Looking closer at the examples I would like to comment on this one:
relation/1618116#map=12/48.9103/13.5324
This one is in my view way too complex and contains an awful lot of inners. I try to keep my MPs simple (below 20 inners) as I am aware of the increase in complexity they bring.

Hi bosseln, thanks for joining the discussion. I would really prefer if you two could agree on when to use MPs and when not to.

Archie made a, to me, valid point that MPs can/should cross a road if it is a woody area and the road is smaller than a trunk. In my view the forest came first and the road is merely an addition to it, not something dividing it. CartoOSM draw roads on top just fine. Power lines on the other hand merit other landuse-tagging because they are kept cut down. Similarly the sides of trunk roads are often kept down for traffic security reasons and should be tagged accordingly.

We have so many details still missing on our Swedish map. I would much prefer if you could focus on having fun mapping and diverge as little energy as possible to reverts and conflict.
Cheers

Thanks for extending this. On maxar there are paths in the area which are missing. Could you add those as well? Also please split the reservoirs in two as they are clearly not joined (besides maybe by a culvert)

Have you verified this on site?

This edit looks good, thanks!

Hej, visst pratar du svenska?
Jag undrar varför du mappar service=alley på vägar på landet? se service=alley för definitionen av bakgata
Jag skulle föredra om du taggar dem unclassified om inte vägen går till ett enstaka hus.

Also looking at your comments on your cs they are generally very lacking. You should really explain what you are doing/trying to do so others can help/review.

I agree with archie this should be reverted.

bosseln could you please stop deleting and reverting and focus instead on adding stuff that is missing in the next weeks until you gain more experience as a mapper?

maybe find a mentor? contact your local mapping community through one of the mailing lists and have someone help you learn how to do it right.

Hi, Welcome to OSM
What did you try to do in this edit?
It seems wrong to me as you deleted a lot of nodes.

Could you please elaborate?

Hi, you deleted a lot of address nodes in this edit.
Did you check beforehand with the german community that these nodes should be merged with the buildings?

Hej. Välkommen till OSM.
Denna ändring är korrekt, tack! Jag önskar mig att du skriver i kommentaren vad precis du har ändrat och varför. Då bliver det lättare för andra att kolla igenom.
Mvh

I support archie on this. Please discuss the relevant changesets before reverting anything. Reverting non-vandalism should only be done very seldom by experienced mappers who discussed the issue beforehand.

Hi, I really dislike this use of revert_plugin without discussing the issue first.

bosseln could you please elaborate, why did you revert this?

If we get no answer within a week from this user I think we should revert this back.

Hi.
You deleted tags brand:wikipedia in this edit. See here for details: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76301147
Could you please clarify clearly why?

Thanks in advance.

Got them from here: https://ens.dk/en/our-services/oil-and-gas-related-data/shape-files-maps
Unfortunately ens.dk does not specify a license for these files.
I wrote them today asking them to clearly state the license.

Hi.
Sorry for the late reply.
These areas are special because they are illegal to sail into if I understood correctly.
I have no problem with the change. We might want to add a source for the coordinates also but I forgot where I found them. Probably ens.dk.

Hi. I took a look.
Thanks for improving the map!
I personally dislike when woods are not drawn over the roads as this leads to ugly white stripes on the map.
Carto has no problem drawing roads over woodland so I prefer to ignore the roads when mapping landuse.
Also I prefer multipolygons when mapping large areas as it makes it easier to map adjacent landuse without drawing multiple ways on top of each other. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7SPb0JtheA
Happy mapping :)

Hej. Har du läst https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2278#issuecomment-473656155 ?
Vet du hur man skapar dessa polygoner utifrån kustlinjer i PostGIS så som föreslås?

Nu är den borta tack vara Archie. :)

Nej, jag raderar den här igen. I övrigt har jag läst upp på varför inga av dessa place=sea visas på OSM-carto i dagsläget. Se https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2278#issuecomment-473656155