Hi, why does the entrance road to the bus station need to be mapped as 3 separated roads? There does not seem to be any separation between them visible on Ortofotomozaika imagery. Is there some new construction in reality? Also, by separating the roads, you forgot to relocate the bus lines arriving into the station. Will you fix it?

Hi, what is the legacy=1 tag? It does not seem to have any wiki description. Also, you need to mention your real sources of the changes, I guess you cannot see such relation properties from aerial imagery.

Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie vysok budov, ale nepisu sa do znaciek maxheight, ani maxweight, ale len 'height'.
Taktiez uvadzajte skutocne zdroje, lebo neviem ci z fotiek Bing tie vysky viete zistit.

Jasne, dakujem.

Rozumiem, testovali ste to az ked nastal ten datum, tak ako ja. Cize vyzera, ze to tiez zvladaju, aspon taketo jednoduche podmienky.

Ale v nich viete zadat datum jazdy v buducnosti?

Skusal som dnes (22.12.) v OsmAnd s datami z 20.12.2025 a uz naviguje cez tunel, dovcera obchazkou.

Tunel vraj maju dnes otvorit, takze po otestovani mozete zmenit data v OSM. Zrejme odobrat obe access* znacky.

Sorry, I don't have local knowledge of this area, I just looked at the imagery. Please fix it from your sources. Thanks

Super, to je pekne, ze sa tam da zadat aj datum jazdy.
OsmAnd to tiez podporuje, odskusam to teda po 21.12, ci zvlada aj tuto invertovanu verziu znaciek.

Ano ten bod som opravil, dakujem za posun aj tej dalsej pripajajucej sa cesty.

Cesty by sa mali spojit do jednej kde konci fyzicka zabrana a srafovanie. Plna ciara uz nie, tam staci jedna OSM cesta pre oba smery.

Hi, there is parking tagged on way/115842928, why does it also need to be on the building covering it (with solar panels)? Is there another parking on top of the building?

Cyklotrasa popri VUB nie je fyzicky oddelena od chodnika, je to podla dopravnej znacky chodnik pre pesich aj cyklistov len je segregovany (ciarou na ceste). takze staci znacka segregegated=yes a bicycle=designated a foot=designated na jednej OSM ceste.

Ak sa jemne zmenil tvar krizovatky Dunajska/Mlynske Nivy a tie ostrovceky, tak to uvidime ked budu na leteckych snimkach. Dovtedy su to len odhady od oka a kozmeticke zmeny ;) Ak aj zostane povodny stav, ale aspon tam nebudu routovacie problemy, ktore ste sposobili.

Ked si vsimnete v Bratislave to hromadne zmenil jediny autor a este sme nemali tu chut to po nom vratit naspat. Ale dostaneme sa k tomu, kedze adresy generujeme aj automaticky z registra adries (bez medzier).
Diskutuje sa to opakovane na fore, napr. https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/jRf1VQWLDnc/m/E48cxyAPAgAJ .

The Hungarian name of maly Dunaj is already tagged on the whole river relation at relation/5535899 . No need to add it to parts of the river.

Hi, how did youi find out the number of road 130? There is no Mapillary street level imagery along this road. So what imagery did you use? Also, the Slovak road database does not have a road 130, it is still marked as 1049. Also road 130 would be sencodary, not tertiary.
So this change is very questionable and you need to explain why it would be correct.

way/51874700 adding building=hotel only specifies how the building looks like, or how it is constructed. It does not say it is used as a hotel. For that you need tourism=hotel.

You have totally destroyed the building of Tempo shop in Zlate klasy way/51874970 . The original building was correct. Do NOT use the Bing imagery, it is outdated and unclear. Use Ortofotomozaika SR and Slovak cadastre map. Then you would see the building was correct.
Also moving the hotel Mager was incorrect.
Fuel station buildings like way/777829068 were also moved wrongly. It seems someone else has already fixed those.

Also do not add fictional addr:* components (like addr:street on the Tempo shop) when the building does not have a streetnumber (only conscription number). We import addresses from official state register and follow its definitions of addresses for all buildings.

The building way/51875156 can be seen on your Bing imagery, why did you remove it?

I have fixed the problems (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175690419 ), but pay more attention next time.

Thank you for the other changes that look good.

Hi, on swing gate node/12944830848 what do you mean with motor_vehicle=designated? It means that the object is especially designated for all motor_vehicles to use (so not a restriction, actually a recommendation to use). Is that what you really meant? Isn't the gate actually restricting motor vehicles to private access?

2)Ano, moze sa tadial snazit navigovat. Ale to moze aj cez parkovaciu ulicku, aj ked teda s mensou pravdepodobnostou. Ale zase si nemozeme vymyslat data, ktore niesu len kvoli navigacii. Riesenim je doplnit tam existujuce znacky Stop na oboch stranach cesty.
3) chapem, ze vyzera tak horsie, ako by sa tam nemalo jazdit. Ale nie je tam ziadna dopravna znacka. A teraz ste tam pridali parkovisko. Ale oznacenim access=permissive ste nevyjadrili ani jednu z tychto moznosti a navigacia tam bude veselo navigovat, hlavne ked tym teraz obide jednu znacku stop (smerom na juh).
A na tom parkovisku access=permit asi tiez nebude dobre. Kde sa da ziskat to povolenie?

Zdravim, preco je bazen turistickou atrakciou? A hlavne ked je pristupny iba zakaznikom hotela?

Zdravim, preco posun bodu node/205261324 o taky kus na vychod? Javi sa mi, ze sa cesty zbiehaju skor a povodna poloha bola lepsia.

Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenie. Pozor ale na spravne znacenie.
Cesta way/1265690218 ma len zakaz vjazdu, nie zakaz vstupu aj chodcom. Takze vehicle=no.

Cesta way/331295702 cez pumpu nie je ziadna parkovacia ulicka, takze nie parking_aisle. Ma byt bez driveway=*.

Na ceste way/473808211 je aka dopravna znacka, ktoru ste chceli vyjadrit pomocou access=permissive (cize pristup pre vsetkych kym si to vlastnik nerozmysli)? To by aj mohlo sediet, len neviem ci to ste naozaj mali na mysli.