ref comments for cs changeset/83415156

go for it

Cogito, ergo sum - apparently you havn't given any thought about it.

Please have a look at the crosswalk. I changed and intregrated in route-relation "Skåneleden".

sorry addr:country=SE

Hej, looks good. Complete address on buildings with add:country=SE.

Autch, watch your argumentation! This argument could as well be applied to your own cs, changing from valid semicolon to comma. Housenumbers were correctly and validly tagged (multiples seperated by semicolon) before you changed. To cite from your latest comment "I don't think it is good if you change to what you prefer if both are accepted. "Just because you would like to tag in another way, doesn't mean you are right." (citation: tomasy)".
tomasy, you should really ponder on the sentence "Cogito, ergo sum"

Great, thanks!

Toppen, tack!

Dear tomasy, thanks for explaining (at last) and thank you for your devoted work with addresses! As you know - and as has been pointed out often - third-party applications (such as editor's auto-error-detection or as in this case OMS inspector) do not govern the choice of wich tags to use. As to your question in your latest comment (in fine); might the comment of the changeset give you a clue (just scroll up)?

Hej, skulle du kunna övertalas till att städa upp där? Där fanns några unconnected highways som jag fixade, men det hela ser inte bra ut med dublerade vägar. Tack!

Would you kindly make those buildings rectangular, thank you!

Men du, landuse=industrial finns ju på polygonen (relation/10990135)

I am still awaiting your answer to my question in what way does Openstreet Inspector "like" comma (,) as seperator för mulitple values better than semicolon (;)?
You brought up this argument yourself along with the statement that comma-seperation is more common (allthough wiki states that semicolon is standard and doesn't say anything about commas on how much more common).
In your latest comment - which did not answer my request for claification about OSM inspector - you supplement your originally two arguments by alluding that you have some sort of ownership of those cs or addresses because you have edited them before and that no-one else should dare to touch "your" edits. I must confess that I was not aware that this kind of exclusiveness existed in osm.
In order to answer your request for revert, I have to know all facts.
Hence: in what way does OSM inspector prefer comma-seperating above semicolon-seperating?

Yes I will revert the two last ones (from today).

Yes I will revert the two last ones (from today).

Tell me that this is not vandalism.

What's the purpuse of those "highways":

way/791763145

way/791763147

way/791763146

way/791763148

way/791763144

This is gross vandalism.

Source for this "highway" way/791763151?

I think this cs is pure vandalism.

Source for this "road" way/791761022

Where is this road in reallity? way/791760993