Zdravim, vacsina usekov cyklopruhov po Hlavnej ulici nie je nejako fyzicky oddelena od pruhov pre auta, takze nebolo potrebne ich znacit ako samostatne cesty.

Why are roads like way/1030542227 and way/156345618 unclassified?

You also added some traffic signals for cars like node/12544098823, but left crossing as uncontrolled (no signal) for pedestrians across the same roads (even when there are fixme tags asking when the signals get enabled.
This is quite conflicting.

You also added a give_way sign at node/12174233665 while there is also a traffic signal built. Is that one not enabled, even though the others are?

Hi, you did some fine work here, this roundabout needed some improvement as it is newly built. There is also an OSM note about it in the middle of the roundabout. Also thanks for not damaging the bus routes passing the roundabout.

However, why do you think this is how this kind of roundabout is mapped? Is there any agreement for this? As usually you do not draw each traffic lane as separate OSM way. I understand they lead to different exits and have different turn possibilities, but that can also be expressed differently.

And why did you change the part of Slovnaftska street around way/610692908 as unclassified?

Dakujeme, ale prosim neposuvajte body kde sa cesty rozvetvuju na nespravne pozicie (napr. node/8485807419 ). Oddelenie ma byt az kde je nemozne odbocit, je tam fyzicka zabrana alebo uz uplne rozdelene cesty srafovanim. Nie len obycajna plna ciara. Pozrite osm.wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations .

Tiez uvadzajte zdroj udajov, lebo pridavate velmi specificke udaje ako railway=owner_change, ktore zrejme ani nie su vidiet na mieste.

Zdravim, nepridavajte railway=crossing na miesta, kde je prechod zakazany (napr. zakonom) a este je to aj v OSM zapisane, napr. node/1717939944 .

Aj napriklad way/75219850 nie je building=garage podla definicie v OSM, mozno tak building=garages. Chapem, ze to mozno register nerozlisuje. Ale bude treba s tym nejako nalozit a nie to teda naslepo importovat do OSM, tak ako mnohe ine typy budov, co sme uz identifikovali ako problemove.

Sadly, all the changes are wrong here. The touched public transport stops are served by trolleybuses, not buses. And the English name of the Retia medical centre is just made up by you. Or what is the source?

Preco ste odobrali aj bicycle=no, ked pisete o bicycle=yes ?

What is the point of this change? Just adding postcodes on random shops? We already have postcodes on addresses in the building and also whole postcode boundaries in the city.

These changes are unneded.

Please do not add a standalone addr:postcode on random shops, there are better addresses nearby.

And finally stop with the bogus changeset description of "The triangle is not valid" !

Hi, please don't add duplicate and incomplete addresses like node/12230507547. Also do not put outdoor_seating=no on objects like building where they do not make much sense.
The building does have 18 levels (you count the ground floor too in OSM into building:levels).
The position of the parkings at LIGET and parking roof are very imprecise. I am not sure which Ortofotomozaika you used, because the old one (2020) does not show the building yet, the new one (2023) would show you you have placed the objects wrongly. So that is weird. I will fix it, but please improve your process.

The grass areas at Topolcianska look right, but there is no real wild grassland in this area, it is all managed grass. See the description at natural=grassland .
Also you should have connected the big grass area to the adjoining water polygon of Chorvátske rameno, as there is no gap between them (grass touches the water).

Taktiez prosim nekreslit naslepo podla LIDARu (ak ste nesnimali tento mesiac), lebo moze byt zastaraly. Napr. cesta way/938447468 je na snikmach ESRI zasypana nejakym materialom, takze nie je priechodna. Samozrejme ak ste tam boli teraz v januari a material tam uz nie je, potom je to v poriadku.

Zdravim, prosim nerobte zmeny na takom velkom uzemi v jednej sade zmien.

Dakujem za pridanie novych lesnych chodnickov pri Dunaji.

Pozor ale na duplicity, napr. cesta way/1349024940 uz existovala ako way/62364182, stacilo ju upresnit. Alebo su tam naozaj dve prekryvajuce sa cesticky?

Tiez nemyslim, ze tie lesne cesticky je potrebne kreslit tak dokonalo so stovkami bodov.

A Vy mate vlastny LIDAR? Ak nie, a pouzivate nejaky zdroj, treba uviest jeho nazov, aby sa tie zmeny dali overit.
Dakujem

Hi, why don't you specify what markings are at the crossings? Just a 'yes' value does not add much information.

Zdravim, ako som uz pisal, menej tych reklam.

A nepresuvajte spravne umiestnene podniky na nezmyselne vymyslene pozicie, ako napr. tu na chodnik pred budovou.

Otazka je, ci to vie rozlisit podla krajiny. Zda sa, ze ano, skusim to nahlasit.

No ale preco odklikavate chybne navrhy od iD, ked na fotke ste videli spravny napis?

Skor tam bude meno doktora.
Slovaci tam ist nemozu?

Zdravim, to je naozaj takyto oficialny nazov? Nezda sa mi to.

Teda pri tom kruhovom objazde chapem co ste chceli dosiahnut, ale treba to urobit inak.
Priechody pre chodcov OK, to obnovim.
Ale zmena krizovatky 517 s najazdom na D1 uplne zbytocna a chybna.