Zdravim, tato zmena nevyzera dobre. Preco vymazavate highway=traffic_signals? Bolo to spravne, auta tam maju semafor. Aj chodci (crossing=traffic_signals).
A zmena crossing_ref=zebra na crossing:markings=zebra to je kozmeticka uprava, ktora nic neriesi a nie je v zadani Maproulette.

Zdravim, 32metrov na strome node/5341623192 a jeho susedovi sa mi zda privela.

A preco napr. na Slalomke menite route=mtb na route=bicycle?
Bol som tam, a na strome od Cerveneho kriza je na strome zlte C, ale ziadne smerovniky o trase 8042 tam nie su. Ako som pisal, Slalomka nezacina na Cervenom krizi ale az dalej v lese. Mozno treba trasy mtb a bicycle rozlisit, ako ste to urobili inde (ale nezda sa mi, ze by sa mali prekryvat).

A to akoze po tych mtb trailoch akohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20398863 mozu jazdit aj normalne bicykle a ma to oficialne cislo? A naozaj ma 8027 2 alternativne trasy? No poslite mi zdroj k tomuto, dakujem.

Preco by na mtb traily mali mat pristup chodci? Podla znaciek na mieste su tam chodci zakazani.

Aj ked zprovozneny, ale nie pre vsetky formy dopravy. mtb=designated tam uz bolo, takze nebola potrebna ziadna zmena.

Zdravim, to ake podklady Vam dal SCK, ze ste mohli upravit napr. way/641368721 a jemne poposuvat body? Hlavne ked tuto mtb trasu nespravuje SCK. Skoda, ze Vam nedali aj informaciu o tom, kde v skutocnosti napr. trail Slalomka zacina, kedze v OSM to mame zle (aspon podla tabul na mieste).

Hi, why would you want routing over trails designated for mountain bikes only? What kind of vehicle do you want to route there? The trails are really signposted for mtb only, not accessible to e.g. pedestrians. This change seems wrong as a whole.

Preco "Unicredit Bank" na "Unicredit"? Kde sme si toto dohodli?
Banka ma oficialne velmi dlhy nazov, tak ak ideme pisat skratky, treba si ich dohodnut.

The wiki boundary=administrative does not mention 'name' on the boundary ways (relation members). But I agree it was a good help to have those country borders labeled.

The change on way/1160239565 seems OK, the angle could even be 90deg (perpendicular to the main road Kostiviarska.

But then change on way/33576380 does not make sense. Now when you go from this part of Jelsova to the northern part (across Kostiviarska), you want to get navigation guidance of turn left, then turn right? Even though you can just drive straight?
What routing could have been wrong here? Notice routing is different to turn-by-turn navigation guidance.
Or did you not get 'turn left' prompts when going from Kostiviarska to Jelsova? That would be a navigation bug, not to be solved by change in the map.

On the other hand, if you draw the centerline of the Jelsova street, then the geometry after your change is correct. I just dispute explaining the changes by navigation.

Thanks. But if you change a building like way/127495584 , then also update the source tag. It is no longer kapor2, if you changed it according to Ortofotomozaika SR.

Also please do not randomly move buildings like way/127495407 by a few centimeters. Buildings with source=kapor2 (or ZBGIS) are from Slovak cadastre map and are usually correct and more precise than aerial imagery. So only touch them if you clearly see in aerial, that the building is totally wrong. Or you can cross-check with the cadastre that the building has changed. You cannot see displacement by small distances on Ortofotomozaika that is lower resolution. In this case both Ortofotomozaika and cadastre shows that that small building should now be much longer to the west. So when you wanted to touch that building, you could at least improve it in this way.

This looks good, thanks.

Why are you applying tags suggested to you without understanding them?

This change does not seem correct in any way. changing turn lanes from 'left' to 'through' ? Again separating roads too early?
You do not need to draw every piece of road to a centimeter precision. Such a juntion can be mapped simpler as a single point where all the roads meet on the Innviertler Strasse and the segment way/102408507 doesn't even need to exist.

You must not optimize data for some particular router. You tag what is correct, not what a particular app likes. None of the routers on osm.org (like Valhalla) are particularly good so if they produce something wrong, it is not really relevant.
On this road, you made dubious changes: if there is only one lane, how can there be lane markings? And if there is only one lane, how can it be marked merge_to_right ? There is no other lane on the right to merge to.

Hi, what is the source of the maxspeed? You only claim to use basemap.at Orthofoto, where you of course canot see maxspeed signs. If you used it because there is maxspeed=60 on the B137 road, then that is dubious, as you are not on that road yet. Unless this road is again separated wrongly and is actually just a merge lane of B137.

If it connects 2 tertiary roads, then it indeed may be a link. Now you created a fictional tertiary road without official number. Anyway, the roads in the south are tertiary just because someone changed them like that, they also aren't official. In that case this can be tertiary too.

Hi, why is this road 'tertiary' ?

Zdravim, manipulujete udaje pre "spravny vypocet trasy" v nejakej konkretnej navigacii? To nie je spravny postup.