mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172132020 | Feedback:
|
|
| 172080201 | Ich hab hier ein foot=yes draus gemacht, da Fußgänger nicht verboten sind. |
|
| 172152676 | operator:type=marina gibt es nicht: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=marina
|
|
| 172152615 | operator:type=marina gibt es nicht: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=marina
|
|
| 172152569 | operator:type=marina gibt es nicht: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=marina
|
|
| 171930169 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171562549 | Your changeset comment reads “corrected color "grau" -> "grey"” and it does not say that you did not check it.
|
|
| 171562549 | I mean, check this one: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/WFOberweyer?lat=50.46011149999998&lng=8.089372000000026&z=17&pKey=3934798130093284&focus=photo&menu=false&x=0.5228815101750337&y=0.516539112908242&zoom=2.907488871250912 It's definitely browner than any grey tones. |
|
| 171562549 | It could mean that the value itself was already incorrect and your change now implies that you have checked that it is now correct. One random example: Metal can have many colors, but this hydrant cover is not gray in any world: node/12252900170
|
|
| 171562549 | The exception applies to a typo, not a translation. |
|
| 171562549 | The only way to confirm your feeling would have been to ask the community. My main concern is that a changeset spanning three countries is simply unnecessarily large. It could have been divided into federal states in a maximum of 5 minutes and into districts in a maximum of 10 minutes. |
|
| 171562549 | Maybe, but the Automated Edits CoC also applies here, which was definitely not observed - or where can I find the discussion about this in the community?
|
|
| 171557178 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171754129 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171849627 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171562549 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171869015 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171924898 | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 171540670 | Danke dir! |
|
| 171540670 | Hi, braucht es hier wirklich eine Conditional Restriction bei den Verkehrsarten? |