aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173886095 | ||
| 173886095 | The high voltage tower is already mapped at node/1832732134
|
|
| 173443366 | truck isn't a commonly used access key per access=*#Land-based_transportation hgv=* is likely the best tag for "trucks" signage. |
|
| 173472409 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway. |
|
| 173472648 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway |
|
| 173473008 | I've updated the tags to driveway. |
|
| 173473092 | I've updated the tags to driveway and disconnected the road from the power line. |
|
| 173473116 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway |
|
| 173473353 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway |
|
| 173473421 | Per street level imagery this don't connect to Marroondah Highway so I've disconnected it. I've also changed the tags to shared driveway. |
|
| 173473709 | I've updated the tags to a driveway. |
|
| 173474004 | I've updated these to a shared driveway. |
|
| 173474708 | Based ,on your reported imagery used I can't see any evidence that this road connects through, so I've split the way and updated the tags to driveway. |
|
| 173476014 | I've updated the tags to be a driveway |
|
| 173476128 | I've updated the tag here to mark it as a driveway. |
|
| 173477259 | I've updated the tags on these to be Shared Driveways |
|
| 173563166 | I think to meet cyclestreet=* it must be a road that is signposted/marked to be explicitly for bicycles as the primary road users with motor vehicles as secondary users. |
|
| 173568549 | the tag nudism=yes already implies this so no need for a note |
|
| 173656081 | to be honest this looks more urban than rural, given the small block size, dense housing and the road network layout... |
|
| 173695831 | thanks for merging the address nodes with your new building outlines correctly. |