=pitch was correct

Accidentally committed via import account, should have been under account 'ralley'

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, they look good to me.

You could look at deleting the previous address node for 18 March Place now that you have put the address on the building. Also you could connect the parking lot to March Place with a service way.

To follow the NZ OSM community you can look at talk-nz (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz just created and very quiet) or it's predecessor at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis

If they are used by cars then they shouldn't be tagged as paths - they are probably service roads. They definitely should not intersect building and need to be joined to the adjacent roads

Reviewed against LINZ and ESRI imagery and looks good

I can confirm there is a playground here, visited in 2017.

No additional paths needed, just move the end nodes of the existing paths so they are also part of the roads.