Looks good, thanks. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have questions.

Yep—if 25mph is what's written on the signs for these roads, then you've mapped it correctly. Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Your edit looks good. Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I think way/995269878 is not a roundabout? See junction=roundabout#Possible_misinterpretations - It feels more like a junction=circular to me. Maybe you know more about this and can help clear up my confusion.

I'd also be interested in pointers to where this edit was discussed.

Are you sure? Looks like it's just a normal neighborhood playground to me, though I'm not familiar with the area

should ref=* really include the # symbol? I think it's just charter number 40437 thus ref=40437 - what do you think?

Thanks, looks good. Most (though not all) buildings are made up of right angles, so most editors have an option to square up the corners to be perfect angles. In the default editor, you can select an object and press Q on the keyboard (or right-click and find the "square" option) to do this.

I adjusted the outline of this building a little bit. Thanks!

Thanks. I'd note that, in addition to the name of the business, you should also add what kind of business this is. In the default editor, you can do this by clicking the "building" feature type at the tob of the edit sidebar, and then searching "yoga studio" or whatever the business in question is. I updated this one to a yoga studio based on the name you added.

Thanks for the edit! I did some cleanup work to fix the address capitalization and clean up the positions of things, but generally this looks good. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

@Glassman this looks accurate—the building is not square IRL based on aerial imagery, or at least the roof isn't. Thanks @Sierra%20DeFevers!

This edit incorrectly marked the entire lot as a huge building, and duplicated the business info. I cleaned up all the mess for you.

Thanks for the business details!

In retrospect, I'm not sure this is actually even a loc_name=*. But I don't know what else belongs here, so I think this should be fine for now.

Yeah no problem. Names are the sort of thing that seem deceptively simple at first, until you realize you need official_name=*, alt_name=*, loc_name=* and so on to accurately represent the messiness of the world 🙂

Thanks. Looks like this was already mapped at node/2522840408, so I removed the duplicate you added.

Thanks for the contribution! Are you sure this playground has a name at all? I thought "Wilburton Hill Park" was the entire park, not just this playground. Is there a sign to indicate that the playground in particular also shares that name?

This edit looks good; thank you and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out anytime if you have questions, or join us on Slack at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

This looks good, except that the phone number shouldn't contain any spaces. Use dashes for all the groupings, like so: +1-206-629-4330

I updated the phone number here, so this is good now.

Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Cool, thanks. Probably OK to leave as-is then.

> I think it makes sense to separate the cycleway from the street

Sounds good, I'd say go ahead.

> OSM community

I don't remember if I linked you to it already, but the OpenStreetMap US Slack workspace is super useful for asking questions about tagging, and learning about mapping-related events and making connections. I highly recommend: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

> looks like it went to a new changeset

Yes, for most editing programs, 1 upload = 1 changeset. It's rare to see an open changeset: usually it only happens if you catch it in the middle of an upload or editing session. Once a changeset closes you can add comments like these. But those are all technical details that you don't really need to keep track of; the vast majority of the time it's transparent to users