Cize vlastne podla popisu medzi footway a pedestrian nie je ziadny rozdiel. Z tejto citacie nemozete tvrdit, ze toto je jasne pedestrian.

Podla mna na pesiu zonu niekedy mozu aj vozidla, ktore su tam povolene (co je aj na wiki). Na chodnik vacsinou nie. Toto uzemie by to mohlo splnat, ale Vy ziadny taky dovod neuvadzate.

Akoby sa pocet schodov nedal definovat? Pretoze sa plynule stracaju a pocet schodov sa zmensuje? Ale na konkretnom mieste kde boli schody zakreslene, urcite je aj konkretny pocet schodov.

Ano pozrel som sa a cakam kedy to poopravujete. Lebo sucasny stav je uplny blud.

Rozumiem, v principe mate pravdu.
Tu vsak o zaciatocnika nejde, vzdy ked narazim na jeho zmenu, tak je to tragedia, na nic nereaguje a na fore klame. Takze tiez nemam dovod byt velmi diplomaticky.

Aj ini to uz po Vas museli opravovat: changeset/173274760 .

Ako obycajne ziadny zdroj.
Podla novin je to naopak, zo Zabotovej sa moze zabocit len dolava, uz nie doprava.
https://www.bratislavskenoviny.sk/aktuality/stare-mesto/87870-pripominame-hlavne-mesto-meni-organizaciu-dopravy-na-zabotovej-a-karpatskej
Ak teda na mieste nedali znacky opacne, spravim to v OSM podla clanku.

A na tej Karpatskej ste tiez nic nedosiahli, relacia obmedzenia zabocenia s jednym clenom (dokonca bez roli) je neplatna.

To iste zo Zabotovej, relacia nefunkcna. Tam ani ziadna nemusela byt, ked ste chceli len doprava.

Ak neviete robit tieto relacie tak sa to naucte, alebo ich nerobte, lebo nahodou vyrobite nezmyselny zakaz, ktory bude vodicom skodit.

I don't know. If you quoted a source we could have checked.

Changing buildings into underground parkings? There clearly is a building part between the 4 apartment houses of Bory na Hradzi A*, so why removing it. If there is a parking that can be modelled too. But do not remove valid buildings. You can check even the cadarste considers all that as one building.

I really doubt the new footways are only 1 meter wide.

Thanks for adding new parkings here. But you did not need to damage parkings already drawn precisely from cadastre map (marked with source=ZBGIS) and move them to wrong imprecise locations based on ESRI.

Hi, what do you try to express with the tag access=permit? Are you sure anyone can get the permit to park here?

Also please do not make changes in such a large area across multiple countries.

Hi, why are you removing the int_ref tags? You provide no description and no source. Such a change is very dubious.

3 bodky? Zrejme teda bezcenna zmena aj pre Vas.

Just stacking bad changes on other bad changes without solving anything. Probably tagging for routers that do not understand "change" tags.

The triple branching at wrong location was actually caused by wrong change at changeset/172143108 .

All of this will be reverted.

Wrong change again, unneded branching of roads and even invalid values of turn:lanes at way/1431091476 so navigation will be wrong after this change, not before it.

This change is absolutely wrong and will be reverted. Don't ever damage roads in this way. See lanes=*#Examples and further examples.

A dalsie nezmyselne zmeny.
Ten kruhac pri Avione je jasny revert. Uplne vymyslene cesty co ste tu urobili.

Hi, please put proper descriptions on your changesets, see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Not just "updated tags".

Although in this case it is actually the full description of what you have done here. Just blindly clicking "update tags" in the iD editor without knowing what you are doing. Thus losing correct names of pharmacies, changing CSOB,Wustenrot,Kooperativa wikidata to wrong one (Czech vs. Slovak branch), changing Z-Box parcel_locker brand to the one of its operator (which is even more weird because iD should know the brand=Z-Box as seen in https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=*&k=amenity&v=parcel_locker#zbox-e15ec5 , so it should not have proposed such a change). On atms the brand should not contain the bank operating it, that is in the operator tag.
Useless node at node/13521889459 ?

So please no more of such mechanical changes, before you understand what they do and whether the new values are actually correct.

iD is known for wrong suggestions and you as a beginner should not blindly let it do changes you do not understand.

Thanks.

Zdravim, preco davate znacky traffic_signals:* na cestu a nie na semafor? Ano da sa aj na obe ak velmi chcete, ale primarne nech su na bode semaforu. A hlavne nech si neodporuju, ako napriklad:
way/1495880245
a
node/13137563874

Take ani nie je. Potom access=private, cize len komu da vlastnik suhlas. Neda kazdemu okoloiducemu, len zakaznikom a len niektorym. Ale ti maju aj velke parkovisko pred budovou.