hi this is the footpath not a bridge, therefore I've reverted this change.

way/758025663 is not representing the lot boundary, it's representing the trees, the south east corner looks like grass only so shouldn't be included unless it's been reforested.

I've restored the address node node/12411966515 which was deleted in this changeset.

I've restored the address node node/12411966515 which was dragged to the wrong location in this changeset.

I've restored the address node node/12419092614 which was deleted here

Yeah I think it's not right to add this to watercourses outside of a golf course.

I've reverted this change since added layer=-1 to seemingly ground level buildings which seemingly was done to silence editor warnings.

I've reverted this change since it removed the building type.

sorry I didn't see your change here, I just reverted the problematic change.

I've reverted this change since it deleted all the tags per each semi, and regardless it's better to have each semi mapped individually.

changeset/173857036

layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

changeset/173856994

from the imagery this building does appear to exist so I've reverted this deletion, though it needs a survey to confirm.

in the processed deleting the building to replace it with individual buildings you've lost some tags like building=retail and building:levels, where possible these should be retained.

layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

changeset/173856773

layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

changeset/173856773

layer=1 implies one building is over the other, but that's unlikely here they are both likely at ground level.

Edgeroi is already mapped at relation/5793377 as a place=hamlet. I've reverted this change since it created a duplicate place for Edgeroi.

unit 3 is already mapped at node/12416900561 and this address is already mapped as addr:unit=1.

I've reverted this change.

you can add multiple buildings in one changeset, then save at the end rather than creating a changeset for each building.

Thanks for fixing it, sorry from the outside it looked like apartments but I didn't check any signs or entrances.