Dakujem za odpovede.
1. Prave aby dve budovy nemali rovnake adresy a aj v katastri je to len jedna budova, tak by to v OSM nemli byt budovy dve, aby sa nam to dobre kontrolovalo (napr. porovnavame a synchronizujeme adresy s registrom adries). Pokial je budova vovnutri rozdelena na dve casti (alebo aj zvonku vidiet 2 stavebne odlisne casti), tak na to sa pouziva znacka building:part. Urobil som Vam to, mozete pozriet.

2. arealy skolky a skoly sa este doteraz prekryvali, opravil som.

3.dobre, ked ma skola dve budovy.

4.ok

5.ak je to takto potom ste to oznacili spravne.

6.Ak je tam zavora, treba pozriet dopravne znacky, alebo aky je zamer zavory. To, ze sa da ju fyzicky obist este neznamena, ze je to oficialne povolene. Prosim pozriet tu zavoru, lebo momentalne je znacena divne. Smu tam prejst motorove vozidla vlastnikov, chodci, bicykle a kone (co sa mi nepaci). Okrem toho nic. Ziadni kolobezkari, korculiari, skateboardy, ci ine nemotorove vozidla. Nezda sa mi to uplne spravne. Mozno vlastnici (private) by mohli prejst aj na korculiach. Alebo aj vsetci.

I fixed this.

Odlisil som teda firmu (ako areal) od budovy a teda mozu mat odlisne adresy, ked si to firma tak nezmyselne chce pisat (lebo na tomto mieste vychadza Malogutorska 7 podla postupnosti okolitych supisnych cisel, cislo 277 by bolo asi niekde v poli, vzdialene kilometre).

Zdravim, hodnota 'permit' znamena, ze je verejne pristupne, len si treba vybavit povolenie (ale dostane ho kazdy).

Also, regardless of how some brands are written in their official documents, or the iD editor database, the shops are written differently on the ground, with different letter case. E.g. TABAK PRESS, Sofia, VEAN tattoo. So please do not change the names, if you haven't seen the shops in reality.

Thanks for adding the whole Slovenska akademia vied campus as amenity=research_institute.

I have corrected some errors in the 3D shapes of the buildings (overlapping parts).
I am not sure if building way/69235599 has 2 levels or 1 as there is no part that has 2 levels tagged.

Yes, I agree there should be some entrance=main object that indicates where to enter the campus. I just dispute why it is on a node on the guardhouse where people normally do not go. I think it should be on node/13771801471 and the gate on the other side of the road too (if both can be used equally to enter the campus).

Thanks. I think having a multipolygon of an institute and having it 2 buildings as members, is also fine. An area encompasing those buildings is fine too.

I am more concerned with cases where you merged buildings into one, which aren't one building (have different addresses), e.g. way/267375403 . You should have consulted the Slovak cadastre map.

Other than that, the additions look good (except the main entrances as pointed out in other changeset), I will check if the 3D building parts are correct. Thanks for updating the campus.

Hi, what is the entrance at node/13780731014 good for? It can be bypassed via the other footway (not connected to the entrance) so it probably isn't the main entrance to the SAV campus. Is it the main entrance to the guardhouse (Vratnica) ? Why is that interesting?
I guess the main entrance is at the gate through the fence.

Ok then, so just quote the source in the changeset next time (source=survey).

Hi, what is the source of this data? You cannot see refs of railway switches on the ground.

At way/206978360 landuse=recreation_ground was still better than your changed 'residential'. Anyway, I would suggest leisure=resort instead. You added tourism=hotel, which is good too.

Ano, dakujem.
Len tie way/1502906902 a na druhje strane, ak ide o drzadlo na schodoch, tak to nie je zabradlie, ale handrail:center=yes ako vlastnost tych schodov.

Hi, I don't think all the huts need tourism=apartment tags as they belong to the main 5-star hotel already tagged on the whole area. The hotel is a higher standard accomodation than tourism=apartment. Or do you really want to say that these huts can be booked as apartments, without catering or any other hotel services?

Hi, what is the reason for changing the road classification?
It seems there is a schema for this road 11 in changeset changeset/113255131 where all these interconnecting roads are trunk_link and you randomly change one of them to primary? What is the reason and your concept for mapping this road 11 along its length?

Hi, these are fake paving stones on the footways. It is just painted concrete with some relief decoration.

Hi, It is not always visible from aerial imagery which building is built as a hotel, thus deserves the tag building=hotel.
Second, you write building=hotel (the form of the building), but actually added tourism=hotel (the current use/function of the object). That is strange. Also, most of the hotels were already mapped using a node. So you just added duplicates.

Zdravim, ta Vycvikova skola stale existuje a je funckna. Tak neviem preco ste to zrusili.

Myslim, ze pridavat local_ref na objektoch stop_position je dost zbytocne, ked uz to mame na objektoch public_transport=platform (dufam, ze kde to chybalo ste hodnotu pridali na oba). Ale hlavne to nepatri do nazvu, dakujem, ze ste to v dalsej sade zmien opravili:)

Elektricka aj autobus tu maju spolocnu zastavku, takze len jedno local_ref (pre kazdu stranu).

Please look carefully what you are changing. This stop already exists, and this way is just a duplicate.