Hey Tilia_J,

Kijk wanneer je tijd hebt even;

Is dit een beschrijving, of een echte naam? ('Rhederoordse spreng')
- way/59177326
- way/59176799
- way/59176848
-beschrijving met "description" of relatie ipv "name", echte "name" met eerste letters een hoofdletter natuurlijk-
Dit verschilt van de bijbehorende lijn.

Groet,

Daniel

Hey Tilia_J,

Kijk wanneer je tijd hebt even;

Is dit een beschrijving, of een echte naam? ('oude spreng')
way/781380189 en bijbehorende relatie.
-beschrijving met "description" of relatie ipv "name", echte "name" met eerste letters een hoofdletter natuurlijk-
De andere weg in de relatie heeft overigens nog geen naam of beschrijving.

Groet,

Daniel

Nvm, I've changed my mind, let's keep to description only.

I assume it was built as memorial. Victor might know a good way to tag the physical and commemorated subjects independently here. Since I have a moment, I'll send them a PM.

Regards,

Daniel

Newer Geograph images do not seem to be imported to Wikimedia Commons.
Since this is true for quite a number of them, I would personally like to refrain from cluttering OSM with these external links.
Any Commons links still missing can be easily added later.

Regards,

Daniel

*Wikimedia Commons for reference

Thanks for clarifying :-)

Where exactly is it located? Couldn't find it on Mapillary yet. There may be a route marker to the east/right;
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=725609708993654&focus=photo

I understand your reaction. I'm sorry if it comes across as one.
I'm not too worried about it. It's unlikely they want to do map much harm. With new mappers it can be discussed eventually if needed. They are likely to get a welcome message from us and learn about this regardless. Corporate mappers should adjust to the organized editing guidelines, and it can take a bit before they cooperate. For more experienced mappers -not to be all personal about it-, it'd be good courtesy towards fellow mappers. It makes it easier to verify other mappers' changes and discuss their edits.
osm.wiki/Verifiability

I'm aware the changes you are doing are not changing much, they're more reverting incorrect changes. Still, it'd only be reasonable to use the local sources which the local community has agreed upon for best practice.

I hope this helps to clarify things.

This is a friendly notice for your own information. What you do with it is up to you. I do not intend to threaten any user with DWG action. However, if you make any inappropriate changes, it may result in such action.
Whether other people do this or not does not matter for this.

Please use proper sources in future edits. See also osm.wiki/Good_practice#Do_not_trace_from_outdated_imagery

You are using an outdated aerial imagery layer for this area. You should use the recommended aerial imagery layers which I mentioned above.

I haven't used JOSM in a long time. If you need any help with using these layers in JOSM, try asking on the forums.

Hey Spaghetti Monster,

Please use sources appropriate for the area you are mapping and specify them actively when saving your edits.

For The Netherlands, use Esri and PDOK 8cm aerial. These should be readily available in JOSM. You can find other data sources, like the AHN (LIDAR height model), on the forums:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393

If you need any help, comment on said thread, or start a new one.

Any inappropriate changes, being low accuracy or made using outdated sources, may be reverted by other mappers. If you continue to map inappropriately, the Data Working Group may have to step in. You are likely already aware of this.

Regards,

Daniel

At least one way created in this changeset has been removed, due to it not existing -at least on compatible aerial imagery-;
changeset/133557689
following user feedback from
note/3261130

See this wiki page to learn more
osm.wiki/Verifiability

-

(is: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8739140 )

Hey Anne,

way/1034576117
looks like a driveway on someone's private property, enclosed by walls, which happens to measure a car's length, and may not have a gate in front of it (one of many). I would suggest to remove it and add a way from the road, tagged as usual
highway=service
service=driveway

I personally do not use parking for individual houses outside exceptional cases where it looks like an open, standalone parking spot, located directly alongside the road, which may have a barrier (i.e. removable bollard), sign or marking indicating it is private/restricted. Or, where it is parking along a service road, say for an office/shop/... .

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Anne,

See way/161760101
Are you sure Penston's Garden derives its name from the River Breaghagh?

Regards,

Daniel

*correction: added two trees

Consider also moving the wheelchair tag to the POI node. This tag is more commonly associated with the POI. It is often missed by accident when moving POI information from a building to an address node and vice versa.

Could you message b-unicycling regarding this as well, please? Thanks in advance.

Ok. I'm exaggerating quite a bit since people tend to tag everything with a lifecycle prefix. Sorry.
I'll leave it as a seperate node for now and maybe it can be surveyed in the future if the building/rooms have any ref, eventhough they may not be signed anymore.

Source should be (use as reference only)
https://www.archaeology.ie/sites/default/files/media/publications/po19v1-all-counties.pdf