OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
155572790

Yes, I'll have a look. There are also several hundred buildings uploaded twice.

155572790

Please check your edits. You uploaded thousands of nodes that are not tagged any not used on any way.
You also added tags like these:
entity = street_light
street_light_type =vertical

They are not used in any other place. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

155401078

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "steps:both=separate" on an intersection node without any steps mapped nearby?

155523420

Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!

155277382

Alright.
Could you change the (new) tag to ref:CZ:vatin? country codes usually use capital letters.

155277382

Hi,
does this shop really have two different vatin numbers?

155336436

Hi,
it seems you accidentally uploaded a couple hundred objects without proper tags across the whole country. I'm going to remove them.

155174901

Please check your software - you added a couple thousand 'python = scripts/main.py' tags here.

154986641

Schau hier bitte nochmal nach, mit "highway" Tag fährt es sich besser :)

155003415

Hi,
the tag "place:vi-class" is not used in any other place.
I guess this is a local classification scheme for villages/hamlets?

I suggest to use the tag "place:VI" - country codes use capital letters. The same scheme is already in use e.g. in China: osm.wiki/Key%3Aplace%3ACN

154137398

Hi,
could you explain the access restrictions on this area? Currently this is a highway=pedestrian, that is not accessible for pedestrians.

155041340

Hi,
you used 10 new tags here to tag the years inscribed on this post. I would recommend combining them in one tag, separated by ';'.

I'd also suggest to use a more generic tag here: There are other types of memorials remembering a certain day, which don't need to all have their on key to tag the date. How about something simple like "memorial:date"?

155002234

Reminder:

You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

Let us know in case you need help!

154825394

Hi,
please check the ref tag on this object:
relation/8275821

154941737

Hi,
please check your recent edits. Something went very wrong here - the objects didn't get any proper tags, but just a large list of questions.

154948019

We should list values only in exceptional cases, so having a long list is not really a problem. I'm pretty sure we'll find cases with no fixed step size. In that case we need to use :values and can't use :interpolation. E.g. a sign that shows 80,100,110 can't be described using :interpolation.

I guess this feature is used so seldomly that it's no problem having a longer list and doesn't warrant having two different keys.

154763123

> würde man dann bei hazard:bicycle:both_ways oder hazard:bicycle:both landen?

Weder noch. Ganz einfach "hazard:bicycle". Vergleiche mit einem Tag wie maxspeed: Ohne Suffix gilt es in beiden Richtungen.

left/right bezieht sich immer auf die Seiten eines Objekts (nicht mit dem Begriff Strassenseite für Fahrspuren verwechseln), forward/backward auf die Spuren selbst.

154948019

"maxspeed:variable:values" sounds like a good tag.

It's definitely not an "interpolation".
Even "interval" doesn't seem a good choice, because I doubt that all signs use values in regular intervals.

154812914

Hi,
regarding the "harassment_prevention" tags, there's a discussion about something that seems very similar in the forums, in German.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/schema-retreat-yes-fur-notinseln-kelly-inseln-renovieren/114170/12
Maybe you could try to join that?

154462746

I reverted this import: Most of these nodes overlap with already existing POIs.