OpenStreetMap
danieldegroot2's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136748385 | Looks like some adjustments will be needed to the POI positions. Have you also taken new imagery? |
|
| 136666211 | The stream and side-stream have been re-aligned and extended in
|
|
| 136666211 | Hey Anne, This changeset has been reverted by
The bridge has been re-added in
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 135793912 | See also
|
|
| 135793912 | See also
|
|
| 136302027 | Note, you are using the national orthophoto -there's also a elevation model available-. There should be (almost) no offset. National orthophotos may've only become available in the editor recently. If you track the road south you will see the first part was last edited 2014 or 2019 with Bing, Esri (and some private gps trace which isn't quite verifiable):
I would suggest asking a moderator to revert it to its previous position. |
|
| 136308068 | Hey Casper, Ik stel voor covered=yes ipv covered=building_passage te gebruiken. Minder verwarrend (overdekt is ie toch).
Groet, Daniel |
|
| 136276178 | See also (used for reference only);
Additional links (not used) via
Also,
|
|
| 135561551 | Hey vaibhavnz, Thanks for the addition. Do try to verify your edits using available sources in the editor, please. (other aerial imagery and streetside imagery); in this case it seems to be visible on Bing Streetside. You should specify these sources when saving your edits.
I've added details and moved it in
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 135561551 | See also:
|
|
| 135793425 | ||
| 135573656 | Hey houtari, Yes, it does suggest this for buildings. However, it could become ambiguous which aspect is disused. Another mapper may think the museum is disused, as this is a non-physical tag, and change it to disused:tourism=museum .. as to avoid this it may be better to, as recommended otherwise, only add the lifecycle tag to the part which is no longer relevant - in this case, the milk churn stand.
Regardless, as data user, you should use both disused:*=* and disused=* in your queries, as both of these tags are in use to describe something being disused. There may still be outdated tagging, exceptions or accidental mistagging.
|
|
| 135554764 | See also
|
|
| 134470681 | ||
| 135445440 | See also (use for reference only!);
|
|
| 135429979 | Just try searching for a bit. Anyhow, could you please keep changeset comments related to the changeset? The rest can be discussed in DM. |
|
| 135429979 | See also Já 360° götusýn:
|
|
| 135278085 | See also this document for an image of the former milk churn stand;
|
|
| 133952557 | Hey Anne, There is good aerial and street level imagery available here; the latter clearly shows a low, triangular stand rather than a high, square one. As such, I've replaced the wikimedia link (2012!) with a Mapillary link. See
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 135064716 | Hey ftrebien, Please explicitly mention any sources you are using in the changeset source field when saving your changes. Sources like "more recent maps" and "various photos" are unclear and as such not verifiable.
Note, sources may or may not be compatible with the license OpenStreetMap is using; aka we may or may not be able to use the data in OpenStreetMap. See
As noted on the OSM Wiki, not all data sources listed there are known to be compatible.
- Data sources available in the (Rap)iD or JOSM editors by default in their imagery or data menu are allowed to be used for mapping in OSM.
Note, I can't give legal advice nor guarantee anything is ok to use. If you are unsure if you are using compatible sources, please contact the Licensing Working Group.
If you are using incompatible sources, please contact the Data Working Group to have it reverted.
This message is just for your information. I assume you are using compatible sources. I also invite you to check out the (global) contact channels if you haven't yet.
Regards, Daniel |