Changeset When Comment
131784711

Hello kechan_tagfix,
Here you've changed "building=building" to "building=yes". Now while "building=yes" is undoubtably more common than building=building, it conveys no extra information, so your edit is of no value here.
Also, it's clear from the imagery here that the northern building is rectangular but wasn't mapped accurately on the corners. If you had have squared the building, that would have been of benefit.
Also please use a better changesent comment than simply "fix building tag". Explain what you did, why you did it and what the source was.

131300925

The OSM wiki is supposed to describe how people map things, not tell them how to map.
The wiki page that you refer to explicitly says:
"building=offices
If you know places with this tag, verify if it could be tagged with another tag.
Automated edits are strongly discouraged unless you really know what you are doing!"

Are you saying here that you took no steps whatsoever to verify your change before reading (and it seems not understanding) a wiki page?

131779448

@Allison P
Thankfully, quite a lot of those changesets were completely blank.

131855229

This was saved by accident. It's part of the next changeset "Filled in gap in NCN6_R 12461".

131837064

Привет,
Ваш набор изменений ("город называется Степанакерт, а не Ханкенди") выглядит как чисто политическая правка.

Это также выглядит неправильно, поскольку name:pl и alt_name:pl были изменены на одно и то же значение, что не имеет смысла:

https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036

Вполне возможно, что город может называться ОБА Степанакертом и Ханкенди, разными людьми. Если у вас есть основания полагать, что эти имена не соответствуют использованию языка, пожалуйста, обсудите это с более широким сообществом OSM.
Учитывая международный характер конфликта здесь, я бы предложил основной список рассылки «обсуждение» или community.openstreetmap.org.
С уважением,
Энди Таунсенд, от имени Рабочей группы по данным OSM.

131837064

Hello,
Your changeset here ("the city is called Stepanakert not Khankendi") looks like a purely political edit.

It also looks wrong in that the name:pl and alt_name:pl were changed to the same value, which makes no sense:

https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036

It is perfectly possible for the city to be called BOTH Stepanakert and Khankendi, by different people. If you have reason to believe that those names don't follow language usage, then please discuss with the wider OSM community.
Given the international nature of the conflict here, I'd suggest the main "talk" mailing list or community.openstreetmap.org
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

131750948

@SherbetS Thanks.

131715318

Alas, it seems that you have ignored the problems that you caused previously:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12163682

131715318

Hello,
This looks very much like a mechanical edit. I haven't seen any discussion with the local community. If you you did that, can you explain where? If not, it may need to be reverted.
Best Regards,
Andy

115447422

@marczoutendijk well, it depends on the context of course. If a mapper has been tagging highways as paved or unpaved, then an occasional unpaved3 is likely a typo. If they're just entering out of context tag keys and values, no so much.

131708323

Merhaba,
Wikipedia'nın lisansı uyumlu olmadığı için OpenStreetMap için geçerli bir kaynak OLMADIĞINI lütfen unutmayın.
Yine de wikipedia'yı güncellemek için kullanılan kaynağı kullanabilirsiniz - lütfen oradaki lisansları kontrol edin.
Saygılarımla,
Andy

131708323

Hello,
Please be aware that wikipedia is NOT a valid source for OpenStreetMap because its licence is not compatible.
You may be able to use whatever source was used to update wikipedia though - please check the licences there.
Best Regards,
Andy

131694529

Please note that wikipedia is NOT a valid source for openstreetmap, because the licence is not compatible.

131663985

@PcMouce1 Not now, no.

131630230

I'm intrigued that religious extremists had those removed anywhere in the US! I guess the original Wicker Man never got a release there either? :)

120209907

Hello borovac,
Just to be clear, we can't use wikipedia as a source for OpenStreetMap, because the licence is not compatible, Of course, whatever source was used to update wikipedia may have a compatible licence - but you'll need to track down the sources that were used.
Certainly, the "name:en" that you have used here ("Baker Street tube...") is a loc_name, not a regular "name" at all.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

131512746

Merhaba Editör2724,
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036 üzerinden bir düzenleme savaşına girmiş gibi görünüyorsunuz. Lütfen bunu yapma. Adın yanlış olduğunu düşünüyorsanız, lütfen diğer haritacılara sorunun ne olduğunu ve neden değiştirilmesi gerektiğini düşündüğünüzü açıklayın. Buradaki çatışmanın uluslararası doğası göz önüne alındığında, ana "konuşma" posta listesini veya community.openstreetmap.org'u öneririm.
Saygılarımla,
Andy Townsend, OSM'nin Veri Çalışma Grubu adına.

131512746

Hello Editor2724,
You appear to be to be involved in an edit war over https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036 . Please don't do that. If you believe the name is wrong please explain to other mappers what the problem is, and why you think that it needs to be changed. Given the international nature of the conflict here, I'd suggest the main "talk" mailing list or community.openstreetmap.org
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

131599429

It would appear, based on https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/84763/edits-not-reflected-in-map?page=1&focusedAnswerId=86552#86552 and https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/84742/upload-file-using-uploadpy?page=1&focusedAnswerId=86553#86553 that you apear to be importing data without discussion. What is the licence for the data that that you are adding, what is the source, and what is the process? Unless you engage with the rest of the OSM community and answer questions like this we'll have no alternative but to revert these edits, since we don't know what the licence is.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

127841222

Re osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta#Profanity_Cleanup - actually, the user performing this edit seems to be missing from osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta#Mapping_Team Is it definitely someone from Facebook?