Changeset When Comment
55798908

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. It looks like the paths you added need a bit of clean up:
1) Some of them appear to be service roads and not paths
2) They are crossing buildings
3) Not connected to the roads

55873711

These paths look like they should be connected to the nearby roads - as they stand they cannot be used for routing.

55759735

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

55764311

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

55818583

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

55818626

Accidentally imported using my main OSM account, meant to import as linz_robA

54410317

Bridges tagged according to bridge=* following this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/nzopengis/TLcY6KL-tFE

54335739

I'm definitely no tagging expert but I wouldn't of thought they are needed and there don't seem to be any other examples using that combination of tags.

Seems strange that this is being rendered to look like it is above ground though. Is it to try and not render it that layer was changed to -5?

54335739

Should this be tagged "covered=yes" ? (as per landuse=reservoir)

54221075

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. As previously discussed there are some issues with your changesets in this area. Will yoube able to fix up the issues? (Nodes shared between unrelated ways; overlapped buildings with strange shapes; dubious council reserve; Cambrai park has a building in ESRI imagery; swimming pools not in imagery; park that just appears to be a front yard etc.)

54345953

Are you sure this is a residential road? It looks to be a driveway to me.

54344695

Is this really a park? from the ESRI aerial imagery it looks to be a household back yard.

54260506

Are you sure about a park being here? The ESRI photo imagery shows residential buildings

52767039

Inadvertently combined 2 changesets in JOSM, this also incorporates changes to reflect the extension of Herdman Street, Waterview which is under construction.

52394030

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Strange but correct that the road is Green Lane while the suburb is Greenlane. Well spotted.

52397568

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the correction. Looks fine to me.

52397702

Hi, thanks for adding the walkway but I don't think this should be tagged as footway=crossing and crossing=zebra (see crossing=*)

49976597

Whoops XXX should have been layer=* above.

49976597

My reading of XXX and bridge=* is that double bridging is actually the correct way to tag. Is my interpretation wrong? OSMose is also flagging this as wrong: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=18&lat=-36.900635&lon=174.715112&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=4110&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

51823707

Further looking at this it seems to be a partial duplicate of an existing Abattoir Lane (zoom right in and you can see both). Needs to be cleaned up