Hello, I think we do not map the road as a dual carriageway (at 40.396315,-1.189155) if there is no physical separation between the carriageways. Please see osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway for more information.

Hello, you are putting the English language names in the wrong tag: the Greek name goes to name=*, while the English name goes to name:en=* or int_name=*.

The question is the same for demolished roads incorrectly mapped as "abandoned", like way/1524714856.

Hello, the filter roads at way/1524714841 and way/1524714840 do not exist - why do you continue to do this?

Hello, OpenStreetMap naming conventions are not always the same as other map services. I think we agreed to leave out the "Εθνική Οδός" prefix from name=* and either ignore it or put it in name:prefix=* instead.

Hello, we do not use prefixes (e.g. Εθνική Οδός) on name=*: therefore, name=* should be "Πατρών - Πύργου" and not "E.O Πατρών - Πύργου". The prefix can be specified in name:prefix=*, but please spell it out in full (e.g. Εθνική Οδός and not E.O.).

changeset/183297813

Please explain why you add a filter road that does not exist (way/1523547019)? The road is actually blocked off because of the new motorway.

Hello, the service road at way/1522688629 has been removed because there is no physical separation (not even hatched lines), according to Mapillary imagery: please only map roads that physically exist.

Hello, you are putting the English language names in the wrong tag: the Greek name goes to name=*, while the English name goes to name:en=* or int_name=*. I fixed it for you but please keep the name tagging conventions in mind.

You are continuing to add filter roads that do not exist, like what you did at way/1518767028. Why are you still doing this? Please stop it.

changeset/182968842 was undone for changing road type against consensus: please see osm.wiki/Greece/National_Roads. Roads of the secondary network are generally highway=primary.

changeset/182997694

I am asking you again not to add demolished roads as "abandoned", like what you did at way/1517147392: why are you continuing to do this?

Hello, will you please stop mapping "old" roads that have been demolished, like what you did at way/1516440171, way/1516440169 and way/1516440167? It does not add anything to the project and they are more suited to OpenHistoricalMap than OpenStreetMap proper.

Hello, if the road is separated only by hatched lines, you should map that road as a single way, and not separately for each direction like what you did at coordinates 37.4004511,22.2135618.

The request has been actioned.

Why are you continuing to add filter roads that do not exist? Also, you should not be guessing stop signs and give ways signs without surveying: there is no give way sign at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1574979849980726 .

changeset/182764801

Hello, we don't delete private roads, we instead tag them as access=private to block public access: please see osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property for more information.

The proposed road at way/690813874 was also pulled due to insufficient progress in years. IMO, it only makes sense to add proposed roads when the construction contract is signed and construction is imminent.

I have reminded you many times not to add junction layouts that do not exist, like what you did at way/1513020827 and way/1513020828. These actions raise suspicion that this account may have been created to get around other accounts that were blocked for similar reasons. Please explain why are you continuing to ignore concerns from me about junction layouts?

While the new roundabout is correct, the filter road at way/1512038018 did not exist. Please only add corner filter roads that physically exist, as in those separated by a kerb or hatched area.