Something went wrong with this import. Where can we find the mandatory documentation?
There are many tags which definitely shouldn't be in OSM.
Before import it must be checked if the objects already exist in OSM - I found duplicates.

I suggest to revert this import so that it can be done again from scratch following all our import guidelines.

Hi,
what does "schoolroute=-1" mean? This tag is not used in any other place.

Hi,
what are these *_ref tags? Both are not yet used in any other place, and reference numbers are commonly tagged as "ref:***".

Hi,
something went wrong here, 13 nodes have just a bunch of foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM it seems.

Hi,
welcome to OSM. I noticed that you added many "service:abcd" tags. Please don't add this large amount of keywords to objects, use only the tags that are defined in the wiki or as presets in the editor.
OSM is a geo database, not a copy of the yellow pages or a place for SEO.

Hi,
"sleeping:cyclists" and "bench:sleeping" are tags that are not used in any other place. What makes these benches useful for sleeping and why specially cyclists?

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - 21 roads across Italy got a strange "way:creation" tag.
Could you check that?

Hi,
"maxtriaxleweight" doesn't exist as a tag.
There are
maxbogieweight:conditional = 18 @ (axles=3)
and
maxbogieweight:triple = 18

(I'd prefer the conditional tag)

Here are some of the tags you used with the proper ones:

age_gap=10
I don't know what this means. age range of children can be tagged with minage=1 and maxage=5

play_area=Yes
Could be playground=yes

sanitation = Pit Latrine
-> use toilets = yes and additional information using toilets:=**

staff_no=1
personnel:count or personnel:count are keys for that

water=Running Tap Water
water_supply = running_water
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/water_supply#overview

photo = files/childcare-facility_20250927100318260_image_0001.jpg
This doesn't help at all, because nobody can access this image

type = Private
should be operator:type=private

Hi,
you added a strange 'CDD' tag to many places - what does it mean?

I put some suggestions to the forums and asked for comments:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/survey-point-coordinates/144934

Hi & welcome to OSM!

In your edits you use tags like
lieu sacret = Fekh Gui
or
Montagne = Yallay Mbaner

This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it.

Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.

Let us know in case you need help!

Could you check your communication tags here? 6 of them are not used in any other place.

Here's a list of a couple hundred tags that have been used already:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=communication%3A

Hi,
could you check your sockets? You use "socket:type2_combo:current" for the voltage - this should be "socket:type2_combo:voltage".

"socket:type2_combo:output_400V" is not yet used in other places - usually we only tag the highest possible output. If we need such details, maybe a 'conditional' tag would be more versatile?
socket:type2_combo:output:conditional = 300 kW @ voltage=800; 150 kW @ voltage=400

Hi,
"mtb:feature" is new - do you plan to make a full documentation of this?

There are already some feature mapped using 'cycling', e.g. =dirtjump

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycling#values

Maybe there is also an option to have the scheme similar to what is used on skateparks?

Hi,
the coordinates of this POI seem wrong - this is a parking lot.

Please also check your wheelchair tags - "has_wheelchair_accessible_entrance" and similar don't exist. Please check the wiki for common tags, e.g. "parking:disabled" and "wheelchair" on the node of the entrance.

Das war jetzt nicht auffällig genug um meinen "Penetranzdetektor" auszulösen, sonst hätte ich schon einen Kommentar geschrieben. "_type" wird ziemlich gerne mal irgendwo drangehängt anstelle dem korrekten Tag das den Typ beschreibt.

Das ist dann aber doch nicht check_date (das wäre ja das Datum an dem es geprüft wurde) sondern "fixme = highway Typ zu überprüfen" - danach kann man ja genauso gut suchen und filtern.

Du hattest greprüft, ob das highway-Tag korrekt ist, es also wirklich verkehrsberuhigte Bereiche sind? Dann ist "check_date:highway" doch genau richtig. Oder meintest du etwas anders?

Es heißt ja auch "check_date:opening_hours" und nicht "check_date:opening_hours_timeranges"

OSM is not a database to lookup MAC ids. This information shouldn't be mapped.

Why do you think it is useful to tag the MAC addresses used inside the device? How did you get them and are you sure that all of them actually belong to this device and not to something nearby?