Laut OSM Wiki ist 'building=detached’ “Ein einzeln stehendes Einfamilienhaus”.
Diese Gebäude um den Schlosshof rum sind nicht bewohnt.
Isch OK, wenn ich das wieder rückgängig mache?

Those three ways definitively aren't buildings.
On none of the available images I was able to decide what kind of landuse they are, I thus deleted them in changeset changeset/112837677

Die Relations habe ich versucht mit changeset/112686421 und changeset/112686565 wieder zusammenzusetzen.

Die Routen durch die Kreuzung sind durch die Expansion derselben unterbrochen. Ich arbeite daran.

Ciao valou85jack
User Amilopowers surveyed this road to have the name Burgunderstrasse in 2018, did that name change on the ground.
Or did you only look at the Swisstopo map?
The map of Bern has this street unnamed by the way: https://map.bern.ch/stadtplan/?grundplan=stadtplan_farbig&koor=2596716,1198680&zoom=6&hl=0&layer=

Greetings,
habi

BTW: We’re not allowed to copy from Schweizmobil: osm.wiki/Switzerland/Datasources, see ‘Not-compatible data sources’

Hey!
I came here from Reddit’s thread about the 3D buildings (https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/pz6cnf/in_open_street_map_not_updating_my_contribution/) and think your the same person that posted the question.

Some comments about your mapping here; the ‘ele' tag is for the elevation above sea level, and probably not 3 for way/988525495.

Additionally you should give your changesets meaningful comments, and not just single letters.

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

And more meaningful changeset comments would be good, too.

Super, Mersi!

Dieser Defi steht hier wohl kaum in der "Via Muraccio".
Sondern mitten im Feld.
Müsste wohl korrigiert werden...

You cannot modify this changeset (111574904).
In which changeset did you make the corrections?

Ciao fkMohr

Der Link zum Bild ist (für mich) nicht erreichbar, evtl. ist Google Photos nicht der beste Ort dafür.

Die Kosten des Parkplatzes kannst du mit `fee=yes` festhalten und mit dem `charge`-Tag präzisieren: osm.wiki/DE:Key:charge

Gruss aus Bern,
habi

I way/766094785 really passing *through* the building way/766094785 ?

If so, the relevant part of it could be tagged as 'building_passage' or simply as `covered=yes`.

I changed *one* of your nodes to how I understand it correctly: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111576634

Please, don't just add some random data and invent tags!

Hey!

You're adding all these shops wrongly to OSM.
Bike repair shops should be added as 'shop=bicycle' and not as `amenity=Car Repair Shop`.
Additionally, you can add the relevant 'repair' tags from the shop=bicycle

We've talked a long time ago about a big import of buildings you performed, but you don't seem to have learned anything.

Please take good care when adding data to OpenStreetMap.
Your data does *not* really add information in a good way, e.g. which can be consumed by others.

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

Ciao Pan
I came by your changesets due to https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Switzerland :)
Would you mind putting 'real' changeset comments into what you do?
The last few days you're only mentioning "Orsières adresses", but only touching forests.
Greetings from Bern,
habi

Wegen note/2851926

Mersi für die Korrektur der uic_ref ;)

Ciao Monica
In this changeset you've added lots of buildings with a (wrong) tag `biulding`.
I corrected this to `building` in changeset changeset/110156173
Have a good day,
habi

Ciao cmitpenfield and welcome to OpenStreetMap

It's nice that you added yourself to OSM, but we're not here for SEO, so I updated your listing with the correct tags, making them machine-readable and usable for all data consumers of OpenStreetMap.
My edits are found in this changeset: changeset/110156007
Have a good day,
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS: I came here from https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm, triggered by your 'video 1'-tag :)