refering to way/1043256280/history

Usually the name only contains a "proper name" not something like "comming soon..." see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

If needed that can go into the description like you have, but usually shop=vacant is sufficient.

hi, you've listed your source as knowledge, but your prior "Courtesy and Emergency moorings" changesets appear to have systematically added data from another source. These appear to align with Maritime NSW data at https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset/2-maritime-nsw-public-mooring

Could you please clarify where the data you've been adding here was sourced from and your process?

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines document the steps which must be taken to perform an import

It's okay, mistakes happen, but glad we caught this early.

osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Victoria specifically lists each Vicmap dataset that is available, which doesn't include the aerials. Though based on this, I think we better add it to that list as red to make it clear it's not compatible.

If we were able to use Vicmap Aerials, then we would have made them available by default in iD, JOSM, Vespucci.

was adding a street name to the residential area at way/1206858534/history intentional? looks wrong to me.

Didn't realise there was a track there, thanks.

Thanks for the contribution!

It looks like you've accidentally dragged a bus stop https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/12644854029 it's too easy to accidentally drag nodes in the iD editor.. I've fixed that.

I updated the tags for node/13461688921/history and in doing so I changed the operator:type

I just improved some of the geometries from Esri World Imagery and Mapbox imagery which shows the changes.

I'll add a note.

though I can't see it on https://www.casimaging.com.au/our-locations/ so perhaps they closed down or are a different brand now?

I moved `place=neighbourhood` + `name=Darling Square` to a new way way/1470170829 since the name is for the whole precinct, not just the plaza/pedestrian area.

I've reverted this changeset in changeset/177120254

There have been significant changes on the ground here, which I'd previously traced to align with these changes based on ODM imagery, but this changeset reverted a bunch of those changes to make the data match the outdated DCS NSW imagery.

wouldn't wheelchair=yes be needed to indicate that for this railway stop position you can board/alight in a wheelchair?

node/10294488709 would be better as healthcare=medical_imaging

I think healthcare=medical_imaging from osm.wiki/Proposal:Medical_Imaging would be a better fit for node/13164289072

I think healthcare=medical_imaging from osm.wiki/Proposal:Medical_Imaging would be a better fit for node/10250283804

I think I think healthcare=medical_imaging from osm.wiki/Proposal:Medical_Imaging would be a better fit for node/10856069485

I think healthcare=medical_imaging from osm.wiki/Proposal:Medical_Imaging would be a better fit for node/12077904909

in case you didn't see, the discussion is at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-locality-name-gabba-hill-useful/140437

I think `loc_name=*` is acceptable to indicate that the name is more of a locally used name only, but I agree with removing official_name since that only applies to the suburb.

I'll mention on the thread above.