Bridges tagged according to bridge=* following this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/nzopengis/TLcY6KL-tFE

I'm definitely no tagging expert but I wouldn't of thought they are needed and there don't seem to be any other examples using that combination of tags.

Seems strange that this is being rendered to look like it is above ground though. Is it to try and not render it that layer was changed to -5?

Should this be tagged "covered=yes" ? (as per landuse=reservoir)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. As previously discussed there are some issues with your changesets in this area. Will yoube able to fix up the issues? (Nodes shared between unrelated ways; overlapped buildings with strange shapes; dubious council reserve; Cambrai park has a building in ESRI imagery; swimming pools not in imagery; park that just appears to be a front yard etc.)

Are you sure this is a residential road? It looks to be a driveway to me.

Is this really a park? from the ESRI aerial imagery it looks to be a household back yard.

Are you sure about a park being here? The ESRI photo imagery shows residential buildings

Inadvertently combined 2 changesets in JOSM, this also incorporates changes to reflect the extension of Herdman Street, Waterview which is under construction.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Strange but correct that the road is Green Lane while the suburb is Greenlane. Well spotted.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for the correction. Looks fine to me.

Hi, thanks for adding the walkway but I don't think this should be tagged as footway=crossing and crossing=zebra (see crossing=*)

Whoops XXX should have been layer=* above.

My reading of XXX and bridge=* is that double bridging is actually the correct way to tag. Is my interpretation wrong? OSMose is also flagging this as wrong: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=18&lat=-36.900635&lon=174.715112&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=4110&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

Further looking at this it seems to be a partial duplicate of an existing Abattoir Lane (zoom right in and you can see both). Needs to be cleaned up

Correct way to handle a private road would be to add access=private as per access=*

Changeset description is wrong - this was scrub not Forest

Comment should have been "Remove tags from outer way of multiploygon"

LINZ imports were originally discussed staring 17/08/12 on the imports list. The imports have been going on intermittently since this time as tracked through http://linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz/workslices/list/?ws_state=&dataset=&layer=river_cl&user=&order_by=checked_out_at
Documentation is at osm.wiki/New_Zealand_data_import_projects

Arggh, thought I'd re-connected JOSM with my interactive account. This was not an import.

Michael, LINZ importing is covered at osm.wiki/LINZ. There is nothing specific to river imports there though. I was not aware of the need for a dedicated account for import, will try and clear that up with the people overseeing the LINZ import.
Cheers, Rob.