probably used to be more distinguished as a point before they reclaimed all the parklands here

Thanks! I added some of the construction areas from my imagery, and will try to keep it updated too.

looks good! did you do those connectivity relations by hand? I saw there was a branch of iD or Rapid that had a UI for it, but yet to experiment with it.

These changes look problematic for example you've taking a node node/1886265360/history with 14 year history of changes and replace it with your own brand new node node/14027610507

The history should be retained.

Also for some of the other stations that you've converted to an area, the JOSM replace geometry tool should have been used so that the node is placed on the way to retain some level of history...

Would you prefer to fix this or should we revert the changeset then try and apply some of the fixes again?

hi we generally prefer to not map suburb, state, postcode as these are inherited from existing mapped boundaries.

Per note/4886298 part of this was changed back to footpath only, given no indication of it being a shared path on the ground.

access=no means nobody can access it, did you mean access=private that only those like the owner and those with permission can use it? That said it looks like this is a public road, but if gates have been built or signage indicates it cannot be used then access=private could apply.

Those charts are copyright Airservices Australia and aren't under an open license compatible with OpenStreetMap. Unless you have information to suggest otherwise, we'll need to revert these changesets. Please refrain from further edits using incompatible sources.

No reply I've removed the public transport tags from node/11092810121

I had `roundtrip=yes` since the route is a roundtrip, there and back, is that not sufficient?

When I created this relation, I didn't include the network tags as I didn't see it as part of the Transport for NSW network, those tags were added by you in changeset/169695906 with the justification "make networks match" which seems a bit suspisios to me, like you're just selecting all bus routes and without any review assuming they are TfNSW routes?

See the history https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/16164859

Based on this, unless you have more context behind the changes or more information, I'll revert this back to my original surveyed state.

node/6926116721/history is inside the school?

Are you sure these are all public transport stops? For example node/11092810121/history as I surveyed it likely wouldn't count as a public transport platform, but it is a bus stop, since it operates more like a shuttle than a public transport route.

What is your source/basis for marking this disused? https://www.sydneybusmuseum.com/open-days still says the route runs.

https://www.sydneybusmuseum.com/open-days still says it runs...

You need to add access=private to private features like node/13989264242/history otherwise they'll show up as public playgrounds.

Though I would argue that personal trampolines that are movable and not permanently fixed shouldn't be mapped.

If it's part of the middle school campus of Cammeraygal High, it should be combined into a multipolygon.

In the iD editor, you can Shift + select both ways, then right click Merge.

hi way/1469131821/history was changed to amenity=school, without any details.

Were the tennis courts demolished? A new school built, or is this part of Cammeraygal High?

nice find. we can update the pipeline route. It also seems that the junction is at Tunks Park, so the section from Wollstonecraft to Brightmore Reserve likely routes via Tunks Park.

I've updated the name of node/46500819/history to reflect the current modern signage there.