danieldegroot2's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 135561551 | See also:
|
|
| 135793425 | ||
| 135573656 | Hey houtari, Yes, it does suggest this for buildings. However, it could become ambiguous which aspect is disused. Another mapper may think the museum is disused, as this is a non-physical tag, and change it to disused:tourism=museum .. as to avoid this it may be better to, as recommended otherwise, only add the lifecycle tag to the part which is no longer relevant - in this case, the milk churn stand.
Regardless, as data user, you should use both disused:*=* and disused=* in your queries, as both of these tags are in use to describe something being disused. There may still be outdated tagging, exceptions or accidental mistagging.
|
|
| 135554764 | See also
|
|
| 134470681 | ||
| 135445440 | See also (use for reference only!);
|
|
| 135429979 | Just try searching for a bit. Anyhow, could you please keep changeset comments related to the changeset? The rest can be discussed in DM. |
|
| 135429979 | See also Já 360° götusýn:
|
|
| 135278085 | See also this document for an image of the former milk churn stand;
|
|
| 133952557 | Hey Anne, There is good aerial and street level imagery available here; the latter clearly shows a low, triangular stand rather than a high, square one. As such, I've replaced the wikimedia link (2012!) with a Mapillary link. See
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 135064716 | Hey ftrebien, Please explicitly mention any sources you are using in the changeset source field when saving your changes. Sources like "more recent maps" and "various photos" are unclear and as such not verifiable.
Note, sources may or may not be compatible with the license OpenStreetMap is using; aka we may or may not be able to use the data in OpenStreetMap. See
As noted on the OSM Wiki, not all data sources listed there are known to be compatible.
- Data sources available in the (Rap)iD or JOSM editors by default in their imagery or data menu are allowed to be used for mapping in OSM.
Note, I can't give legal advice nor guarantee anything is ok to use. If you are unsure if you are using compatible sources, please contact the Licensing Working Group.
If you are using incompatible sources, please contact the Data Working Group to have it reverted.
This message is just for your information. I assume you are using compatible sources. I also invite you to check out the (global) contact channels if you haven't yet.
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 116081306 | Hey Tilia_J, Kijk wanneer je tijd hebt even; Is dit een beschrijving, of een echte naam? ('Rhederoordse spreng')
Groet, Daniel |
|
| 96547653 | Hey Tilia_J, Kijk wanneer je tijd hebt even; Is dit een beschrijving, of een echte naam? ('oude spreng')
Groet, Daniel |
|
| 134423672 | Nvm, I've changed my mind, let's keep to description only. |
|
| 134423672 | I assume it was built as memorial. Victor might know a good way to tag the physical and commemorated subjects independently here. Since I have a moment, I'll send them a PM. Regards, Daniel |
|
| 134420079 | Newer Geograph images do not seem to be imported to Wikimedia Commons.
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 134423672 | *Wikimedia Commons for reference |
|
| 131605018 | Thanks for clarifying :-) |
|
| 131605018 | Where exactly is it located? Couldn't find it on Mapillary yet. There may be a route marker to the east/right;
|
|
| 133793004 | I understand your reaction. I'm sorry if it comes across as one.
I'm aware the changes you are doing are not changing much, they're more reverting incorrect changes. Still, it'd only be reasonable to use the local sources which the local community has agreed upon for best practice. I hope this helps to clarify things. |