Hi Mateusz.
Thanks for the follow up and tip about adding it to WD instead. I have not discussed it on talk-se and I like your arguments.

I have now removed them see changeset/69923836
Best wishes
pangoSE

Anvendte du overpass til til at finde dem? Jeg har lavet den her søgning som jeg tror viser sådanne som du nævner.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/IEC
Jeg fandt netop en her som jeg slettede: node/4692146112

Tak fordi du kigger efter i sømmene. Jeg anvendte dette værktøj: https://osm.wikidata.link/
Du er velkommen til at fortsætte arbejdet med resten af DK så holder jeg mig til Sverige hvor der også findes meget at gøre.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Imw
This seems to have them all and it looks quite good to me with huts in almost all ends.

Hi
I understand your concern. I made this overpass query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Imv
Does it show what you need to know?
(I recommend making overpass queries from within JOSM to download what you need)

Hi
Thanks for taking the time to write a response.
I dislike this practice for 3 reasons:
1) It clutters the relations and possibly hinders measuring the full length of the route
2) It is annoying to have these points in the routes e.g. when changing the points to buildings according to usual mapping practices.
3) It is not documented nor discussed what I know of and I have only seen it massively used here on these FIN*-routes.

I would prefer to delete this from the routes and generate the gpx files in a way that computes and includes nearby tourism=* or whatever you find relevant.

Personally I use OsmAnd to follow routes and there all the POIs show up with no problems so there is no need for the routes to contain this extra information.

Do you agree to deleting this extra information?

Hi.
Why did you put huts into the relations?
I have seen this elsewhere but this practice is not documented at all it seems and I wonder what good it is for.
Cheers
pangoSE

Hej
Could you add the relations you created here osm.wiki/WikiProject_Sweden/Hiking_trails#Nationala_leder?
Then we will have better overview of what needs to be done.

Hi KTim
Thank you a lot for your work :)
Could you please help update osm.wiki/WikiProject_Sweden/Hiking_trails when you improve the trails?
Cheers

Hi Mateusz.
Thanks for fixing the brand:wikipedia that I was not aware of.

What would you recommend instead of "private", "national"? It is not owned by one nation alone and unfortunately ownership=* is very unclear as to what is what. Maybe you could help improve that page so it is clear how to tag shared companies like this one with multiple states as owners.

Regarding the app:-tags I asked beforehand on TG Openstreetmap chat and got multiple thumbs-up and recently documented the tags here: app=*
I will discuss further edits like this on talk-se going forward.

Thanks for the heads up. I actually just copied from the rowhouses just below.

Hej. Tack för påminnelsen att dokumentera detta.
Jag har dokumenterad nu här website:stock=*
Samt bytt från live_stock->stock här:
changeset/66854982
Hoppas det bringer klarhet.
Respektiva kedjas hemsida har inte information om lagerhållningen. Denna kan i alla fall läggas in under osm.wiki/Tag:website=.

Hej ixpose.
Jag brukar inte tagga avverkad skog eftersom det i mina ögon är nånting tillfälligt.
Lyfta gärna frågan på svenska maillistan så kan vi diskutera vidare där.

I restored it according to your request. Using JOSM.

Hi.
Have you been on there?

Mvh
pangoSE

Hej.
Välkommen till OSM.
Jag brukar inte ändra i kartan vid avverkningar eftersom det inte ändrar på användingen av marken.
Kan du utveckla varför du tog bort taggen?

You deleted the snow-mobile road. Can you explain?

Good job.
Thanks for being clear why things were deleted.
Welcome to OSM :)

Va bra :)
Jag kan varmt rekommendera att du lär dig JOSM när du känner dig redo tex via video på YT eller learnosm.org eftersom den är förenklar det mesta jobb med databasen.