Auch ohne Gebäude hat das Gelände noch eine Anschrift. Der Baustofflieferant sollte auch in der Lage sein, die Adresse in sein Navi eingeben zu können.

Übrigens gibt es "preposed" nicht (deswegen habe ich das Objekt gefunden) und müsste "proposed" heißen.

You could upload it to any image hosting service like imgur.

Hi,
do you happen to have a picture of the socket you describe in the note? That would be really helpful.

Hi,
you added the new tag "TDX:date" here. If this is the date of your dataset, shouldn't this be in "source:date" instead of your day of edit?

I'm not the one who invented that tag, I just did a bit of cleanup here.

Please stop editing immediately. You're destroying a huge amount of information.

Hi,
I see that you're correcting name tags here - please wait a few days. It's likely that there will be a larger revert of these changes which is easier if the nodes are not touched again.

During the times not listed the normal access tag takes over. Currently it will be 'private' during every night.

It's
access:conditional = yes @ 08:00-19:00

You just use the access tag you would normally use, and add the time it applies after the '@'.

And have a look for the spelling: "conditional" with a single 'n'.

Hi,
the access tag you added here seems strange - it looks like nobody is allowed to access this street during the day. What are the actual restrictions?

Hi,
you invented new tags to classify the owner of businesses here. I would like to point you to a long discussion about that with a lot of arguments why this might not be a good thing to do:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-minority-owned-and-women-owned-businesses/

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
In your edits you added several tags that are notused in any other place. Please check the Wiki and the presets in your editor to see which tags are documented and in use in other places.

If you need help, feel free to ask in the forums!

Hi,
please check the parking tags you added. The ":side" in the key needs to be replaced by left/right/both.

HI,could you check the parking tags?

'parking:both:access:private' should be 'parking:both:private'.

Hi,
please check this way, it doesn't have any valid tags
way/1311117945

Hi,
these edits added several tags like "Nom: Occitan" that shouldn't be in OSM - the correct one would be name:oc

In addition you deleted many existing tags.

I suggest to revert all these edits and redo the correct edits in a clean way.

Reminder:

You added many tags here that are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use the tags that are defined in the wiki or available as presets in the editor - only these can be understood by other mappers and applications.

You're always welcome to ask in the forums in case you need help!

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
ou used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

To help keep the OSM database clean, I suggest to revert these edits, so that you can add them again with only proper tags.

Hi,
there was no information destroyed. All the ways had and still have absolutely identical tags. Otherwise I couldn't have merged them easily.

You're revert also reintroduced wrong tags like "maxwidth" (there is for sure no restriction on vehicles wider than 7 meters) or a "length" of hundreds of kilometers.

I reverted this pack of changesets with 58000 objects. It was early enough that nobody edited the objects in the meantime which made it easy. It might be that there was some intentional change you wanted to do which is lost now. Could you check that?