I think the woodchips are to soften your fall, if you fall out of the hammock, so I wouldn't call that outdoor seating. Or do you mean seating as in lying in a hammock?

The intended use was shop entrance, but this solution is fine with me, too.

Tut, tut, me. Fixed.

Because the name referred to the holy well and wasn't a subtownland name.

buildings adjusted

It's only roof:level=1, by the looks of it.

No, it was supposed to be "man_made=planter" as seen on Bing. I've corrected it now.

If I do these things when I'm sober, I shudder to think what would happen if I drank.

oops

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anta_(architecture)
i thought it was better than building:part=yes.

Sorry about that.

It was, fixed now.

I've split them, thanks.

The archaeological site is clearly visible on Esri Clarity and Bing and has an SMR number which means it's a recorded and protected monument.

I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM.

I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM.

I didn't find a single broken relation.

I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations, but I'll look into it.

I don't know why a new river relation should affect any boundary relations, but I'll look into it.

42 warnings ignored by the mapper - changeset reverted, because all the highways along this not signposted path are already mapped.