ika-chan!'s Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 186184030 | Hello, I had to undo the changeset because you added road numbers that gave an impression that the connecting roads were motorways or expressways, when they are really not. The road numbers (ΣΟ581, ΣΟ583 and ΣΟ585, after "Συνδετήρια Οδός") were already covered under the tag loc_ref=*. |
|
| 186179606 | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-edits-here/4223/240 |
|
| 186007060 | The changeset comment parser seems to autocorrect "highway = *_link" badly. |
|
| 185937226 | For context, all three main imageries (Bing, Esri and Mapbox) do not show the filter road. If the change in road layout occurred very recently, please use source="Survey of 2026-MM-DD" on affected ways and do the same for the changeset's source. We err on the side of caution due to a history of unsourced road layouts by a different user. |
|
| 184877872 | Hi, the road removed can be confirmed with Mapbox Satellite imagery, as of 1 July 2026. I have reinstated the way with the source=* tag added, in hopes that any confusion will be reduced. |
|
| 184128084 | Due to lack of reply or explanation (like providing evidence of physical separation), part of the changeset (at coordinates 40.396315,-1.189155) was undone at changeset/184800944. |
|
| 184704918 | Hello, Please do not map slip roads separately like what you did at coordinates 39.624275,22.508955, unless they are physically separated by something like road markings, a kerb median or a grass median. |
|
| 184468398 | Hello, I think we do not map the N-10 road as a dual carriageway (at coordinates 47.714035,1.014215), if there is no physical separation between the carriageways. Please see osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway for more information. If the road was recently converted to a dual carriageway with physical separation (like a barrier, kerb or grass median), please let us know below. |
|
| 184128084 | Hello, I think we do not map the road as a dual carriageway (at 40.396315,-1.189155) if there is no physical separation between the carriageways. Please see osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway for more information. |
|
| 183465052 | Hello, you are putting the English language names in the wrong tag: the Greek name goes to name=*, while the English name goes to name:en=* or int_name=*. |
|
| 183411613 | The question is the same for demolished roads incorrectly mapped as "abandoned", like way/1524714856. |
|
| 183411613 | Hello, the filter roads at way/1524714841 and way/1524714840 do not exist - why do you continue to do this? |
|
| 183292292 | Hello, OpenStreetMap naming conventions are not always the same as other map services. I think we agreed to leave out the "Εθνική Οδός" prefix from name=* and either ignore it or put it in name:prefix=* instead. |
|
| 183292292 | Hello, we do not use prefixes (e.g. Εθνική Οδός) on name=*: therefore, name=* should be "Πατρών - Πύργου" and not "E.O Πατρών - Πύργου". The prefix can be specified in name:prefix=*, but please spell it out in full (e.g. Εθνική Οδός and not E.O.). |
|
| 183257695 | Please explain why you add a filter road that does not exist (way/1523547019)? The road is actually blocked off because of the new motorway. |
|
| 183209103 | Hello, the service road at way/1522688629 has been removed because there is no physical separation (not even hatched lines), according to Mapillary imagery: please only map roads that physically exist. |
|
| 183175923 | Hello, you are putting the English language names in the wrong tag: the Greek name goes to name=*, while the English name goes to name:en=* or int_name=*. I fixed it for you but please keep the name tagging conventions in mind. |
|
| 183034504 | You are continuing to add filter roads that do not exist, like what you did at way/1518767028. Why are you still doing this? Please stop it. |
|
| 182968842 | changeset/182968842 was undone for changing road type against consensus: please see osm.wiki/Greece/National_Roads. Roads of the secondary network are generally highway=primary. |
|
| 182889395 | I am asking you again not to add demolished roads as "abandoned", like what you did at way/1517147392: why are you continuing to do this? |