1. About adding fake names: I never used mapy.com/freemap.sk, but mapy.com allows to add photos to arbitrary place, even without OSM entity. For example: https://mapy.com/en/turisticka?source=osm&id=1040698144&sourcep=foto&idp=3919240&x=45.5003272&y=42.3957546&z=15&ovl=2
Guess, that desired functionality is possible for points/polygons, but unavailable for linear objects.
Anyway, adding 'name' to object without name to get specific behaviour (in some renderers), that doesn't connected with 'name' directly - is 'Tagging for the renderer', as I understand.
I will ask more experienced mappers to comment this.

2. About absent bridges: yes, quality of map for Georgia is relatively poor. It's ok to map places using satellite/orthophoto images and it's ok to improve/fix a priori wrong data, even to not-totally-correct state, but here new wrong entities were added (I checked history), so I'm asking, how this happened to determine whether similar mistakes possible and to fix it.

3. About zoo: big dogs, that defend sheeps/territory, is known problem for hikers in whole Tusheti, but this cannot be reason for adding zoo point. OSM used not only by hikers. Imagine for example if somebody asks AI chatbot 'How many zoos are in Georgia/Caucasus?'. Propose to delete zoo for now. Possibly OSM needs something similar to angry_dog tag, but in case of Tusheti we will neeed to mark half of the region with such tag)

Thank you for verbose response.

1. Adding name tag to entities without name close to osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer, IMHO.
BTW, what exactly external maps do you mean? MB another approach exists.

2. About absent (I said nothing about destroyed) bridges:
I mean https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1545348441 and https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1545348443 - I was there <2 weeks ago and there were no even traces of bridges. You added bridges there at the end of July, are you really saw it?

3. About zoo: I don't know what object there, so can't propose better-fitting tag. Whether this is just shepherds house with dogs, guarding nearby territory?

For history see:
node/7093005511/history/4
I rename mountain back to Amugo according to wikipedia article (which mention both names, but main and newest mentions in encyclopedias is Amugo).

Some village names was edited in this and my next changesets:
Sachigholo/Sachighovlo, Gogrulta/Goglurta, Indurta/Indirta.
As prooflink:
https://mega.nz/file/R1VHTQqb#qVq2DJ1_4FsCXMxxn6sIHKQ-IEyeGyX0rUSmnVHS78c

Hello, some questions:
1. Is really zoo there node/14074580605 ?
2. Why you've added 'name=bridge' to bridges (example: way/818125619).
2b. BTW, default name tag must contain name on georgian language in Georgia. See osm.wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Names_conventions
3. Seems you've added bridges, where they absent (one was here node/14104668764 for example). Why? Are there another such cases?

Return previous name in changeset/187668706

Why 'Охкури' was changed to 'Оххури'?
See also https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Охкур

I've fixed 'name:en'.
Pass named after girl with name 'Nadya', Word 'Нади' is correct (peculiarities of russian grammar), but similar situations translated using "main" form of name usually.

Don't know, how name:ka must looks like and what variant must be placed in 'name' tag for border points.

Sorry, but where did you find such names (especially name:ge)?

I understand, that name "Молчечнорт" was initially added 9 years ago by somebody else, but you specified 'Genstab' as source of data and seems it named 'Малчечкорт' there. See also: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Малчечкорт
and GGC: https://nakarte.me/#m=15/42.73857/44.71397&l=O/K&nktl=ayZy8N-kLtyvSR_BWRNRWQ

I've reverted this changeset (see changeset/186563009).

Let's check thoroughly, before submitting such massive changes.

The problem not with naming, but with locations of the points. There are no passes *at all* at places, where you marked it. Check topo maps (i.e. with height levels) for example.

More examples:
1. Sofrudzhu Yuzhnyi (node/14042104637) with height 3283m placed almost inside village at the level ~1330m. The real pass: node/4462074525

2. Okrila (node/14042104663) with height 3100m placed near the river on the height ~1800m. NB: guess, there is mistake in caucatalog also. As I can see on photo there Оксана/"Oksana" pass was meant (which must me somewhere near Khazny glacier relation/8083105).

3. pass '46th army' (node/14042106294) have meaningful 'name' tag, but obviously wrong names on other languages (and even 'name:ru' tag). Location also wrong.

In fact, I'm unable to find at least one correct point. How did you do this changes? You specified source as 'survey'. According to OSM wiki "This means the author was physically nearby the object", but you edited 373 passes, I'm doubt, that you were near all of them.

BTW, changeset message is "Added label in other languages ...", so editing of existing points is expected, but (almost) all points are the new one.

Didn't check all changes, but possibly even safer to revert whole changeset.

At least some of passes here have absolutely wrong locations.
See for example:

1. Nenskra Zapadny (node/14042104639)

2. Shirokoe sedlo (node/14042106265)

3. Nakhsvi (node/14042106208)

One relation is better. I meet relation:street for the first time, so avoid editing.
BTW, as I understand, need to add sidewalks to this relation also.

Thanks, don't know, how can I miss this. Possibly because .tm is top-level-domain for Turkmenistan.

Hello, seems this changeset is wrong. See
changeset/181362737#c1584520

Deleted addr:street tags contained wrong info, so I have right to delete it.
Compare:
ვახტანგ ბოჭირიშვილის ქუჩა
ვახტანგ ბოჭორიშვილის ქუჩა

This is good example of why relation better, than addr:street on each building.

Hello, JOSM complains on relation/16895285:
he said, that role should be outer.

I don't understand, what did you want to draw here and why need to map simple rectangular building as multipolygon. Fix this JOSM error please.

Was wrong date in message.
Jan 2025 -> Jan 2026.

I returned street names for buildings, that have it before my changes as promised. Still decide to leave these buildings inside relations.
See changeset/177804687