I don't think your changes to way/962492250 are correct, there's no marked lanes, if anything either turn shares the same space, so it's a bit like lanes=1, but I'm not sure it should be tagged.

turn:lanes, theres no marked turn lanes on this part, and you've got none:right coming for Forest Way to Russell Avenue?

"Authorised Vehicles Only" should be access=private, it allows deliveries and emergency services access.

access=no would mean no access by anyone, completely closed.

hi you have dragged the tree into the ocean node/13332744765/history

I can't find any signage or markings on the ground indicating way/470076706 is for bicycles, I would need to survey again though in case there is a sign at one of the entrances

It seems like these change continuously and you're endlessly updating the tags. If these values change so often do you need to have these updated in OSM?

I've fixed 1, 2 and 3. I've left 4 since I checked the historical 1982 imagery which shows it's possible there was once a driveway there, but still in general "not:" would be better when just trying to indicate this to other mappers.

4. way/1445927361/history "abandoned:" is best suited where there's evidence that it was once a driveway which is now no longer used. If you simply want to make it clear to future mappers that this is no a driveway since they might assume that from the lot boundaries, then best to use the "not:" prefix.

3. You've changed the geometry of the driveway, in a way that no longer matches the aerial imagery, you've moved it to run through trees and garages, apparently based on the Land Parcels alone.

2. I'm not sure how you can tell the surface=paved, at least for me looking at the imagery it's not clear and there's no street level imagery here. I think best to leave off the surface until it can be surveyed on the ground.

I see you added a new address for 11 Burrendong Pl at node/13286395669/history but it already exists at node/7066252214.

I don't believe we should duplicate it as that leads to ambiguity and it's best to place it at the residence. The routing engine can resolve which street it's accessed from based on the mapped driveway.

Do you think you can group similar changes together, doing one change per changeset makes reviewing much harder, takes longer to inspect changes, longer to sort through the changeset feed.

changeset/172435051 this, could you comment on that changeset with any further information?

but does it exist on the ground? In your previous edit you set access=private but now deleted?

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1424686327

if it's non-existent, fine to delete, but if it exists but not accessible then access=private is the way to go.

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

for next time, leave off the "kmh" if it's km/h, that's assumed by default.

you seem to be quiet on top of construction changes, could you check the change at changeset/172465660 ?

are you sure about that? It was only just changed to construction back in May and the new temporary onramp added way/1423785982/history.

Are you sure these are more recent changes than those made a years ago?

Also way/1106729756 connects to the tunnel, which is still marked as underconstruction so you've just opened the onramp leading into a dead-end once you reach the tunnel. I think you might be mistaken?

hi, all your changesets have now been reverted. You're changes appear to be vandalising the map. Please discuss anything you think was mapped correctly.

reverted

I've reverted and repaired this changeset.

I've reverted this change as it added a British power operator to a VIC power pole.